Home Blog Page 200

Trump backs drastic changes to legal immigration

0

Draft legislation seeks to give English-speakers priority for US residency and to halve the number of legal immigrants.

Trump hailed what he called ‘the most significant reform to our immigration system in half a century’ [Carlos Barria/Reuters]

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday threw his weight behind efforts to give English-speakers priority for US residency cards and halving the number of legal migrants admitted to the country.

 

Trump backed proposals that would reform the process of obtaining a US “green card” by introducing a points-based system favouring skilled anglophone workers.

Around one million immigrants are granted permanent residency each year, but the draft legislation – presented at the White House by Trump and two senators who crafted it – aims to cut that number by around 50 percent.

The bill would also eliminate the preference for US residents’ extended and adult family members, while maintaining priority for their spouses and minor children.

It would also put a cap on the number of refugees able to gain permanent residency at 50,000 a year.

OPINION: How Trump’s immigration policies could cost the economy

Trump hailed what he described as “the most significant reform to our immigration system in half a century”.

The legislation has only a slim chance of passing in congress.

It brought almost immediate rejection from influential South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who said he favoured a merit-based system but said this proposal would have a “devastating” impact on his state’s economy.

But Trump’s endorsement gave the White House an opportunity to show the president’s base supporters that he is trying to live up to his hardline promises.

Standing in the White House’s Roosevelt Room flanked by Senators Tom Cotton and David Perdue, Trump said that the United States had admitted too many low-skilled workers and claimed they were taking jobs from Americans.

“This policy has placed pressure on American workers, taxpayers and community resources,” he said. “It has not been fair to our people, to our citizens, to our workers.”

He pointed to the benefits of a Canadian or Australian-style points-based system.

Al Jazeera’s Heidi Zhou-Castro, reporting from Washington DC, said that many critics see Trump’s bill as representing a fundamental change in America’s self-ascribed philosophy of being a “melting pot” of cultures and nationalities.

“The words etched before the statue of liberty famously say: ‘send me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses’, and most opponents of this bill look at it and say it’s trying to re-write those words to say ‘give me your rich, your English-speaking, your highly-educated’,” she said.

“And although for Trump’s base those are encouraging words, for much of the rest of the country it does sound quite a bit off.”

‘White nationalist agenda’

“This competitive application process will favour applicants who can speak English, financially support themselves and their families and demonstrate skills that will contribute to our economy,” he said.

Trump said the new system, if approved, would “help ensure that newcomers to our wonderful country will be assimilated, will succeed and achieve the American dream,” while also protecting “struggling American families.”

Critics say that the proposals would actually result in falling wages, by slashing the number of migrants creating jobs.

The National Academy of Sciences studied two decades of data and found the impact of immigration on the wages of American-born workers to be “very small”.

OPINION: How Muslim Ban incites vigilante Islamophobic violence

The academy also concluded that “immigration has an overall positive impact on long-run economic growth in the US,” although first-generation immigrants do place more of a burden on state resources.

But Trump’s message is likely to resonate strongly with low-skilled white workers who have seen wages stagnate and believe their long-held cultural dominance is being eroded.

Trump has made tackling illegal immigration from Latin America a key plank of his presidential campaign.

 

Republican Party.

Cotton first introduced the proposals in February to the Senate, where they have been stalled ever since.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, an anti-discrimination group, said the plan “very much reflects a White nationalist agenda.”

“Its provisions reflect the shameful agenda of nativists and white nationalists who fear the growing diversity of our country,” the group said in a statement.

Al Jazeera’s Zhou-Castro said that – even though the bill unlikely to pass through congress – it is not a surprise that Trump would pick immigration as the next topic on which to expend political capital as it galvanised his base.

“This is a time when the White House has dealt with the Russia scandal, and a devastating healthcare [bill] loss, and it is in desperate need of a win,” she said.

“So it remains to be seen how far Trump will go in pushing this immigration policy.”

Source: Al Jazeera and news agencies

Cambodia jails Tammy Davis-Charles in surrogacy case

0

Woman imprisoned for 18 months after making hundreds of thousands of dollars from illegal surrogacy services.

Australian Tammy Davis-Charles told the court she had ‘lost everything’ since her arrest [Heng Sinith/AP]

A Cambodian court has sentenced an Australian woman to 18 months in prison for providing commercial surrogacy services in the impoverished country.

Cambodia banned the “womb for rent” business last year after Thailand and India – following a wave of scandals and allegations of exploitation – blocked foreigners paying poor local women to be surrogates.

Tammy Davis-Charles, who was arrested in November, appeared stunned as the judge read the guilty verdict and sentence on Thursday.

Two Cambodian associates were also handed 18-month jail terms. Samrith Chan Chakrya, who served as an interpreter for Davis-Charles, cried when she heard the verdict and said she would appeal.

The court also ordered Davis-Charles to pay 4 million riel, about $1,000, in fines to the state. The Cambodian defendants were fined 2 million riel ($500) each.

READ MORE: After Nepal, Indian surrogacy clinics move to Cambodia

Police said Davis-Charles moved from Thailand to take advantage of the demand for surrogates, charging Australian clients up to $50,000 for each request.

More than 20 Cambodian surrogates were brought into the trade and received around $10,000 each.

Surrogate pregnancy cause legal issues in Argentina

Judge Sor Lina said Davis-Charles was “aware that launching surrogacy services was illegal in Cambodia but she continued working and convincing Cambodian women to be surrogate mothers”.

Lina said Davis-Charles provided surrogacy services to 23 Australian and American couples and paid Penh Rithy $600 to $800 to organise paperwork for babies born through Cambodian surrogate mothers so that they could leave Cambodia with their parents.

Davis-Charles, who denied the charges, was also convicted of falsifying documents.

In previous court appearances, she said she had “lost everything” since her arrest and wanted to be reunited with her family in Australia, including her twin sons.

She has said she launched her business in Cambodia only after consulting three local lawyers who assured her the clinic was legal.

During the trial, several Cambodian women who served as surrogates said they were not coerced.

Developing countries are popular for surrogacy because costs are much lower than in nations such as the US and Australia, where surrogate services are around $150,000.

The surrogacy business boomed in Cambodia because of its cheap medical costs, a large pool of poor young women and no laws excluding gay couples or single parents.

After shuttering the trade in late 2016, authorities have refused to recognise birth certificates for babies, leaving many foreign couples in limbo.

However, in April this year, the government said it would allow foreign couples to return home with babies if they could prove they were conceived before the ban on commercial surrogacy.

After Cambodia’s crackdown, the trade has shifted to neighboring Laos.

Source: News agencies

Father of robotics team member killed in Herat attack

0

Fatemah Qaderyan, who shot to

fame by leading team travelling to

United States, grieving after

devastating loss.

Fatemah Qaderyan’s father was killed in the Herat mosque attack claimed by the ISIL [Al Jazeera]

The father of one of the Afghan girls who caught the world’s attention when trying to attend a robotics contest in the United States was killed on Tuesday in an ISIL-claimed attack at a mosque in Herat.

Fatemah Qaderyan, the 14-year-old Afghan robotics team captain, is “angry and grieving” following the deadly attack targeting Shia worshippers, the team’s coach, Ali Reza Mehrban, told Al Jazeera.

“Fatemah’s father could not survive the injuries and lost his life,” Ali Reza Mehrban, the team’s director, told Al Jazeera.

At least 32 people were killed in the attack, and more than 60 were wounded.

“[Fatemah] is very angry and is not eating or speaking to anyone, she is going through a very difficult time,” Mehrban said.

Qaderyan said in an interview in July at the The First Global Challenge international robotics contest that her father was her greatest support.

The team won a silver medal for “courageous achievement”, with judges praising the group’s “can-do attitude”.

The event in Washington in July attracted teams of teenagers from more than 150 nations.

But all eyes were on the squad of girls from Afghanistan, who had twice travelled 800 kilometres to the American embassy in Kabul, only to have their visa applications turned down.

They were finally granted entry with just one week to go until the event began after their story went viral.

Al Jazeera interviewed Qaderyan after the team was granted a visa.

“Afghanistan is a country at war and doesn’t have a lot of resources at hand. Other countries should consider this; they shouldn’t be so strict with us,” she told Al Jazeera in July.

Social media users offered condolences to Fatemah and her family.

Source: Al Jazeera News

At-Tauhid reading continued.

0

Click here for previous session

Important issues of the Chapter

1) Wisdom of Allah in creating jinn and mankind.

2) Worship is Tauhid, as, in this issue there had always been dispute (between the Prophets and the polytheists).

3) Those who have not fulfilled the requirements of Tauhid are such as they have not worshipped Allah, and in this sense is the meaning of the verse:
“Nor will you worship that which I worship” (109:3).

4) The wisdom in sending the Messengers.

5) The message of the Prophet (May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) (Tauhid) applies to all nations.

6) All Prophets have brought one and the same religion.

7) The major issue is that the worship of Allah cannot be performed until Taghut is denounced and rejected. In this meaning is the saying of Allah:

“Whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold.” (2:256)

8) At-Taghut is inclusive of all that is worshipped other than Allah.

9) The tremendous importance of the three entirely clear verses of Surah Al-An’am (6:151-153) among the early pious predecessors. In these verses are 10 issues, the first of which is the prohibition of Shirk.

10) The clear verses in Surah Al-Isra (17:22-39) have 18 substantial issues. Allah begins them with:
“Set not up with Allah any other ilah (god), (O man) or you will sit down reproved, forsaken (in the Hell-fire)”. (17:22)
And ended with:
“And set not up with Allah any other ilah (god) lest you should be thrown into Hell, blameworthy and rejected.” (17:39).
Allah informed us the importance of these issues by saying:
“This is (part) of Al-Hikmah (wisdom, good manners and high character, etc.) which your lord has inspired to you.” (17:39)

 

11) The verse of Surah An-Nisaa (4:36) called “The verse of the ten rights” to which Allah the Most High begins by saying:
“And worship Allah, and join none with Him in worship.”

12) We must note the admonition of Prophet Muhammad (May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) which he made before his death.

13) To recognize Allah’s right upon us.

14) To recognize the rights of slaves on Allah, if they fulfill His right.

15) This issue was unknown to most of the Companions of Prophet Muhammad (May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him)

16) Permissibility to hide some knowledge for the common good (as determined by the Shari’ah).

17) It is desirable to pass the pleasing news to other Muslims.

18) Fear of depending (of the people) upon the expansiveness of Allah’s mercy.

19) The statement of one, who is asked on matters that are not known to him: “Allah and His Messenger know the best”.

20) It is correct to impart knowledge selectively to someone and not to others.

21) The humility of Prophet Muhammad (May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) on riding a donkey with a companion behind.

22) It is legitimate to have a second rider behind.

23) Superiority of Mu’adh bin Jabal (May Allah be pleased with him) The great importance of this issue (of Tauhid).

Put your phone down and touch peopl's lives

0

We live in a time of advancement; pioneers in science and technology are making huge strides that will greatly impact our lives and the lives of the generations to come. Everything is either automated or in the process of being automated, hinting at a future in which robots could take over the world.

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning are common parlance amongst those involved in the tech sector and even amongst laymen who are passionate about these topics. Only a few decades ago, these advancements were considered fantasies but much of it is a conceivable reality now.

As humans living in structurally developed cities allowing us limited exposure to the natural world and its beauty we are heavily reliant on gadgets just to get on with our daily lives. There is an app for almost everything. Though this may be cause for celebration, it is also definitely a reason to be wary, as well. The aim of most gadgets and advancements is to make things easier and, as a result, save a person time. However, today’s generation of technology-dependent users complain that they have less time to do that which is truly meaningful.

Smartphones and social media have taken over our lives and it is quite the norm for people to live their lives online, seeking approval and fan following. Social media has exponentially increased the reach of our message and things going ‘viral’ are commonplace.

This has made the world a global village where people are instantly aware of something happening at the other end of the world. It has allowed families and friends living thousands of miles apart to speak with or share pictures and messages at any time of day or night.

In spite of these advantages, there is one prevalent drawback to such a phenomenon; the considerable lack of basic human face-to-face interaction. Paradoxically, in this age of global connectivity, people yearn for meaningful, real world interactions and relationships. The world is becoming a lonelier place for us all.

There are those with hundreds and thousands of friends on Facebook and millions of followers on twitter and yet they cannot find a couple of people with whom they can share their concerns or open up about their vulnerabilities. Lack of meaningful relationships and human touch has reached such a point that there is even a market for a ‘cuddling’ business for strangers to get cuddled by professional cuddlers for £55 per hour.

Empathetic people, too, are rare, especially in this age of self-interest and indulgence taking priority over everything and everyone else. Individualism has a firm footing in our society and we, as a community, have fallen into this trap as well.

It is prudent to note that, as Muslims, we should adopt a balanced path in life, including our use of social media. We should not make the mistake of shunning new things that come our way just because they are new. Our community has suffered decades of stagnation partly due to this and it seems that only recently we have realised the importance of using modern tools to enjoin good and make a positive impact on the wider society.

With that being said, however, it is preposterous that we should wish to change the world but cannot lend a helping hand to a relative, friend or neighbour in their time of need. It may be that their needs seem trivial or that there is no perceived value in pursuing them. It may be that your helping them gets you no ‘likes’ or ‘retweets’ or your deed may not go ‘viral’. But know that the reward that Allāh has in store for those “simple” actions far outweighs many other endeavours we might consider worthy of our time and effort.

People who suffer from depression or have suicidal thoughts usually have their condition exacerbated simply because they had no one around to talk to or with whom to share their worries and fears .
The greatest gift you can give someone is your time. – Rick Warren

Muhammad Ali, the famous sports personality and role model, once chanced upon a man about to jump to his death from a building in Los Angeles. He approached the man, spoke to him and encouraged him to come back to safety. What an amazing deed.

What follows are examples from aḥadīth of reaching out to fellow humans and the great reward it entails.

The Prophet (sall Allāhu ʿalayhi wa sallam) once advised ʿUmar (raḍiy Allāhu ʿanhu) to ask Owais al-Qarni to make duʿā’ for him if he had the good fortune of meeting him. Owais earned this high status simply because he used to treat his mother kindly and look after her.

Ibn ʿUmar (raḍiy Allāhu ʿanhu) said: The Messenger of Allāh (sall Allāhu ʿalayhi wa sallam) said: “ Jibrīl kept urging me that neighbours should be treated well such that I thought he would make them heirs.”

The Prophet (sall Allāhu ʿalayhi wa sallam) said, “He is not a believer whose stomach is filled while the neighbour to his side goes hungry. ”

Ibn ʿUmar (raḍiy Allāhu ʿanhu) reported: The Prophet (sall Allāhu ʿalayhi wa sallam) said,
“The most beloved people to Allāh are those who are most beneficial to the people […] Whoever walks with his brother regarding a need until he secures it for him, then Allāh the Exalted will make his footing firm across the bridge on the day when the footings are shaken.”

Reach out to people in the real world, put a smile on their face and build strong, meaningful relationships. This is what makes communities thrive. Daʿwah by actions has a far greater impact than Daʿwah just by words. Each of us is a representative of this beautiful din and we need to live up to it through our actions. Let us not talk about it all our lives in the virtual world without practicing it in the real world.

Notes:

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/12/neoliberalism-creating-loneliness-wrenching-society-apart

[2] http://www.parenting.com/news-break/woman-starts-cuddling-business-guess-how-much-sessions-cost

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFCH9QdMd2Y

[4] Al-Bukhari (6015) and Muslim (2625)

[5] Sunan al-Kubrā 19049 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al- Albani

[6] al-Muʻjam al-Awsaṭ 6192 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani

Credit: Muhammad Aftab
Ibn Islam. @Knowislam.com.ng

Misgoded reading continued

0

Click here for previous session

 

UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACHING GOD
We are all bound to the throne of the Supreme Being by a flexible chain
that restrains without enslaving us. The most wonderful aspect of the universal scheme of things is the action of free beings under divine
guidance. —Joseph de Maistre, Considerations on France

 

While monotheistic faiths share a fundamental belief in one God, their
understanding of His attributes differs greatly. Many of these differences, like individual strands of a spider web, may appear separate and divergent when viewed too closely.

 

However, these individual threads knit together a larger design, the full significance of which is recognized only when viewed as a whole. Only from a distanced perspective does the complexity of design become known, and the fact that each strand points to a central truth becomes recognized.

God’s Name

The difference between the almost ­right word & the right word is really a
large matter —it’s the difference​ between the lightning bug and the
lightning. —Mark Twain, Letter to George Bainton

A simple example of how several strands of evidence weave together a logical conclusion relates to the name of God.  Evidence taken from Judaism, Christianity, and Islam tie together to support a conclusion that should be acceptable to all three religions. For example, recognition of God as “the Creator” and “the Almighty” are  universal. 

 

Indeed, God is universally recognized by many beautiful names and glorious attributes.  When a person calls upon the Creator by any of His many beautiful names or perfect attributes, He is sure to hear the call. So what more is needed?

Well, for some people, a name. A definitive name is needed.
That the name of God in Islam is Allah should be of no surprise to anybody.

That a person might suggest that the name of God in Christianity is also Allah risks provoking consternation, if not violent protest, from the entrenched community of Western Christianity. But a visitor to the Holy Land quickly appreciates that Allah is the name by which God is known to all Arabs, Christians and Muslims alike. The Arab Christians
trace their heritage to the days of revelation in fact, their distant ancestors walked the same land as the prophet Jesus and they identify the Creator as Allah.

 

Their lineage prospered for 2,000 years in a land renowned for religious tolerance up until the creation  of the Zionist state of Israel (a little known fact, and one hugely distorted by the Western media), freely practicing their beliefs up to the present day. And they identify the Creator as Allah.

EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS ATTACKING ISLAM

0

Part of an email advising somebody who was being run down by evangelical Christians attacking Islam:

These people actively look for people who are all jittery when it comes to their emotional polemics against the Faith. They can sense who lacks confidence and self-esteem especially in person (body language) and even on the net with the way somebody is interacting.

There’s a lot of psychology behind evangelical Christian missionaries who try to rob Muslims of faith in the Revelation of Allah. They actively look for people who struggle with English because they think they are easier targets for various reasons (i.e. the Christian can conflate the West with Christianity and thus misappropriate secular Western achievement to Christianity, it’s easier for them to dominate and manipulate a conversation if the other person has a weaker command of the language and we both know that there is an undercurrent in the West which portrays people not educated in Western institutes as lesser thinkers), their ideal is those with inferiority complexes – inferiority complexes when it comes to the West and folks who have elements of self hate within them. A great way to deal with these missionaries is to go head on and use the premises in their arguments against them.

For instance, they will talk about the Prophet being involved in war and put it alongside the Jesus of the Gospel (A Jesus who was never the head of a state nor of a group large enough to wrestle control of the region away from the oppressive Romans so it’s the fallacy of false comparisons although if that’s what they want to do, be their guest and compare Prophet Muhammad with Trinitarian Jesus!).

The premise here is somebody using violence and warfare cannot be from God. Point at the Prophets in the OT – Moses – who used violence and warfare (e.g vs the Midianites in Numbers). But go further, talk about the Trinity idea teaching Jesus is the 2nd person of the Trinity thus Trinitarians essentially believe Jesus ordered the killing of women and children (1 Samuel 15:3).

Likewise, for the issue of polygamy, tell them Jesus did not forbid it according to Biblical Trinitarians and appears to allow it (Exodus 21:10) and he even says he GAVE David his wives according to Trinitarians (2 Samuel 12:8). In this instance you can also point to one of the sparks for their breakaway church movement, Martin Luther. Luther is on record saying nothing in Christian scripture forbids polygamy. [It will be a really Westernised Christian who brings the issue of polygamy up and he/she may find this very difficult and thus jump at the One Flesh verse (Gen 2:24) – they believe MOSES wrote such yet he had more than one wife so clearly the author’s understanding of the one flesh verse could not have been a proscription of polygyny].

Let’s talk about female slaves, they will bring this up. They may have even been taught to say Muslims are allowed to rape female slaves. Of course this is a prurient lie as part of their propaganda of demonisation (but the Christian you’re speaking to may not know this, so be gentle). To respond,say, “OK clearly you believe in the rights and well treatment of slaves, especially female slaves, I respect that as that is what we as Muslims are taught. But before I show you our teachings I want to share what Trinitarians believe Jesus allowed with respect to slaves, this may sound shocking so do look it up and think about it when you have some time later on, he allowed the severe beating of female slaves as long as they got up after a couple of days (Ex 21:20-21). Female slaves were taken as captives of war and married in the OT. There are some secularists, and perhaps liberal Christians, who say this was rape in the Bible but for me I don’t believe God allows rape as we are taught in the Quran (Quran 4:36) to treat slaves well and the Prophetic teaching (Sahih Muslim) is that one cannot even slap a slave – clearly rape would transgress those teachings thus cannot be allowed.”
Notice, what we’ve done my dear, we’ve started planting seeds and educating the Christian friend.

Don’t say any of this aggressively to them, say it how an educator would. You’re the teacher here. You’ve got to be the guide here. This Christian is in severe spiritual danger and his reckless elders may have effectively nudged him on to the precipice of leaving Biblical Christianity and the Abrahamic tradition.

Remember, if they come to you, your demeanour is key, you MUST be confident. Don’t be all jittery, they will sense it and that’s what they want to see. Speak with clarity and purpose. Be smart and informed, if you’re not, they will pick up on it and they will not be influenced as much by you, in fact they will take it as a cue to start influencing you! Be sophisticated and focussed, don’t bang on about America bombing Iraq like some emotional wreck – that’s not the time or place. The number of Muslims I see rattling on about Iraq, British and American imperialism in these discussions is staggering, to be honest it’s neither helpful nor relevant. It can come across as cringe-worthy and embarrassing. The Christian did not come to you as a representative of America, in many cases the Christian is not even American and is against Trump, Bush etc.. It’s a theological discussion, not political. There’s a time and place for remonstrating against the bombings of innocent people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, Pakistan etc. and the contentious issue of Palestine…this discussion is not that time or place.

Take on the role of the educator in the dialogue. The evangelical missionaries have been set up to try and rob you of your faith using secular arguments – their leaders saw how the secularists decimated Christendom in Western Europe and now they have borrowed that polemical style from them because it was effective against their own faith! The only reason why it was effective was because the Christians had been conditioned to think of Western civilisation and Western laws as the pinnacle thus the Church ended up allowing divorce (their teachings do not allow divorce except in the case of adultery), staying silent on sex before marriage and even inviting Bill and Bob, and Jill and Jean, to come into their churches to get “married”. They did all this to appease their congregations who became Westerners at heart rather than true Bible believers.

They’ve lost confidence in their Book. Don’t allow them to try and do the same to you with respect to Islam.

ALWAYS REMEMBER: These evangelical Christians have been conned, they’ve been conned by “Christian” folks who have given them a load of polemics against Islam which, if applied consistently, would mean the Christian would reject Christianity and Biblical teachings. These Christian missionaries, once they wake up and start thinking about what they’re saying, are in danger of leaving the Abrahamic tradition because their Christian leaders was set them up to stumble. The evangelical Christian NEEDS you in this instance. You can be a light for them and a light for their nations. But you’ve got to be smart, sophisticated, educated, confident and concerned. YOU can do it. 🙂

credit:Yahya Snow

Nafysah @ Knowislam.com.ng.

THE PERSON, NOT THE LOOK

0

By
Sanni K. Yusuf

Islam without morals is like living without life, talking without the tongue, body without limbs. The absence of emulative characters in the makeup of any muslim is like stew devoid of salt. Such will obviously make no experientially sumptuous delicacy.

Islam is sunnah. Sunnah, apparently, is attitude. Why? Because its emblem, Prophet Muhammad was an embodiment of how the muslim should healthily relate and socialise with people – muslims and non-muslims alike. What qualifies anyone to be ahlus-sunnah is character, not only the exalted look. Allah describes the holy Prophet as the best in character. Therefore, whoever lays claim to the sunnah (deeds) of the Prophet must correspondingly demonstrate sound, exemplary characters.

The possession and exhibition of good characters is an act of worship – respect for elders, reciprocity of same for the respecters, greeting appropriately, obedience to parents and constituted authorities etc. All these cum many more are the characteristics an ahlus-sunnah is expected to possess. It was in this vein that the holy Prophet said:
“Anyone whose religion (sunnah) and charater are pleasing to you may have your daughter’s hand in marriage…” Sunnah and character are inseparable twins as reflected in the aforementioned tradition. This therefore, implies that the physical outlook of sunnah isn’t the only required standard expected of a muslim. Good character, attitude, behaviour and any other alternative word preferred by you must go with it in pari pasu.

If any ahlus-sunnah is found wanton in character, he, the person is to blame, not the look – not the trousers, not the beard, not the hijab nor the niqab. Doing that is like blaming Islam for the shortcomings of a muslim. And no one does that except a cheer hater of sunnah and Islam. Why would you hate the sunnah? What for? If you hate the sunnah, you invariably hate Islam. You automatically hate the Prophet. Subhaanallah! Check yourself. Don’t get subjugated or defeated by shaytan. He is the whisperer of such a straying and destructive thought. Did I hear you say a’uudhubillaahi minash-shaytaanir-rajeem? You had better do.

Wearing the trousers to the middle of the legs (nisfus-saaq) or down to the ankles (ka’bayn) was not only instructed by the Prophet, it was well practised by him, together with his companions (the sahaabah) whose entry into paradise had been guaranteed even before their demise. Therefore, labelling one an extremist, even by fellow muslims, for that matter, on account of dressing sunnatically is as bad as doing name-calling on the Prophet himself.

You hate the sunnah-inclined trousers, but you loved that of late Michael Jackson whose trousers would even fly up above the ankles. You liked Michael’s style, but dislike Muhammad’s. Hmm! What a bad state of mind!

You passionately love Wizkid’s carrot trousers which fly up like that of Jackson despite placing the band beneath the waist in the name of sagging, but you hate Muhammad’s heavenly prescribed one. You don’t only wear the carrot trousers, you buy them for your children. But if any of them subscribes to that of sunnah, hell is let loose by you, because he has automatically become an extremist, a fundamentalist, or even a terrorist. Subhaanallaah! With Wizkid’s style, you are sociable. But with Muhammad’s, you are uncivilised. Hmm! What a sorry state of mind! Your situation is worryingly critical, because you are gradually oozing out of the can of faith – for detesting the sunnah – Islam invariably.

Dressing the sunnatic way is no licence to appear shabby like a scavenger. Islam abhors untidiness. The ahlus-sunnah should clad himself in the most elegant way. The clothes should be shiningly clean, exquisitely ironed with well contoured creases and worn so befittingly. If any practitioner of sunnah is dirty and rough, his person should be blamed, not what he represents.

Keeping beard is an integral part of the sunnah. In fact, it is one of the easiest ways to identify a muslim, even though there are copious persons today – muslims and non-muslims whose chins and cheeks are filled up with hairs, just for fashion. The Prophet of Allah did not only keep beard, he commanded the muslims to do same. It baffles to know that some people, muslims inclusive, despise you for keeping beard in the name of sunnah. When they see you bearded for Allah’s sake, you will get the most unbearable, unpalatable sobriquets of your life. Some may even liken you to an animal, thereby labelling you Mr Goaty. Meanwhile, these same people love Lionel Mercy’s so-hairy beard toped up with bushy moustache. Beard is okay on artistes, models – the so called celebrities, but that of Islam is display of extremism. What an injustice! What about Charles Darwin’s so-long, thick beard, or that of Wole Soyinka, the Nobel laureate? Those ones are okay, because they aren’t for Islam. Hmm! What a pity! What an egregious state of mind! While Jay Jay Okocha was still in active football, many people across the globe, including muslims, followed suit hook, line and sinker when he chose to keep beard for a style. He was a star. So it was okay.

Hijab is a beautiful garment that beautifully beautifies the beauties that beautify themselves with it. The cover is God-ordained – the same God that demands good character as a prerequisite to become inmates of the Paradise. Wearers of this divine garment aren’t angels. They are bound to commit behavioural blunders like any other hijab-less women. They are fallible. They may fall short of even acts that are inimical to their religion. Blame the person, not the look.

If the hijab wearer is loose and can tongue-lash anyone, blame the person, not the look.

If the niqab user is rude and can abuse anyone, blame the person, not the look.

If the man in sunnatic trousers treats his wife inhumanly and beats her indiscriminately, blame the person, not the look

If the bearded brother is unkempt and is usually badly attired, blame the person, not the look.

Saudi Arabia seeks to end US lawsuits over 9/11 attacks

0

Saudi Arabia claims plaintiffs cannot prove the kingdom supported those who carried out the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Saudi Arabia is being sued for billions of dollars by plaintiffs representing victims of the attacks [Robert Giroux/Getty Images]

Washington, DC – Saudi Arabia has asked a US judge to dismiss 25 lawsuits filed against it in relation to its alleged support of the September 11, 2001 attacks, court documents filed late on Monday afternoon show.

In a filing in US District Court in Manhattan, lawyers representing Saudi Arabia claim the plaintiffs – who represent thousands of victims who died and were injured in the attacks, as well as businesses and insurers – cannot prove the Gulf kingdom supported the al-Qaeda-affiliated men who hijacked and crashed planes into New York’s World Trade Center, the Pentagon outside Washington, and a Pennsylvania field. Nearly 3,000 people died in the attacks.

Saudi Arabia also claimed it deserved sovereign immunity.

James Kreindler, a lawyer representing those killed in the September 11 attacks, told Reuters news agency the filing was “expected … We have tons of allegations of what many Saudis and the country’s alter ego charities did. Saudi Arabia cannot hide from the facts.”

Saudi Arabia’s lawyers introduced several exhibits which they say support their claims. One such exhibit was an executive summary from the CIA dated to 2005, which says there was no evidence that Saudi Arabia supported the attackers.

NEWSUNITED STATES

Saudi Arabia seeks to end US lawsuits over 9/11 attacks

Saudi Arabia claims plaintiffs cannot prove the kingdom supported those who carried out the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Saudi Arabia is being sued for billions of dollars by plaintiffs representing victims of the attacks [Robert Giroux/Getty Images]

Washington, DC – Saudi Arabia has asked a US judge to dismiss 25 lawsuits filed against it in relation to its alleged support of the September 11, 2001 attacks, court documents filed late on Monday afternoon show.

In a filing in US District Court in Manhattan, lawyers representing Saudi Arabia claim the plaintiffs – who represent thousands of victims who died and were injured in the attacks, as well as businesses and insurers – cannot prove the Gulf kingdom supported the al-Qaeda-affiliated men who hijacked and crashed planes into New York’s World Trade Center, the Pentagon outside Washington, and a Pennsylvania field. Nearly 3,000 people died in the attacks.

Saudi Arabia also claimed it deserved sovereign immunity.

James Kreindler, a lawyer representing those killed in the September 11 attacks, told Reuters news agency the filing was “expected … We have tons of allegations of what many Saudis and the country’s alter ego charities did. Saudi Arabia cannot hide from the facts.”

Saudi Arabia’s lawyers introduced several exhibits which they say support their claims. One such exhibit was an executive summary from the CIA dated to 2005, which says there was no evidence that Saudi Arabia supported the attackers.

OPINION: 9/11 then and now: Terror, militarism, war and fear

But doubt has long circled over claims that Saudi Arabia wasn’t involved. It is known that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens, and several met with Saudi nationals with ties to their government, such as Omar al-Bayoumi, a Saudi national who has connections to Saudi diplomats.

A trove of declassified documents suggested evidence of collusion between the hijackers and Saudi Arabia described as “chilling” by investigators.

Congress initiated an inquiry on November 27, 2002 into the attacks. A report totalling over 1,000 pages was published in 2004. There were 28 pages left out of the report on the orders of former President George W. Bush, which became a source of controversy.

These pages were finally made public in July 2016, though no definitive answers arose, and further possible ties between al-Qaeda and the Saudi embassy in the US were uncovered, as phone numbers saved in the phone of an al-Qaeda operative captured in Pakistan were linked to Saudi consulates in the US.

Former Senator Bob Graham, the co-chair of Congress’s 9/11 Joint Inquiry and one of the voices alleging the Saudis and the hijackers were connected, told Politico he no longer called the US government’s actions a “cover-up”. That would be “a passive activity. What they’re doing now I call aggressive deception.”

The 25 cases were previously in danger of being thrown out, due to a legal inability for US citizens to sue foreign governments for support of extremist.

Then, in 2015, lawmakers introduced the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA), which made possible legal action against states that support terrorists who commit violent acts on US soil.

Then-President Barack Obama attempted to veto the bill after months of Saudi threats and lobbying, but the US Congress overrode Obama’s veto in 2016. The override was widely praised as a step towards justice for the victims of the deadliest attack on US soil in history by much of the US public.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs have until October 2 to file documents in opposition to the motion.

Lawyers on both sides declined Al Jazeera’s request for comment.

Source: Al Jazeera News

At-Tauhid (Oneness of Allah).

0

Allah the Almighty said:
“And I (Allah) created not the Jinns and men except they should worship Me (Alone).”   (51:56)

And He stated:
“And verily, We have sent among every Ummah (community, nation) a Messenger (proclaiming): ‘Worship Allah (Alone), and avoid (or keep away from) Taghut (all false deities etc. i.e. do not worship Taghut besides Allah).’ ”  (16:36)

And He said:
“And your Lord has decreed that you worship none but Him. And that you be dutiful to your parents. If one of them or both of them attain old age in your life, say not to them a word of disrespect, nor shout at them but address them in terms of honour. And lower  unto them the wing of submission and humility through mercy, and say: ‘My Lord! Bestow on them Your Mercy as they did bring me up when I was small.’ ” (17:23, 24)

And He said:
“Worship Allah and join none with Him in worship.” (4:36)

And He said:
“Say (O Muhammad May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him ): Come, I will recite what your Lord has prohibited you from: Join not anything in worship with Him; be good and dutiful to your parents; kill not your children because of poverty -We provide sustenance for you
and for them; come not near to shameful sins (illegal sexual intercourse, etc.) whether committed openly or secretly, and kill not anyone whom Allah has forbidden, except for a just cause (according to Islamic law),

 

This He has commanded you that you may understand. And come not near to the orphan’s property, except to improve it, until he (or she) attains the age of full strength; and give full measure and full weight with justice. We burden not any person, but that which he can bear. And whenever you give your word (i.e. judge between men or give evidence, etc.), say the truth even if a near relative is concerned, and fulfill the Covenant of Allah. This He commands you, that you may’ remember. And verily, this is My Straight Path, so follow it, and follow not (other) paths, for they will separate you away from His Path. This He has ordained for
you that you may become Al-Muttaqun (the pious).”

Ibn Mas’ud (May Allah be pleased with him) said: Whoever wishes to ascertain the very will of Prophet Muhammad (May the peace and
blessing of Allah be upon him) on which the Prophet has put his seal, let him read the Statement of Allah:
“Say (O Muhammad (May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) ): Come, I will recite what your Lord has prohibited you from: Join not anything in worship with Him… (up to) …And verily, this is My Straight Path.”

 

It is narrated that Mu’adh bin Jabal (May Allah be pleased with him) said:
I was riding behind the Prophet (May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) on a donkey and he said to me “O Mu’adh, do you know what is the right of Allah on his slaves and what is the right of the slaves upon Allah?” I responded: “Allah and His Messenger know best.”
He continued, “The Right of Allah upon His slaves is to worship Him Alone and never to associate anything with him. The right of slaves upon Him is not to punish any person who does not associate anything with Him.” I said: “O Allah’s Messenger, may I not give the glad tidings to the people?” He replied: “No. Do not inform them lest they rely on (this promise and lapse in
their service to Him)1
.” [The above Hadith is mentioned in two Sahih Books (Al-Bukhari and
Muslim)].

 

Click here to continue

FAVORITES

en_USEnglish