Home Blog Page 129

BETWEEN FIRDAUS AMASA AND AISHA FOLAMI, HOW NIGERIA MUSLIMS IMPROVED

0
Amasa Firdaus

 

The “call to bar hijab saga” which happened a little over a month ago, and made every one; Christians and Muslims alike, a judge or in the least, a juror in a grand jury made up on the internet is surprisingly still alive.I still come across hashtags #Justiceforfirdaous, #IstandwithFirdaus, et cetera,  all over social media, some also still have her as their social media profile pictures and press releases are being churned out regularly. Most recent one from Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), informing of the commencement of inquiry into the matter by the inquiry committee set up by the House of Reps.I must confess, it is the first of its kind. There have been several such cases of bias, intolerance, unnecessary show of hatred, assault and battery even, among others, been posted on the internet since time past, very recent ones including what “hijabites” face in NYSC camps across the country, especially in the Eastern states.

 

They never truly were fought to the pits by Nigerian Muslims, after a few days’ rant, one or two press releases from MURIC and other such Islamic bodies, the tide would die down and nothing would be said or heard of such again.Aisha O. FolamiOne most dear to my heart, which unfortunately Nigerian Muslims didn’t put enough effort to fight through and thoroughly, was the case of the “hijabite” broadcaster, Aisha Oloruntoyin Folami, who works in the Lagos Television (LTV) as a news anchor. I’d always enjoy seeing her beautiful and bright face while casting the news, until she was suddenly yanked from the position of a newscaster, only to be relegated within the newsroom. The full story was never brought to light, as people who knew exactly “what” could never really talk, as that could cost them their jobs. They’re civil servants and the interest of the government is paramount.I watched the news on NTA while growing up, and I’d always see a beautiful lady Fatimah Hassan in her scarf. It wasn’t a big deal to me then, in my little mind, being a Muslim, Christian or whatever faith you profess shouldn’t be, until I became this grown and got exposed to the bias and irregularities that has eaten deep into this nation in all its industries; private and public alike. It is no news that Muslims are being victimized, it is a statement of fact.

 

I wish Nigerian Muslims; concerned groups, Social Media Influencers, recognized Islamic bodies, etc. had actually done something beyond the usual “max” of two-three weeks rants and a protest. I wish we had stood our grounds and interfered in every available way. It is, after all, a government broadcasting station. It was indeed a huge blow on our faces, for we lost that even before the battle started. What is the use of wishes or perhaps, what do I know of the in-depth of matters such as this anyway? What I know is that we should never have let that matter die that way. She was like a representative of Islam in that regard, I know how glad I feel each time I watch Nymah Akashat Zibiri, on TVC’s “Your View”.I’ve witnessed Nigerian Muslims try countless time to vindicate Islam each time its haters set to work. That Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance shouldn’t be something too difficult to believe by any sane mind, as long as the Muslims complement that statement with righteous and peaceful characters at all times.Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah upon him, was said to have won several hearts to embrace Islam simply by his righteous deeds, even before preaching the words of God to them. Now that is what Muslims should keep striving to achieve, even while demanding for our rights, and that in itself would liberate us all.I’m glad Firdaus’ case is still very much alive (I still get dragged into it almost on a daily basis as a matter of fact) whatever reason that could be, it is to be a glitter of hope, my wishes weren’t any good then but my hope could serve better. It is also a reassurance that we get better at what we do, driving our agitation and rights home to where it matters, standing our grounds regardless and fighting for a right that is a clear injunction from our Lord.Her case has further opened a can of worms that has always been slightly opened to an average practising Muslim lady in Nigeria, now is the time to dispose the worms and thrash the can.What surprises me greatly is how some, Christians especially, put it upon themselves to berate her.

 

To everyone; Muslims and Christians alike, who took it as a duty to insult, berate, judge or curse her, I’m sure you all are well rested by now, but it was never your fight, to begin with. Despite that I initially had my reservations about the whole issue, I couldn’t help but salute her courage, she truly is a heroine and a great model in that respect.Thank you, Firdaus Amasa Abdusalam, for fighting the battle for your predecessors and successors like us.May Allah bless our struggles and grant the Muslim ummah success against oppressors all over the world.Note, however, when I say Nigerian Muslims I mean the conscious ones – not the ones who tell you worship is limited to what’s solely in their hearts, while they do not exactly understand the language their hearts speak.

Written by: Mar’yam Thaoban ( NobleHeart)

Rejoinder to A Message for the Muslim Bible Warriors

0

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

 

I have received different notifications these past two weeks notifying me of different comments I was mentioned on Facebook. Of these comments, I have seen where someone wrote that all reverts that embraced Islam through comparative religion are Kaafir. I ignored posts and comments like these as I do not find answering them beneficial but a waste of time.

 

However, my attention was called to an article written by someone who said Silence is Golden but he does not truly consider being silent especially on what he has little or no knowledge about. When I made a correction against Silence being Golden, I said, “Yes! Silence is Golden but in a world where people read the beginning and the last line of an article then make a conclusion, it is important that we explain the context of silence is golden so people don’t take it up and think silence is golden in ALL situations. Though he disagreed with my humble submission, this same person is not an example of silence is golden. What is the essence of teaching silence is golden without maintaining silence or is your silence only golden when it comes to oppression and victimization against the ‘Ummah?

 

I will not mention the name of this author not to give him undue popularity and also not to help spread his lies. He wrote,

 

“There is that morbid competition of who can win more Christians between the Osun-Ondo axis of Muslim Bible Warriors of the ACADIP calling Jamiu Adegunwa’s Risaalatul-Haqq (that apparently takes after Ahmed Deedat’s Izharul-Haqq) bloc based in Lagos – the avowed centre of everything in Nigeria including craziness.”

 

Praise be to Allah! I thank Allah that Salafiyyah is not strange to us else one would think that Salafiyyah is another name for lies, speculations, being scholarly on ignorance but Alhamdulillah, Salafiyyah is free from lacing Qur’an verses with lies and unfounded criticism. It is upon this author to prove that indeed, there is a morbid competition of who can win more Christians. Do I need to state the several number of times I myself have stated that it is only Allah that guides in light of the following Qur’an verse,

 

Surah Al-Lail, Verse 12:
إِنَّ عَلَيْنَا لَلْهُدَىٰ

Verily We take upon Ourselves to guide,
(English – Yusuf Ali)

Anyone attempting to confirm this statement of his would think that he sat down with those competing for reverts to have been so sure of the competition. In an attempt to further confirm his statement, one might even try to watch (ACADIP) CDS to see the Chief Lecturer, Mallam Yusuf Adepoju with a rope to tie down Christians that are not willing to embrace Islam or the security crew preventing non-Muslims from leaving because they are not willing to embrace Islam.

 

I wonder how someone like Mallam Yusuf Adepoju who is so much about convincing a Christian would quote a verse like,

 

Surah Al-Bayyina, Verse 6:
إِنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ وَالْمُشْرِكِينَ فِي نَارِ جَهَنَّمَ خَالِدِينَ فِيهَا أُولَٰئِكَ هُمْ شَرُّ الْبَرِيَّةِ

Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures.
(English – Yusuf Ali)

Should he not be so diplomatic and try to romance non-Muslims with sweet words as regards the concept of Hell, not dying except as a Muslim being that he is so much about who gets more convert?

 

As regards relationship with Jamiu Adegunwa, the distant relationship is not due to competition but someone’s hatred for people on the Qur’an and Sunnah based on the understanding of the pious predecessors. So, imagine being grouped with someone who constantly attacks you because you agree with ‘Eesa was not crucified and He is coming back just because who thinks he has so much knowledge about Islam did not take his time to research but concluded that it is a competition. He wrote again,

 

“But all of them – the Yusuf group and Risaalatul –Haqq – have many things in common: they all seek to win as many Christians as possible to Islam. Thus banking on numbers of converts has become a selling tag of recent. Four hundred people embraced Islam in Ibadan, seventy in Modakeke, one hundred in Akure, etc, are the sprawling headlines on their several media outlets.”

 

Please, what should they write? 1000 Muslims leave Islam? 200 sunni become Shittes? One would think that he got a revelation to have been so sure of his unfounded claims! How clairvoyant!

 

This mischievous, lying, cunning individual wrote,

 

” Another common phenomenon is the fact that many of them know more of the Bible than the Qur’aan – if they know the latter at all. When you hear them sparingly and incorrectly quote the Qur’aan it sickens your heart, but let them quote the Bible, the Pope himself will have his mouth agape. How many times have they dealt with the best of the pastors such that the latter wee in their trousers!”

 

I laughed when someone said (in response to this), that it is an admonition. I cannot bring myself to understand how this is an Admonition, not even the type of criticism permissible. These are pure lies, hatred, total condemnation, unresearched claims, speculations, unhealthy guesses and product of a corrupt mindset.

 

Again, we don’t need to dabble into what we know almost nothing about. When I read that, “When you hear them sparingly and incorrectly quote the Qur’aan it sickens your heart, but let them quote the Bible, the Pope himself will have his mouth agape”, I started to imagine brothers we recite Qur’an together and wonder if it is so sickening like he claimed. Would that not mean he is a better reciter than Sheikh Hussary or Minshawi or Abdulbasit Abdulsamad. Yes! Not everyone engaging in comparative religion knows how to properly recite the Qur’an, but is that supposed to be a Comparative problem?

 

The reason why many comparators are  really failing is because they know so much of the Bible than the Qur’an not knowing that to compare two things, one needs proper knowledge of the two. The question is, “what calls for the generalization or what calls for crucifying everyone based on the lapses of some people. How is this writer different from those who are into comparative religion but do not know much about Islam when he makes a general declaration not taking his time to make proper research?

 

For those who still call it an Admonition from him, they should ask who he called (in ACADIP) to admonish privately or is the below really an Admonition?

“They think they follow the righteous way. By Allaah, their methodology is evil and misleading.”

 

His brothers, the Jabatas already made tekfeer of the reverts and comparative lectures, we wait for him to declare them as sects so we can be sure the ticket of the gate of Jahannam is their inheritance!

 

This person wrote again, ” The crux however is the fact that they give little or no attention to the Islamic learning. The converts they make are made to follow them about in selling their wares. They don’t encourage them to go in the path of learning.”

 

As much as I wished to ask Allah to break his back for this seeming authoritative claim is false and that maybe he be rewarded if it is true, I will simply ask Allah to rectify him and rectify us. SubhanAllah!!! How can people lie so confidently! That comparative organizations do give little or no attention to Islamic learning is not a fact but a false assumption and speculation. One would think that people like him who know so much about Islam will request that they teach reverts. I pray that no revert falls into the hands of people like this so they are not taught to tell lies and proudly spread propaganda. So, if all comparative lecturers are to be blamed for a revert’s ignorance little or no knowledge of Islam, shall we blame the scholars for the shenanigans we see amongst Muslims today. If he is so much concerned about teaching Islam and no other intention, shall we blame him for or ask what he has done to help;

 

* The several Imams (may Allah preserve them on khayr) that cannot recite Suratul Fatiha with proper Tajweed?

 

* The several number of Muslims who go for Jummu’ah on Friday and Church on Sunday. Those who have no problem with praying in Jesus’ name.

 

* The mothers, grandmothers, sisters that do not use the Hijab but scarfs. Who is he blaming?

 

* The sons and daughters of  many Imams who do not appear to be Muslims even from their looks, club and drink!

 

* Those who bear Lasisi, Muri, Rasaki and married to more than 4 wives yet in the name of Islam.

 

* The several ìyá lojas when the Adhan is being called, they do not hasten to pray.

 

* The Muslims  in Ilorin (just saying as this is everywhere) that during Dhur, ‘Asr, Maghrib and ‘Ishaa, you see more Muslims on the road, shops than you see in the mosque.

 

 

If comparative lecturers need to be crucified because many reverts are not too good in Islam, can we get a statistic of the number of Muslims from birth against Reverts that know about Islam the less? I fear that soon, a group will arise, build their own Masjid and you can’t pray in the Masjid except you wear a Niqob because it is not a house of those who have flaws but of angels. In their Manhaj, Admonition based on Adab and Hikmah would be missing but just Crucifixion.

 

Meanwhile, at knowislam.com.ng, we done, still doing and will continuing to do our best. We just finished reading, Kitab At-Tauhid and we will pick another book on Tawheed soon, In shaa Allah.  As regards learning online, there are many things one can gain though online teaching platforms should not and cannot replace going to the Madrasah. It is just important to know that many reverts are out there that are being victimized at home that they cannot even attempt to attend a Madrasah, will they then not learn?

 

For this who called me based on the last article I write about a revert, let me state that I cannot make an independent decision hence I had a discussion with those that should be discussed with, we have not reached a conclusion, we’re working towards a system that will really work for seeing to reverts’ psychological, spiritual and financial problems.

 

To finally shut this great liar, these are the courses we have at Acadip online Institute Of Comparative Religion Studies (AICOS)

 

Islamic Religion Knowledge

Islamic Da’wah Methodology

Comparative Religion

 

The first two are prerequisites for Comparative Religion because we are well aware that someone who engages in Comparative Religion without Islamic Knowledge or Da’wah Methodology, his utterances would be a Fitnah to people and a trial for him. With the above courses, is it not going to surprise those who came up with something like that when they read that they are accused of studying the Bible than that Qur’an?

 

It is also worthy to state that we are not perfect and as humans, we have flaws. We ask Allah to rectify us and make us better Muslims, same for the ‘Ummah. Also worthy to note that this is not an attempt to defend all Comparative Lecturers in the world, I have written to make clarifications and affirm that most of what he included ACADIP Nigeria in are strange not just to me but the Chief Lecturer and those who are a part of ACADIP NIGERIA.

 

We ask Allah to rectify our brother and if he so much thinks that he is now a sure candidate of Jannah, let him ask for death to be saved from the “Fitnah” of Comparative Religion.

I’m a Muslim on the Qur’an and Sunnah based on the understanding of the pious predecessors. You didn’t invite me to Islam nor to be on the path of the Salafs so your delusion does not and will not take me away from the path. I swear by Allah, whoever embraces Muslims and not Islam will definitely become disappointed.

Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman is the CEO, Knowislam.com.ng and member of ACADIP NIGERIA.

SMALL BUT BIG BY SANNI KAY YUSUF

0

 

There are several grievous sins in the sight of Allah that are deeply, routinely rooted in people’s daily attitudes. One of such is tale bearing – talking ill of someone behind him.

If a neighbour or a friend had a baby last year and she is carrying another pregnancy this year, of what disadvantage is that to madam talebearer – the tattler of the century? She goes about tattling her neighbour or friend as if she had something at stake with the coming of the baby. Ofofo o gbe’gbaa, ibi ope lo mo.

Telltales are idle. That’s why shaytan usually easily plays sudoku with their brains. Even those who have jobs among them have been overridden by their wageless work of calumniation. Awon alainironu!

No one can be legitimately rich – acquires a land, a house or a car – without being tagged a ritualist or a thief. At the slightest progress of anyone, their assembly of devils is instantly conveyed to invoke satire and vilification. Awon k’eni ma ni, eranko!

Tale bearing is sometimes done to bring people down so as to level up to their positions or grow above them. In order to achieve this ungodly feat, tattlers go the extra mile in falsifying innocent, guiltless people, all in the name of journeying to the ladder top, forgetting that nemesis (atubotan) beats much more than the cane. It is no hyperbole, therefore, that the posts occupied by some persons today were attained having successfully brought down some other persons by the way of tale bearing. Hmm! Esan m bo!

Tale bearing, rumormongering, gossiping, tattletale or calumniation is considered a small, trivial sin by the doers, but apparently, it is big in the sight of Allah. Any act that may land one in hell isn’t in any way trivial. It is a serious matter.

“He will not enter the Paradise, a talebearer,” so expressly said by the holy Prophet.

It’s disheartening that the evil of tale bearing thrives so easily in the mosque where matters and activities are supposed to be decorously handled. What a pity!

Some people became so addictive to this unwholesome, disuniting mess that they successfully desecrated the house of Allah – the masjid! Subhaanallah! They scandalise for only God knows why. There is nothing done by the leadership of the mosque that is not greeted by antagonism, not criticism. A critic addresses issues objectively, and with remedies, while an antagonist condemns decisions with no solutions proffered. The antagonist- talebearer sees what is good as bad, and of course, what is bad as good. He is a foe, not a friend. He may pretend to be a friend, but he is a foe

Those who make the evil of the talebearers flourish are the dogmas, the acquiescent ninnies who take tales from their bearers hook, line and sinker; those who do not verify matters before onward dissemination; those who are pathologically gullible that accept anything that enters their ears as veracious – the zombies.

Allah says:

“O you who have believed, when a talebearer comes to you with a piece of information, do verify, so that you do not abuse a people ignorantly, after which you regret your actions.” Q49 V61.

Mr, Madam talebearer, it is never too late to repent from your ungodly act. Remember, the grave is calling.

Misgoded reading continued

0

Click here for previous session

 

 

Isaiah 40:8 claims that “the word of our God stands forever.” This assertion
doesn’t excuse copying errors, or any other error, regardless how slight. In fact,
according to Isaiah 40:8, any “word” which has not “stood forever” is disqualified as
having been from God.  Which should make us question the authorship.
If “the word of our God stands forever,” and the “word” of Ahaziah’s age doesn’t
stand the test of time, whose word is it? God’s or Satan’s?
Don’t look now, but even the Old Testament seems uncertain on this point.
2 Samuel 24:1 reads, “Again the anger of the LORD was aroused against Israel,
and He moved David against them to say, ‘Go, number Israel and Judah.’” However,
1 Chronicles 21:1 states, “Now Satan stood up against Israel, and moved David to
number Israel.”
Uhhh, which was it? The Lord, or Satan? There’s a slight (like, total) difference.
Talk about identity theft.
But seriously, the mistake is understandable. After all, it’s pretty hard to know
who you’re talking to, when you can’t put a face to revelation. And, as God said in
Exodus 33:20, “You cannot see My face; for no man shall see Me, and live.”
So there we have it.
No man can see God’s face, and live.  Well, except for Jacob, of course. As Genesis 32:30 states, “So Jacob called the
name of the place Peniel: ‘For I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved.’”
And we mustn’t forget Moses, as per Exodus 33:11: “So the LORD spoke to
Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend.”

So no man can see God’s face, and live.
Except for Jacob and Moses.
But God didn’t mention that exception, did He?
So maybe He changed His mind.
And then again, maybe not.
On one hand, Genesis 6:6­7 suggests that God makes mistakes for which He
repents, as follows: “And the LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and
He was grieved in His heart. So the LORD said, ‘I will destroy man whom I have created
from the face of the earth, both man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for I
am sorry that I have made them’” (italics mine).
On the other hand, Numbers 23:19 records, “God is not a man, that He should lie,
nor a son of man, that He should repent.”
The point, if not already obvious, is that the Old Testament is fraught with errors.
Perhaps the simplest errors are numerical, and these are plentiful. For example, 2
Samuel 8:4 speaks of David taking seven hundred horsemen and 1 Chronicles 18:4,
describing the exact same event, makes it seven thousand.
Big deal.
Seven hundred in one verse, seven thousand in another—obviously some scribe
flubbed a zero.  Wrong.
The Old Testament doesn’t have zeros. Nor, for that matter, does it have
numerals. In the time of the Old and New Testaments, the Arabic numerals we are all familiar with weren’t in common use. The clumsy Roman numerals were the language of
mathematics, and the earliest evidence of the zero dates from 933 CE.
In ancient Hebrew, numbers were written longhand. Seven hundred was sheba’
me’ah and seven thousand was sheba’ eleph. So this scriptural difference may indeed
represent a scribal error, but it’s not a simple error of a zero. Rather, it’s the difference
between me’ah and eleph.
Similarly, 2 Samuel 10:18 speaks of seven hundred charioteers and forty thousand
horsemen, and 1 Chronicles 19:18 speaks of seven thousand charioteers and forty
thousand foot soldiers. 2 Samuel 23:8 records eight hundred men, 1 Chronicles 11:11
numbers them at three hundred. And in case the reader suspects they are speaking about
different events, Josheb­Basshebeth and Jashobeam are cross­referenced, clarifying that
both passages describe the same person. 2 Samuel 24:9 describes eight hundred thousand
men “who drew the sword” in Israel and five hundred thousand in Judah;
1 Chronicles 21:5 puts the numbers at one million one hundred thousand in Israel and
four hundred and seventy thousand in Judah. 2 Samuel 24:13 describes seven years of
famine, 1 Chronicles 21:11­12 states it was three. 1 Kings 4:26 numbers Solomon’s horse
stalls at forty thousand, 2 Chronicles 9:25 numbers them at four thousand. 1 Kings 15:33
teaches that Baasha reigned as king of Israel until the twenty­seventh year of Asa, king of
Judah; 2 Chronicles 16:1 states Baasha was still king of Israel in the thirty­sixth year of
Asa’s reign. 1 Kings 5:15­16 speaks of 3,300 deputies to Solomon, 2 Chronicles 2:2
records 3,600. In 1 Kings 7:26 we read of two thousand baths, but in 2 Chronicles 4:5 the
number is three thousand. 2 Kings 24:8 states “Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when
he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months.” 2 Chronicles 36:9 records, “Jehoiachin was eight years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem three
months and ten days.” Ezra 2:65 writes of two hundred men and women singers,
Nehemiah 7:67 states they were two hundred and forty­five.
Now, are these differences important?
Answer: Yes, and no. For the most part, we could care less how many baths,
singers and foot soldiers there were, or whether one scribe made a slip of the stylus while
another rounded numbers off to the nearest hundred. From the point of conveying useful
information, these discrepancies are insignificant. However, from the point of validating
the Old Testament as the inerrant word of God, these discrepancies are highly significant.
Furthermore, there are numerous discrepancies which are not numerical in nature.
For example, Genesis 26:34 tells us Esau’s wives were Judith and Basemath;
Genesis 36:2­3 records his wives as Adah, Aholibamah and Basemath. 2 Samuel 6:23
states that Michal was childless until the day she died; 2 Samuel 21:8 attributes five sons
to Michal. 2 Samuel 8:9­10 speaks of Toi as king of Hamath, and Joram as an emissary
of King David; 1 Chronicles 18:9­10 records the king’s name as Tou, and that of the
emissary as Hadoram.
Again, not a big deal.
But here’s something that is:
2 Samuel 17:25 tells us Jithra (a.k.a. Jether; both names are cross­referenced, so
we know these two passages speak of the same individual) was an Israelite, whereas
1 Chronicles 2:17 identifies him as an Ishmaelite. Now, if Old Testament authors
couldn’t get this straight, we might wonder how much more inclined they might have
been, being Jewish, to calculated lineage­switching in the case of Abraham sacrificing his “only begotten son,” Isaac. In the “Jesus Begotten?” chapter earlier in this book, I
discussed the fact that at no time was Isaac the only begotten son of Abraham. And we
find here that Old Testament authors substituted “Israelite” with “Ishmaelite” when there
was no obvious motivation. How much more likely would they have been to have
switched lineages when their birthright and covenants with God were at stake?

 

 

……continue reading……

Illustrious Son of Ilobu – Mallam Yusuf Adepoju

32

He is a very young man, very-very intelligent, loaded with innate ability to score very high marks in whatever he ventures into. I remember many things that he did excellently well in those good old days. When he was in love with music, he was excellent with the mimicking of many foreign songs. When he went into graphic design to make ends meet, he was superb. I remember how he taught me some skillful ways of beautifying cardboards meant for the production of greeting cards. His exploit in GNLD, a networking business further confirms that he is always the best in whatever he ventures into. With the GNLD business, he was on top of the world at a very tender age. No doubt, his success story today in the Academy of Islamic propagation, ACADIP speaks volume about him being a special creation, destined to rule the world and be the very best at whatever he is doing.

Yusuf Olatunde Oladimeji Adepoju was born on the 10th of February, 1975 to the family of Alhaji Jamiyu Adeniyi Isola Adepoju and Alhaja Amdalat Ibidunni Adepoju of Akeyo’s compound, Ilobu. His father and mother are both retired Principals. He attended L. A. Gbobamu Primary School from 1981 to 1986, ADS Grammar School, Erin-Osun from 1987 to 1990 before proceeding to the Government College, Ibadan and he finally completed his secondary education at Fakunle Comprehensive High School, Osogbo in 1994. He studied Physics Electronics at the Federal University of Technology, Akure and graduated in 2001.

It was at FUTA, that he met some talented youths with whom he formed a dawah group with the sole aim of checkmating the alarming rate at which Muslims were fast drifting away from the path of the believers as a result of ignorance and lack of knowledge. The Islamic propagation initially took off at FUTA, later to Akure township, Ondo State generally and today he has stood for what he believes in and has defended it in virtually all the states of the federation with thousands of converts and reverts to Islam. He has also taken this Dawah to 15 different countries; Germany, England, Belgium, United Arab Emirates, Netherlands, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Rwanda, Morocco, Ghana etc. In the course of propagating Islam he has developed strong working relations with some great world Islamic Comparative preachers like Shiekh Ahmed Deedat, Professor Jamal Badawi, Dr, Dawood Amoo Alaga, Professor Buniyamin Banire, Late Alhaji Yunus Akewewugbajesu and many others.

After 21 solid years of open-air lecture series in the nooks and crannies of Nigeria and beyond, he is very proud to announce that ACADIP has displayed a new order of dynamic and captivating Evangelism, projecting Islam in its natural and undiluted perspective, strengthening the faith of practicing Muslims and also awakening those unwary, lukewarm or rather, the so called nominal Muslims from their slumber.

Yusuf Olatunde Oladimeji Adepoju is currently the Managing Director of Islamic Cultural and Enlightment Centre founded by his father in 1965. He has positioned Ilobu elegantly on world map with his Islamic preachings. He has also succeeded in refining and engaging many Ilobu youths in his Islamic organizations. The security outfit of ACADIP alone parades about 200 officers both native and non-natives.

He is indeed a special breed, showcasing his talents with the mastery of the Bible and the Quran off hand. His command of the Arabic , English and Yoruba languages is enough to arrest his listeners. He is one out of the very many finest young brains that Ilobu is blessed with.

In recognition of his invaluable uplift of Ilobu community and her natives via his Islamic Comparative lectures around the globe, I therefore present Alhaji Yusuf Olatunde Oladimeji Adepoju as an illustrious son of Ilobu asake.

 

 

Dare Alabi,
Project Director.

FORCEFUL TOLERANCE

0

FORCEFUL TOLERANCE
BY
SANNI KAY. YUSUF

She visited the hospital for her fortnight antenatal routine checkup. It was her first time to enjoy the NHIS package – in the hospital – courtesy of her hubby’s workplace.

Together with women of her condition carrying the fruits of the womb, she was requested to go up for counselling. As an enlightened person who understood the significance of such an exercise, she eagerly mounted the staircase – uneasily.

Counselling they were told, but singing and dancing it was turned into. Not Yoruba (abiyamo/oloyun) songs, but christian-oriented songs. She wondered but bothered less, as she thought the deed would take no length of time. As a muslimah faithful to her faith, she sat down apathetically.

After the singing and buttock-rolling, came up prayers – in Jesus’ name. She wondered but bothered less, with the thought that observations and corrections would be done later. She never wanted to truncate or interrupt the flow of the oppression so as not to be tagged as usual – extremist, fanatic, fundamentalist, terrorist – the list is inexhaustible. With her mouth mute, the christian prayers went on untill it got to its tail.

At the lapse of prayers was the trumpeted counselling. That beamed a sigh of relief for the ummu from the seemingly inescapable cage. But lo and behold, it was just the start of the oppression! What was supposed to be counselling turned out to be preaching in the christian way. Madam Counsellor started making quotations from the Bible to adduce her special counselling. The ummu couldn’t take it any longer. So, she voiced out her worries:

“Is this not supposed to be a counselling session? Why christian songs, prayers and preaching in a hospital that is privately general? Or is the hospital only meant for Christians?”

“That’s our usual practice here,” said the preacher-nurse.

“You should have made us know that your hospital is run on the precepts and principles of the Christendom.” She said as she quietly left the gathering.

What could be more oppressing, terrorising than this – when you are forced to tolerate where your right is unapologetically trampled upon? Why would people met out to others what they cannot tolerate of them?

It’s a country of multi-religion. Constitutionally, everyone has the right, not only to practise, but manifest his religion; however, not to the peril or detriment of others.

A muslim is disallowed to do so, just as he should not take such from anyone. “There is no compulsion in the religion,” so says Allah – Q2 V256. Nigeria belongs to all, not to some.

“To you be your religion, and to me my religion.” Q109 V6.

DA'WAH OF A MUSLIMAH

0

DAWAH OF A MUSLIMAH By Nafeesah Bint Yakub

Let’s not consider or judge what we hear or read through medias like CNN, ABC, BBC, FOX and the rest, let not ask a non Muslim what and how the Muslim women feel, how they live, their challenges and their responsibilities, if we wish to be fair and conscious of our environment, ask the Muslim women about their ordeal.

We now live in a world where Muslim women can’t do what they like doing either because of their appearance or faith they profess, a typical example is one of our sisters when she was denied the call to bar on account of her Deen as a Muslimah, this not the only example where Muslim women are oppressed, also the popular case of Sherifat Yunnus whose Niqob(veil) was yanked off at an exhibition comes to mind.

If you wish to be fair, ask a Muslim woman who struggled to get to where she is, for a Muslim woman who practice her religion and is still able to stand on her feet in such a bias and an unstable society.

Why are Muslim women been discriminated owing to differences in faith? If others are free to reveal their bodies at will, why is it difficult for a Muslim woman who nurtures an ambition of becoming a medical doctor, use it as a Da’wah tool for the Ummah(humanity) after going through the rigorous study to merit and earn her certificate only to eventually get denied a job because she wears the HIJAB. How does the hijab affect her profession?

No one is really ready to ask the Muslim women, our long gone professors, we have women amongst them, not one nor two, Muslim women have and are excelling in various professions around the world, why are Muslim women underrated, oppressed and denied their rights? Why is the Nigeria community allowing its human resources in Muslim women waste away out of hatred? If we select 100 Muslim women between the ages of 17-40, 60% will be, are graduates of higher institutions both local and abroad with good employable grades, with very appealing potential and socially endowed but are mostly denied the opportunity to showcase their knowledge, skills or talent.

Many are times, ‘people’, especially non-Muslims say “Look! with her level of education, she still wears that ….., Mr., Miss, Mrs., it’s not called that ….. but a HIJAB, MODESTY, FREEDOM … Muslim women aren’t cowards, dull, antisocial, vague or stale, rather they are mothers, teachers, role models, professionals whom have been denied because they are Muslimah.

Mr., Miss, Mrs., I’ve questions for you; Why are Muslim women exploited, oppressed, maltreated, denied because they don’t share same faith with you while you tolerate others who are non Muslims? Are we been fair?

A young Muslimah going for an interview find it hard using her hijab purposely because she will be denied the job especially because of her identify as a Muslimah, what a biased world we live, even in psychology and sociology, there are aspects that mentioned individual differences, there is a constitutional provision for religious differences.

Islam raised the status of women, and made them equal with men in most rulings. So women, like men, are commanded to believe in Allaah and to worship Him. And women are made equal to men in terms of reward in the Hereafter. Women have the right to express themselves, to give sincere advice, to enjoin what is good and forbid what is evil, and to call people to Allaah. Women have the right to own property, to buy and sell, to inherit, to give charity and to give gifts. It is not permissible for anyone to take a woman’s wealth without her consent. Women have the right to a decent life, without facing aggression or being wronged. Women have the right to be educated; in fact it is obligatory to teach them what they need to know about their religion, other forms of knowledge and provide enabling environment to exhibit what they’ve acquired in terms of knowledge and skills.

Muslims must rise to the occasion to defend Muslim rights especially the women. Doing so will not only entrench women’s right but also encourage Muslim women to pursue their God granted dream profession.

BROTHERHOOD AND SUNNAH

0

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN THE QURAN AND SUNNAH

BismilLaahir Rahmaanir Raheem.

Brotherhood in Islam is a comprehensive concept that is based upon good character with others, treating others the way we want to be treated, and uniting together upon common values. It has three levels of degree: religion, family, and humanity. Each of these levels has a set of rights and duties that a Muslim must uphold with others.

The strongest level of brotherhood is the sense of community, friendship, and common purpose in Islam for the sake of Allah. At this level, the believers work together towards fulfilling the goals of the religion and living out its divine values.

Allah says:
إِنَّمَا الْمُؤْمِنُونَ إِخْوَةٌ فَأَصْلِحُوا بَيْنَ أَخَوَيْكُمْ وَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُرْحَمُونَ

The believers are but brothers, so make reconciliation between your brothers and fear Allah that you may receive mercy. Surat al-Hujurat 49:10
And Allah says:
وَاعْتَصِمُوا بِحَبْلِ اللَّهِ جَمِيعًا وَلَا تَفَرَّقُوا
Hold firmly to the rope of Allah all together and do not become divided. . Surat Aali Imran 3:103. Unfortunately today, we are divided and hate each other even because of political parties we follow ignorantly. We fight and hate each other because two non Muslims are convincing us to vote for them to cause corruption on the land of Allah with no respect to the Sharia or rules of ALLAH. We have created our own suffering as such we must stop sympathising with the suffering Muslims are going through and step up our efforts to get Muslims to unite and love each other for ALLAH sake and fill up our masjids each day enjoying good and forbidden evil if we want Allah to have mercy on us. These humiliation by the kuffar will continue till we return to the path of the QUR’AN and Sunnah. That’s the prophesy of our beloved messenger of ALLAH not my sayings.

Although we use the word “brotherhood,” what we really mean is a faith-based community that includes both men and women as brothers and sisters in religion.

Allah says:
وَالْمُؤْمِنُونَ وَالْمُؤْمِنَاتُ بَعْضُهُمْ أَوْلِيَاءُ بَعْضٍ ۚ يَأْمُرُونَ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَيَنْهَوْنَ عَنِ الْمُنكَرِ وَيُقِيمُونَ الصَّلَاةَ وَيُؤْتُونَ الزَّكَاةَ وَيُطِيعُونَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ سَيَرْحَمُهُمُ اللَّهُ ۗ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَزِيزٌ حَكِيمٌ

The believing men and believing women are allies of one another. They enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and establish prayer and give charity and obey Allah and His Messenger. Allah will have mercy upon them, for Allah is Almighty and Wise. Surat al-Tawba 9:71

Most importantly, this level of brotherhood involves purifying the heart of all animosity, hatred, and malice for those who have faith, including for the righteous predecessors of Islam (al-salaf al-ṣālihīn), those who believed in the previous prophets, and the general masses of believers throughout all of history. If we want to succeed in this life and the afterlife, it’s important we become United in each community and in each family. Disunity is a source of destruction and hardship in life. To be continued in shaa Allah. _May Allah keep guiding us all and unite us under Quran and Sunnah_. Aameen.

Credit: Anonymous

HAVE YOU KISSED TODAY?

0

 

Former Pastor Michael Omojo now Abdulrahman was delivering a lecture at ACADIP Mowe lecture early this morning when he made reference to a verse of the New Testament which states thus:

Romans 16:16 Salute one another with an holy kiss. The churches of Christ salute you.

Funny enough, this is not the only reference in the Bible where such can be seen. Please read

1 Corinthians 16:20 All the brethren greet you. Greet ye one another with an holy kiss.

2 Corinthians 13:12 Greet one another with an holy kiss.

1 Peter 5:14 Greet ye one another with a kiss of charity. Peace be with you all that are in Christ Jesus. Amen.

1 Thessalonians 5:26 Greet all the brethren with an holy kiss.

When Muslim speakers do say that Paul’s teachings contradict that of Jesus Christ, is this not a clear proof of such contradictions? Jesus greeted or saluted thus:

John 20:21 Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.

Luke 24:36 And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.

Luke 10:5 And into whatsoever house ye enter, first say, Peace be to this house.”

John 20:19 On the evening of that first day of the week, when the disciples were together, with the doors locked for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!

John 20:21 Again Jesus said, “Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.

John 20:26 A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!“.

WAS THIS MODE OF GREETING EVER PRACTISED BY JESUS? …NO

Why then is Paul instructing Christians to do something Jesus never taught, practiced or instructed? Who inspired Paul to give such instruction Jesus never approved for his disciples nor his followers?

There are some evidences from the writings of Justin Martyr that the exchange of a kiss was a normal part of the Eucharist celebration.

Having ended the prayers, we salute one another with a kiss. There is then brought to the president of the brethren bread and a cup of wine mixed with water; and he taking them, gives praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and offers thanks at considerable length for our being counted worthy to receive these things at His hands. And when he has concluded the prayers and thanksgivings, all the people present express their assent by saying Amen.  (I Apol.65.2).

The writings of the early church fathers speak of the holy kiss, which they call “a sign of peace”, which was already part of the Eucharistic liturgy, occurring after the Lord’s Prayer in the Roman Rite and the rites directly derived from it. St. Augustine, for example, speaks of it in one of his Easter Sermons:

Then, after the consecration of the Holy Sacrifice of God, because He wished us also to be His sacrifice, a fact which was made clear when the Holy Sacrifice was first instituted, and because that Sacrifice is a sign of what we are, behold, when the Sacrifice is finished, we say the Lord’s Prayer which you have received and recited. After this, the ‘Peace be with you’ is said, and the Christians embrace one another with the holy kiss. This is a sign of peace; as the lips indicate, let peace be made in your conscience, that is, when your lips draw near to those of your brother, do not let your heart withdraw from his. Hence, these are great and powerful sacraments

{SERMON 227, The Fathers of the Church,(1959), Roy Joseph Deferrari, Genera editor, Sermons on the Liturgical Seasons, vol. 38, p. 197. See also: Sermon 227 in The Works of Saint Augustine: A New Translation for the 21st Century, (1993), Vol. 6, part, 3, p. 255. ISBN1-56548-050-3)

Augustine’s Sermon 227 is just one of several early Christian primary sources, both textual and iconographic (i.e., in works of art) providing clear evidence that the “kiss of peace” as practiced in the Christian liturgy was customarily exchanged for the first several centuries, not mouth to cheek, but mouth to mouth (note that men were separated from women during the liturgy) for, as the primary sources also show, this is how early Christians believed Christ and his followers exchanged their own kiss. For example, In his Paschale carmen (ca. 425-50), Latin priest-poet Sedulius condemns Judas and his betrayal of Christ with a kiss thus, “And leading that sacrilegious mob with its menacing swords and spikes, you press your mouth against his, and infuse your poison into his honey? “The kiss of peace was known in Greek from an early date as eirḗnē (εἰρήνη) (“peace”, which became pax in Latin and peace in English).The source of the peace greeting is probably from the common Hebrew greeting shalom; and the greeting “Peace be with you” is similarly a translation of the Hebrew shalom aleichem. In the Gospels, both greetings were used by Jesus – e.g. Luke 24:36; John 20:21, 20:26. The Latin term translated as “sign of peace” is simply pax (“peace”), not signum pacis (“sign of peace”) nor osculum pacis (“kiss of peace”). So the invitation by the deacon, or in his absence by the priest, “Let us offer each other the sign of peace”, is in Latin: Offerte vobis pacem (“Offer each other peace” or “Offer each other the peace”).

 

The practice remains a part of the worship in traditional churches, including the Roman Catholic Church, Eastern Catholic Churches, Eastern Orthodox churches, Oriental Orthodox churches; some liturgical mainline Protestant denominations; and Spiritual Christian, where it is often called the kiss of peace, sign of peace, Holy kiss or simply peace or pax; It is practiced as a part of worship in many Anabaptist heritage groups including Old German Baptist Brethren, and Apostolic Christian.

 

Who are Christians really followers of… Jesus or Paul? Are we to greet saying ‘Peace be Unto You’ as Jesus instructed or greet by Kissing each other mouth to mouth?

 

Funsho Animashaun @ Knowislam.com.ng

Misgoded reading continued

0

Click here for previous session

 

 

The Old Testament

[The Bible] has noble poetry in it; and some clever fables; and some blood­
drenched history; and a wealth of obscenity; and upwards of a thousand lies. —Mark Twain, Letters from the Earth, Vol. II
Let’s begin by putting “two of every sort (of animal) into the ark,” and then …
Oh, wait. Was that “two of every sort,” as per Genesis 6:19, or seven of clean and two of
unclean animals, as per Genesis 7:2­3?
Hmm. Well, we’ve got up to 120 years to think about it, because that’s the limit
of the human lifespan, as per God’s promise in Genesis 6:3. So, just like Shem …
Oops. Bad example. Genesis 11:11 states, “Shem lived five hundred years …”
Oookay, forget Shem. So, just like Noah … Double Oops. Genesis 9:29 teaches,
“So all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years; and he died.” So let’s see,
Genesis 6:3 promised a lifespan limited to a hundred and twenty years, but a few verses
later both Shem and Noah broke the rule?
Whoa, time out.

Let’s look at Old Testament dates from a different angle. Here’s Genesis 16:16:
“Abraham was eighty­six years old when Hagar bore Ishmael to Abraham.” Genesis 21:5
tells us, “Now Abraham was one hundred years old when his son Isaac was born to him.”
So let’s see, one hundred minus eighty­six, subtract the six from the first ten, nine minus
eight … I get fourteen. So Ishmael was fourteen when Isaac was born.
A bit later, in Genesis 21:8, we read, “So the child (Isaac) grew and was weaned.”
Now, weaning in the Middle East takes two years, according to ethnic custom. So tack
two onto fourteen, and Ishmael was sixteen before Sarah ordered Abraham to cast him
out (Genesis 21:10).
Fine.
So far.
A couple more verses, and Genesis 21:14­19 portrays the outcast Ishmael as a
helpless infant rather than an able­bodied, sixteen­year­old youth, as follows:
So Abraham rose early in the morning, and took bread and a skin
of water; and putting it on her shoulder, he gave it and the boy to Hagar,
and sent her away. Then she departed and wandered in the Wilderness of
Beersheba. And the water in the skin was used up, and she placed the boy
under one of the shrubs. Then she went and sat down across from him at a
distance of about a bowshot; for she said to herself, “Let me not see the
death of the boy.” So she sat opposite him, and lifted her voice and wept.
And God heard the voice of the lad. Then the angel of God
called to Hagar out of heaven, and said to her, “What ails you, Hagar?

Fear not, for God has heard the voice of the lad where he is. Arise, lift
up the lad and hold him with your hand, for I will make him a great
nation.”
Then God opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water. And
she went and filled the skin with water, and gave the lad a drink.”
A sixteen­year­old youth described as a “boy” or a “lad?” In a time and place
when sixteen year­olds were commonly married and awaiting their second or third child
while supporting a growing family? In addition to being hunters, soldiers and, albeit
rarely, even kings on occasion? Sixteen years equated to manhood in Ishmael’s day. So
how exactly did his father give the sixteen year­old “boy,” Ishmael, to Hagar? And how
did she leave him crying (i.e., “the voice of the lad”) like a helpless baby under a shrub?
And how, precisely, did his mother lift him up and hold him with her hand? Lastly, are
we truly expected to believe that Ishmael was so frail that his mother had to give him a
drink, because he was unable to get it himself?
Uh, yes, that’s the gist of it. That’s what we’re supposed to believe.
But wait, there’s more.
2 Chronicles 22:2 teaches that “Ahaziah was forty­two years old when he became
king….” Hunh. Forty­two years old. Hardly seems worthy of mention. Unless, that is, we
note that 2 Kings 8:26 records, “Ahaziah was twenty­two years old when he became
king …” So which was it? Forty­two or twenty­two?
Let’s take a hint from the Bible. 2 Chronicles 21:20 teaches that Ahaziah’s father,
King Jehoram, died at the age of forty.

Ahem.
King Jehoram died at the age of forty and was succeeded by his son, who was
forty­two? In other words, King Jehoram fathered a child two years older than himself?
Arithmetic, according to Mickey Mouse, is “Being able to count up to twenty without
taking off your shoes.” But between the reader’s toes and all appendages of the family
cat, there’s no way to make sense of these figures. And while the logical conclusion
approaches ramming speed, 2 Chronicles 22:1 points out that Ahaziah was King
Jehoram’s youngest son, for raiders had killed all Jehoram’s older sons.
So if Ahaziah was two years older than dear departed Dad, how many years did
his older brothers have on their father?
Obviously, 2 Chronicles 22:2 can’t be trusted and 2 Kings 8:26, which teaches
that Ahaziah was twenty­two when he became king, must be the correct version.
So King Jehoram died at forty (2 Chronicles 21:20) and was succeeded by
Ahaziah, who was twenty­two (2 Kings 8:26). Which means King Jehoram was eighteen
when Ahaziah was born, and roughly seventeen when he was conceived. Not only that,
but Jehoram had older sons (2 Chronicles 22:1), so he must have started his family at the
age of fifteen or less. So much for Ishmael having been a helpless lad at the age of
sixteen. It was a time when teenagers were men.
But what about 2 Chronicles 22:2, which states that Ahaziah was forty­two when
he assumed the throne?
A copying error, no doubt.
But that’s not the point.

 

 

…….continue reading……

FAVORITES

en_USEnglish