Home Blog Page 158

Who created God?

1

WHO CREATED GOD?

This is the outdated cliché of an atheist. Many classical scholars have addressed this question. In the books of creed, the concept is known as ‘Burhān al-Tatbīq’, where the question of Allāh’s existence is discussed. For example, the famous creed of Imām al-Taftāzānī *Sharh Aqā’id al-Nasafiyyah* – that is taught in the Islamic institutes – also discusses this concept.

From the English books, Hamza Tzortzis’s book, which I encouraged people to read yesterday, elucidates the answer to this question using the famous Quranic verse.
I’ll briefly adumbrate the main key points of this Quranic argument. The whole two verses are in Surāh al-Tūr (35/36):

ﺃَﻡْ ﺧُﻠِﻘُﻮﺍ ﻣِﻦْ ﻏَﻴْﺮِ ﺷَﻲْﺀٍ ﺃَﻡْ ﻫُﻢُ ﺍﻟْﺨَﺎﻟِﻘُﻮﻥَ ۰ﺃَﻡْ ﺧَﻠَﻘُﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺴَّﻤَﺎﻭَﺍﺕِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺄَﺭْﺽَ ﺑَﻞ ﻟَّﺎ ﻳُﻮﻗِﻨُﻮﻥَ

“Were they created from nothing, or are they creators themselves? Or [if as they say, Allāh did not create everything, then] did they [themselves] create the heavens and the earth? The fact is that they have no conviction”.

From the aforementioned verse, four scenarios – explicit and implicit – can be inferred:

1. Creation was created from nothing. ‘ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺷﻲﺀ ’ can have a few interpretations: created without any purpose, created without a creator or created from nothing, as mentioned by Imām al-Rāzī. The translation is based on the latter interpretation;

2. Creation are creators of themselves;

3. Everything being created by a created being;

4. And, finally, everything being created by an uncreated being.

Now, let’s discuss the first scenario: everything created from nothing, as many atheists say, including the contemporary scientist, Richard Dawkins. There was a video where he mentioned this and the public began to laugh at him. Anyway, this post is not about him. Why is this scenario void and nonsensical? Well, it’s pretty obvious because *nothing* by definition is non-existence, which never has and never will produce existence. From nothing comes nothing. Let me give you an example: you are in a completely locked room – nothing can enter it nor exit from it- and you decide to sleep; after an hour you wake up and you see a brand new bicycle, and next to it you find a note saying, “I came from nothing”. What will your initial reaction be? Will anyone actually believe that the bicycle came into that looked room from nothing? Of course not. So, can the entire universe and cosmos, which are beautifully designed, come from nothing?!

The second scenario, creation being creators of themselves, is void because it necessitates a contradiction: existence and non-existence exactly at the same time, like the profound example brother Hamza gives: can a mother give birth to herself? I believe this scenario is Zāhir al-Butlān (explicitly void) as the first scenario.
The third scenario, creation coming into existence by a created force or being, is also void, as this necessitates infinite regress of causes. For example, in the scenario of an atheist, when he asks: who created God? He has inevitably pictured a God to be a created entity in his finite and feeble mind. Thus, leading to a sequence of questions: who created God number two that created God number one, and who created God number three that created God number two, etc. This infinite regress will continue forever; hence, nothing will come into existence, as God number one’s existence is dependent on number two, and number two is dependent on number three, etc. So, number one will never come into existence; thus, there will be no creation.

The example that can be given to explain this further is of a person who is about to hunt an animal, but, before he shoots the animal, he needs permission from person number two, and person number two needs permission from person number three, etc. Now, if this carries on forever, will the first person ever shoot the animal? The answer is obviously no. In the same manner, infinite regress of causes, in the God scenario, will necessitate the denial of the initial creation. In order words, questioning who created God is denying your own existence.

This finally leads us onto the only sound and true scenario: everything is created by an uncreated being. The Muslims, based on Divine evidence, believe this being to be Allāh, the Almighty, who is transcendent from all weaknesses, flaws and contingencies. He, the All-Knowing, is unmitigatedly free from being created. The word created doesn’t apply to the ultimate Creator, rather it applies to the creation.

“It is He Who originated the [initial] creation and will repeat [the act of creation], and this [reviving the creation] will be easier for Him”
(Sūrah al-Rūm, verse 27).

Shaykh Mohammed Yasir Al-hanafi

KAAFIR!!! KAAFIR!!! KAAFIR!!! (Salafists without Salafs)

KAAFIR!!! KAAFIR!!! KAAFIR!!! (Salafists without Salafs)

One who does not know about Islam  would think that Da’wah is about  declaring people to be  non-Muslims. The way some people go about Da’wah today, one would think that they earn rewards based on the number of people they declare as Kaafir.

Da’wah which should be calling to the path of Allah with good words and wisdom is not same to some, as they go about their “Da’wah” with insults, enmity, ousting and hatred.

Once I wrote an article in parts against those who criticize those who engage in comparative religion. Check out these links;

https://knowislam.com.ng/answering-misconceptions-about-comparative-religion/

https://knowislam.com.ng/​answering-those-who-say-comparative-is-an-innovation-that-takes-one-to-hell/

The likes of the Ilorin ex-convcit who ignorantly lay claim to Salafiyyah do not have Salafs. In fact, they have rubbished many of the Salafs. The links above address the Hadeeth about ‘Umar (RA). When we ask those drunken with the opium of tekfiriyyah evidences against comparative religion, they provide none and when we give them evidences, they rubbish the scholars.

A sister informed me about Ustadh Amubieya’s statement at ACADIP Lecture, Ibadan yesterday and how some Salafists without Islam are wailing over it. I will highlight some questions asked by one YUSUF JIMOH and answer them;

He asked ; Are they ( ACADIP) calling to Tawheed?

Answer : It is always better to say that which is good and beneficial or keep silent. One should ask what this Yusuf Jimoh is doing to call people to Tawheed. Being a revert and a part of ACADIP NIGERIA, for the past two months, we have been publishing pages from Kitab At-Tawheed by Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdulwahab (check here https://knowislam.com.ng/category/book-reading/)

Therefore, the answer is yes and since I reverted to Islam, Mallam Yusuf Adepoju never at any point invited me to shirk, so? And if we agree to disagree that we do not call to Tawheed nor to Shirk, why not just start to do It yourself or where does it say that any Muslim who does not make it a priority to call people to Tawheed is a Kaafir?

He asked, “Are they waging war against the innovators?”

Answer : Yes except your definition of waging war against innovators is different. If your definition is to tekfir everyone, then NO and again, if you think anyone needs to do something relating to the Deen, kindly get it started so others follow instead of tekfirying those who do it not.

He asked : “Is it not one of Acadip friend named Jamiu “Adeguwa” deny the return of Issa. Is that not clear and open Kufr”

 

Answer : This one weak me. The same way people like Yusuf Jimoh and his likes are insults to Salafiyyah is the same way some people are to comparative religion. Kindly note that anyone can decide to be a comparator irrespective of his knowledge about the Deen (their own business). The fact that we have a Shia that recites the Qur’an properly does not make him have the same understanding of the Deen with a Sunni that also recites the Qur’an properly.

Several times, I have written against this. Not believing in the second coming of ‘Eesa (As) is not about comparative religion but a lack of understanding deeply rooted in Ahmadiyya. A Sunni cannot be responsible for what an Ahmadist does even if he recites the Qur’an well or they are into comparative religion together.

‘ Eesa (As) is a sign of the Hour and He is coming back, call Mallam Yusuf Adepoju, he says this many times during lectures affirming the coming back of ‘Eesa Ibn Maryam.

Salafiyyah is not a part of people like these and they no Salaf but their own myopic thoughts hence a need to reclaim Salafiyyah from them.
You do not get reward by the number of people you declare to be outside Islam, Allah’s aid is sought.

Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman

Causes Of Weakness Of Faith

0

CAUSES OF WEAKNESS OF FAITH

 
Q. I have some problems in Faith sometimes I know it is th eSataans. Can you give me some more stories that will give me more fairh.

A person may become negligent and that may lead to weakening his faith. The remedy for that is to pray a great deal for forgiveness and to constantly remember Allaah, and to read Qur’aan and focus on and ponder its meanings, for doing that will rid the heart of its carelessness and wake it from its slumber. And it is very important to do a lot of righteous deeds. 

Below are some reasons for weakness of faith, including the following: 

1 – Ignorance of the names and attributes of Allaah leads to weakness of faith because if a person is lacking in knowledge of the names and attributes of Allaah, his faith will be imcomplete. 

2 – Neglecting to think of the signs of Allaah in the universe and to ponder His commands and prohibitions. This causes a lack of faith or at the very least it makes faith stagnant and prevents it from growing. 

3 – Committing sin, for sin has a far-reaching effect on the heart and on faith. Hence the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “No adulterer is a believer at the moment when he is committing adultery.” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 2475; Muslim, 57). 

4 – Failing to do acts of worship, for failing to do acts of worship diminishes faith. But if the act of worship is something that is obligatory and it is neglected with no excuse, then this is a shortcoming for which a person is to be blamed and will be punished. If it is an act of worship that is not obligatory or it is obligatory but a person does not do it because he has an excuse, then this is a shortcoming for which he will not be blamed or punished. 

Majmoo’ Fataawa wa Rasaa’il Fadeelat al-Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen, 1/52 

We advise you to read Qur’aan a great deal and ponder its verses, for in that there is healing for what is in your heart, if Allaah wills. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): 

“And We send down of the Qur’aan that which is a healing and a mercy to those who believe”

[al-Isra’ 17:82] 

We also advise you to study the stories of the Prophets, for Allaah narrated them in the Qur’aan to make the heart of his Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and the believers with him, steadfast. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): 

“And all that We relate to you (O Muhammad) of the news of the Messengers is in order that We may make strong and firm your heart thereby. And in this (chapter of the Qur’aan) has come to you the truth, as well as an admonition and a reminder for the believers”

[Hood 11:120] 

O Allaah, make faith dear to us and make kufr (disbelief), evildoing and sin hateful to us, and make us of those who are rightly-guided.

Allaahu Musta’an

Is Iblees The Father Of All Jinn?

0

Is Iblees truly the father of all the jinn?

Q. Is Iblees the father of all Jinn, evil and righteous ones, or a father for only the evil Jinn?.

The devils (shayaateen) are the kuffaar of the jinn. Allaah, may He be exalted, says of the accursed Iblees (interpretation of the meaning): 

“except Iblees (Satan). He was one of the jinn; he disobeyed the Command of his Lord”

[al-Kahf 18:50]. 

Many scholars are of the view that Iblees is the father of all of the jinn, both the believing and disbelieving ones among them. He is their origin and they are his offspring. This view was narrated from Ibn ‘Abbaas, Mujaahid, Qataadah, al-Hasan al-Basri and others.  

There is a hadeeth concerning that which is attributed to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). It was narrated by al-Tabaraani in al-Mu’jam al-Awsat (6/197) from Mu’aawiyah ibn al-Hakam al-Sulami. But it is very weak (da’eef jiddan), as it was narrated only by Talhah ibn Zayd al-Qurashi of whom ‘Ali ibn al-Madeeni said: He used to fabricate hadeeth. See: Tahdheeb al-Tahdheeb(5/16). 

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah called Iblees the father of the jinn in more than one place (see Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 4/346, 235), as did his student Ibn al-Qayyim, then al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Baari(6/369). 

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (9/370-371): The shaytaan is the father of the jinn according to a number of scholars. He is the one who disobeyed his Lord and was too proud to prostrate to Adam, so Allaah expelled him and cast him away. End quote. 

It says in Fataawa Noor ‘ala al-Darb by Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (al-Jinn wa’l-Shayaateen, question no. 2) : 

Undoubtedly Iblees is the father of the jinn, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning) : 

“And the jinn He created from a smokeless flame of fire”

[al-Rahmaan 55:15] 

And He describes Iblees when he addressed the Lord of Glory (may He be glorified and exalted) (interpretation of the meaning) : 

“ ‘I am better than him (Adam), You created me from fire, and him You created from clay’”

[al-A’raaf 7:12] 

And Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): 

“Will you then take him (Iblees) and his offspring as protectors and helpers rather than Me while they are enemies to you?”

[al-Kahf 18:50] 

This evidence clearly indicates that Iblees has offspring and that the jinn are his offspring, but how did that come about? This is something of which we have no knowledge and it is something concerning which it does not matter if we are ignorant, and knowing it does not bring any benefit. And Allaah knows best. End quote. 

And Allaah knows best.

‘Emberphobia – Bashir LuCas Samson Lukman

0

OF MYTH AND SUPERSTITION

‘Emberphobia – Bashir LuCas Samson Lukman

The society we live in is filled with superstitious beliefs, myths, fables that are taken so seriously that they extend to religious houses/institutions. This is the time of the year when some’ Alfas’, pastors organize special prayers to survive the ’ember months.

It is believed that September, October, November and December are scary months that abhor much evil/calamity to prevent people from entering the new year. People should not just die during these months as they would say one is a victim of the ’ember spirit.

We really need to grow up. The vigils, crusade, special prayers organized by different religious leaders to ward off evil during these months does not and will not stop nor reduce the numbers of people scheduled to die during those months. When it is December, you are just some days to a new year only if you follow the Gregorian Calendar. Anyone who is so scared of the ’ember months should switch to another calender when it is September.

If one is impavid from January to August, there is no need to be afraid from September – December. Special ‘Ember prayers are unnecessary especially FOR A MUSLIM.

As we bear witness to the reality of tests,

As we accept our fate of leaving this dunya one day,

As we pray to live long,

May Allah take us when he is pleased with us (being Muslims submitting to the will of ALLAH). Ameen.

 

Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman.

Quran, The Unrevised Scripture

0

QURAN, THE UNREVISED SCRIPTURE.

There are different ways to prove that the Qur’an is the word of God, which has always been true and has never been subjected to change or distortion. These proofs can be classified into three types: the way the Qur’an was transmitted throughout the centuries, some challenging verses within the Qur’an itself, and the periodic, modern-day discoveries in the universe that were first mentioned in the Qur’an more than fourteen centuries ago. 

Unlike the Bible and Old Testament that have been subject to innumerable translations, doubtful and spurious transmissions, and corruptions at the hands of clerics up till now (with the “gender sensitive” versions coming out these days), the Qur’an was transmitted to us in an unprecedented and unique manner according to rigorous rules of transmission. The Qur’an was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) via the angel Gabriel, and the Prophet subsequently memorized the whole scripture. 

Thousands of the Companions of the Prophet learned the Qur’an directly from the Prophet (pbuh). They memorized it and were known in Islamic history as huffaadh (the memorizers and preservers of the Qur’an). Moreover, a number of Companions wrote it down during the lifetime of the Prophet (peace be upon him), and it was compiled in its entirety immediately after his death. 

The following generation of Muslims learned the Qur’an directly from the Companions. Thus the chain of teaching and learning through direct contact continued systematically, methodically, and meticulously until the present age. 

Additionally, several of the Companions of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) were appointed as scribes to record the words of the revelation directly from the Prophet himself on parchment, leather, or whatever else was available. The most famous of these scribes was Zayd ibn Thabit, who also memorized the entire Qur’an, and he formed with the others a community of huffaadh that can be compared to academic societies of our present time. 

We know the Qur’an was recorded in totality during the lifetime of the Prophet (pbuh) and the different surahs (chapters) personally arranged by him. Many copies of the text were used for study and teaching, even in Mecca before the Hijrah, the migration to Medina. 

The entire Qur’an was written down during the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad, and trusting the fact that many scholars knew it by heart, it was not collected in one volume. It was personally arranged by him, and the Muslims memorized it in the same order. The companion Uthman reported that whenever a new verse was revealed, the Prophet would immediately call a scribe to record it. He would instruct the person to put the specific verse or verses in a particular chapter. 

Furthermore, every year during the month of Ramadan, the Prophet would recite the whole Qur’an from beginning to end in its present-day arrangement, and everyday people could hear it from his own lips in the mosque. Its sequence is no mystery. Many of the Companions not only memorized it completely, they also wrote it down and even added commentary (tafseer) on their own personal copies. When the Prophet passed away, the whole Qur’an was already written down, but it was not yet compiled in book form. 

During the rule of the first Caliph Abu Bakr, there was a rebellion among some distant Arab tribes that resulted in a series of fierce battles. In one particular battle, a number Companions who had memorized the Qur’an were killed. The Companion Omar worried that the knowledge of the Qur’an was in danger, thus he convinced Abu Bakr that the Qur’an should be compiled into book form as a means of preserving it once and for all. 

Zayd bin Thabit was entrusted with this important task. Zayd followed strict methods in his compilation and had dozens of other huffaadh recheck his work to ensure its accuracy. Abu Bakr, who had also committed the entire Qur’an to memory, approved of the final product. After Abu Bakr passed away, the copy was passed to the Caliph ‘Omar, and then Uthman. 

However as the Muslim world expanded into lands where the people spoke Arabic as a second language, the new Muslims had a difficult time learning the correct pronunciation of the text. The Caliph Uthman consulted other Companions, and they agreed that official copies of the Qur’an should be inscribed using only the pronunciation of the Quraysh tribe, the Arabic dialect that the Prophet spoke. 

Zayd bin Thabit was again given this assignment, and three other huffaadh were assigned to help him in the task. Together, the four scribes borrowed the original, complete copy of the Qur’an, duplicated it manually many times over, and then distributed them to all of the major Muslim cities within the empire. Two of these copies still exist today: one is in Istanbul and the other in Tashkent. 

One must keep in mind that in traditional learning in the Arab world, transmission was based upon an oral tradition as well as a written one; the Arabs (and later all Muslims) excelled in accurately reporting scripture, poetry, aphorisms, etc. through the generations without change. Similarly, the chain of huffaadh was never broken, and thus the Qur’an today has reached us in two forms: the memorized version transmitted through the scholarly chain, and the written version based upon the Companions’ initial recording. 

If the Qur’an had been changed, there would be huge discrepancies between these two today, as the Qur’an has reached isolated (and sometimes illiterate) communities through the memorized form of transmission without the written form to correct it. No such discrepancies have ever been recorded or reported. In other words, isolated village A in African Mali and isolated village B in Afghanistan will both produce contemporary huffaadh reciting the same words of the Qur’an, though they did not learn from a similar printing of the scripture nor has there ever been a concerted international effort to rectify would-be discrepancies. 

Allah has said in the Qur’an that He alone will protect His book, and indeed He has kept His promise. The Qur’an that we read today contains the same exact words that were revealed to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) over 1400 years ago. This is quite a miracle, especially when you consider that no other group of people can say that their book has not been subject to change by the time it reached the present generation. 

Only the Qur’an has survived through the centuries unchanged, and the language in which it was revealed, classical Arabic, still enjoys practical usage around the world. While classic English of the 14th century can be understand by very few native English speakers, the Qur’an can be understood by the vast majority of Arabic-speaking Muslims. When compared to other scriptures, the Qur’an is unique in these two respects. 

Furthermore, from the prolific arts that have accompanied Qur’anic learning and transmission, we can learn of the auspiciousness and honor with which the Muslims have traditionally held the Qur’an. The visual arts of calligraphy and binding, and the vocal art of recitation represent examples of such arts, and from them we can see that veracity of transmission would be understood as a fundamental aspect of Qur’anic reverence. 

As regards the proofs within the Qur’an itself, they can be found in the following Qur’anic challenges: 

Surah 4, verse 82:

*{Do they not then meditate on the Qur’an? And if it were from any other than Allah, they would have found in it many a discrepancy.}*

Surah 17, verse 88:
*{Say: If men and jinn should combine together to bring the like of this Quran, they could not bring the like of it, though some of them were aiders of others.}*

And Surah 2, verse 23:
*{And if you are in doubt as to that which We have revealed to Our servant, then produce a chapter like it and call on your witnesses besides Allah if you are truthful.}* 

QURAN AND CREATION FROM HOT SMOKE

0

CREATION FROM HOT SMOKE

Scientists today are able to observe the formation of stars from a hot gas cloud. Formation from a warm mass of gas also applies to the creation of the universe. The creation of the universe as described in the Qur’an confirms this scientific discovery in the following verse:

وَجَعَلَ فِيهَا رَوَٰسِىَ مِن فَوْقِهَا وَبَٰرَكَ فِيهَا وَقَدَّرَ فِيهَآ أَقْوَٰتَهَا فِىٓ أَرْبَعَةِ أَيَّامٍ سَوَآءً لِّلسَّآئِلِينَ

And He placed on the earth firmly set mountains over its surface, and He blessed it and determined therein its [creatures’] sustenance in four days without distinction – for [the information] of those who ask.

ثُمَّ ٱسْتَوَىٰٓ إِلَى ٱلسَّمَآءِ وَهِىَ دُخَانٌ فَقَالَ لَهَا وَلِلْأَرْضِ ٱئْتِيَا طَوْعًا أَوْ كَرْهًا قَالَتَآ أَتَيْنَا طَآئِعِينَ

Then He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, “Come [into being], willingly or by compulsion.” They said, “We have come willingly.”

Quran 41:10-11

The Arabic word for “samaa’,” translated here as “heaven,” refers to the entire universe. The word “dukhaanun” for “smoke” describes the matter before the universe took its shape-the hot, cosmic smoke present during the creation of the universe, as now acknowledged by scientist.

This word in the Qur’an, in pinpoint fashion, describes this smoke very accurately for it is a warm body of gas containing mobile particles connected to solid substances. Here, the Qur’an has employed the most appropriate word from the Arabic language for describing the appearance of this phase of the universe. Let us note that only in the 20th century have scientists discovered that the universe emerged from a hot gas in the form of smoke.
In addition, the word “thumma,” translated as “then” in the expression “Then He turned to heaven when it was smoke,” bears other meanings such as “at this, in addition, furthermore, moreover, again, once more.” Here, “thumma” is employed not as an expression of time, but as an additional clarification.

The fact that such information about the creation of the universe is given in the Qur’an is nothing short of a miracle of the Qur’an.

Misgoded reading continued

0

Click here for previous session

 

 

One may wonder what, from the New Testament, separates these two groups by
such a vast expanse of understanding. Trinitarians, Unitarians and Muslims all claim to
follow the teachings of Jesus. But who really does, and who doesn’t?
For centuries the argument has been advanced that Trinitarians follow Pauline
theology in preference to that of Jesus. This charge is difficult to deny, for Jesus taught
Old Testament Law whereas Paul negated it. Jesus preached orthodox Jewish creed; Paul
preached mysteries of faith. Jesus spoke of accountability; Paul proposed justification by
faith. Jesus described himself as an ethnic prophet; Paul defined him as a universal
prophet.*
In disrespect to thousands of years of revelation conveyed through a long chain
of esteemed prophets, and contrary to the teachings of Rabbi Jesus, Paul focused not on
the life and teachings of Jesus, but upon his death. As Lehmann writes, “The only thing
which Paul considers important is the Jew Jesus’ death, which destroyed all hopes of
liberation by a Messiah. He makes the victorious Christ out of the failed Jewish Messiah,
the living out of the dead, the son of God out of the son of man.”119
More than a few scholars consider Paul the main corrupter of Apostolic
Christianity and the teachings of Jesus, and they are not alone. Many early Christian sects
also held this view, including the second­century Christian sect known as Adoptionists.
According to Bart D. Ehrman, “In particular, [the Adoptionists] considered Paul, one of the most prominent authors of our New Testament, to be an arch­heretic rather than an
apostle.”
120
Johannes Lehmann writes, “What Paul proclaimed as ‘Christianity’ was sheer
heresy which could not be based on the Jewish or Essene faith, or on the teaching of
Rabbi Jesus. But, as Schonfield says, ‘The Pauline heresy became the foundation of
Christian orthodoxy and the legitimate church was disowned as heretical.’” 121
He continues, “Paul did something that Rabbi Jesus never did and refused to do.
He extended God’s promise of salvation to the Gentiles; he abolished the law of Moses,
and he prevented direct access to God by introducing an intermediary.”122
Bart D. Ehrman, author of The New Testment: A Historical Introduction to
the Early Christian Writings and perhaps the most authoritative contemporary
voice reminds us that “Paul’s view was not universally accepted or, one might
argue, even widely accepted,” and that there were prominent Christian leaders,
including Jesus’ closest disciple, Peter, “who vehemently disagreed with him on
this score and considered Paul’s views to be a corruption of the true message of
Christ.”
123
Commenting on the views of some early Christians in the Pseudo­
Clementine literature, Ehrman writes, “Peter, not Paul, is the true authority for
understanding the message of Jesus. Paul has corrupted the true faith based on a
brief vision, which he has doubtless misconstrued. Paul is thus the enemy of the apostles, not the chief of them. He is outside the true faith, a heretic to be banned,
not an apostle to be followed.

 

……continue reading…..

At-Tauhid reading continued

0

Click here for previous session

 

 

Whoever obeys the Scholars and the Rulers, forbidding what Allah has made permissible and permitting what He has
made forbidden, has certainly taken them as Lords (besides Allah)

 

Ibn Abbas (May Allah be pleased with him) said: “(It may be that) Stones are soon to descend upon you from the heavens! I say to you: ‘Allah’s Messenger (May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) said…’ and you say to me: ‘Abu Bakr and Umar said!?” Ahmad bin Hanbal (May Allah be pleased with him) said: I am astonished at a people who know the chain of transmission (of a Hadith) and its
authenticity but nevertheless follow the opinion of Sufyan (Ath-Thauri) while Allah the Most High says: “Let those who oppose his (the Messenger’s) commandment (orders, statements, etc.) beware, lest some Fitnah (disbelief, affliction) befall them or a painful torment be inflicted on them.” (24:63)

Do you know what the Fitnah is? Al-Fitnah is Shirk. May be the rejection of some of his words would cause one to have doubt and deviation in his heart and thereby be destroyed.

It is narrated from Adi bin Hatim (May Allah be pleased with him) : I heard the Prophet (May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) read this verse: “They
(Jews and Christians) took their rabbis and their monks to be their lords besides Allah, and Messiah -son of Maryam, while they were commanded to worship none but One Ilah (God Allah) La ilaha illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He). Praise and glory be to Him, (far above is He) from having the partners they associate (with Him)”. (9:31)

So I said to him (May Allah be pleased with him)’ “Verily, we did not worship them,” to which he replied, “Did they not make Haram what Allah made Halal so you then made it Haram, and (did they not) make Halal what Allah made Haram and you therefore made it Halal?” I said, “Yes.” He said, “That is worshipping them.”
[Reported by Ahmad and At- Tirmidhi who graded it as Hasan (fair).]

 

Important issues of the Chapter

1) Explanation of the verse in Surat An-Nur (24:63).

2) Explanation of the verse in Surat Al-Bara’ah (or At-Taubah) (9:31).

3) Pointing out the meaning of worship that was initially denied by Adi (May Allah be pleased with him)

4) The example given, of Abu Bakr and Umar, by Ibn Abbas; and Ahmad’s example of Sufyan.

5) Conditions have changed to the point that the worship of monks has become the best of deeds under the name of A/-Wi/ayah (sainthood), while the worship of learned men in religion is considered knowledge and understanding. Thereafter, conditions changed to the point that
those worshipped besides Allah were not even righteous, and those were also worshipped who were absolutely.

 

 

……continue reading…..

 

 

 

 

ACADIP BIG FAMILY – MY SPECIAL VOTE OF THANKS

0

The fact that Hafsoh Oluwadamilare Mhz Mani is not my Daughter doesn’t mean Eneye Ahmad Jamiu Emma

My family ACADEMY, needs no introduction to hit DEMY…

If you need a Black Berry, You can ask Mrs. Arogundade, Philanthropist Are Sulaiman Are Sulaimon Abiodun or my Sweet Ruqoyah.

Who says we don’t Pray? When we’ve got Icon Abdulhakeem Olayide Tajudeen and Mhiz Okunlaya Hassanat that tells us not to go Stray…

We are so blessed that we even produced Rev. Frankman Jomo, a dedicated muslim that usually fast in the month of Shawwal,

If na lie, ask Sister Fatimah or Brother Olaoluwa Yusuf⁩,

I still recall when ⁨Brother Yusuf Ganiyu became Disconected, We confided in our Prof. based in Miami,

Our precious Hafsoh which is not Salami, so that things would not be Discongested…

How can I forget Mrs Bolatito Fifunmi, and Mrs. Fatimah Fatima Sulaimon Animashaun, Our precious Mumsicracy, for I would never forget cute Delicacy,

How can I omit Adebola Animashaun (Debany) that loves to practice his Deen,

When I have a great BOND in Hassan Nurudeen, and Johnson⁩ Abdulazeez Ayomide,

Even a Fake king deserves an OLORI,
because Mr & Mrs. Animashaun were part of the old Colony….

We’ve got Mr. SURUDARA from KWARA, he’s a SCHOLAR full of SWAGA,

Talk of a beauty Queen is Shakirah Toyin⁩, everly looks like a new born Baby,

My family surely supports AC (Acadip Connect, for in our midst we’ve got the great SC – (Shomolu Connect….

This reminds me of my favourite Station, and ⁨Funsho⁩ Funsho Ibn Animashaun for his love for Play Station,

It’s simply called Ogunwo Ephem, simply fantastic and it’s the real Ponkuem!

Europe at Winter, you can ask Sister. Fatimah O Victoria…

It’s simply full of SNOW, but with a cup of tea you’ll begin to FLOW,

Who says Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman⁩ “My GP”,
is not better than their VP …?

Because my Brother’s name is Nurudeen Hassan, Who never stays Afar,

I would never stop reciting my Askar,

I’m as happy as the Big Boyo, Wao! and remains as joyous like my friend called BAYO,

Remember today is not the wedding of Johnson⁩, but wait till Weekend you’ll cast many Demons…

All the Ibrahims are too Gbask, With Allah’s RAHMATs’l, they remain Kinky,

Any family that’s blessed with my beloved Hassan Taiwo, needs not find it’s blessings by going as far as Cairo,

If your name is not here, you can ask Ninu and I’m sure she will tell you not to Binu….

May God bless my brother called AB – AbdulWasii Balogun, Not forgetting Sister ⁨Khadijah Bint Maruf⁩,

…..And if there is need to name our King, we certainly give it to Ustaz Yusuf Adepoju⁩, the head of the Ring,

I know you think I’ve forgotten my Olori Apon Badmus Muh’Awwal Tunde Uptown⁩, and Sweetest Sister Aishat Adepoju⁩,

What about Mrs. ArogundADE, the rightful heir to our Golden ADE,

Because she’s good at everything including when she eats EDE, and she’s not corrupt like Mrs. Patricia ETE….

Please pardon me if your name is missing…

There are just too many important names that becomes practically difficult to include… Thanks

 

Courtesy – HasSan Ibn Maruphdeen (06198929)

FAVORITES

en_USEnglish