Home Blog Page 269

Egypt refers 48 to military court over church bombings (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

0

Chief prosecutor refers 48 suspects to military court for suspected involvement in deadly attacks on Christian churches.

Church blast in Tanta killed tens of civilians [Khaled Elfiqi/EPA]

Egypt has referred 48 people to the country’s military judiciary for suspected involvement in three deadly church bombings and accused them of joining the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL also known as ISIS) group.

Of the 48 suspects, 31 are in custody and 17 still at large, the public prosecutor’s office said in a statement on Sunday.

ISIL claimed responsibility for the three suicide attacks that targeted the churches in December and April.

Two deadly church bombings in Alexandria and Tanta killed more than 45 people in April, months after a bombing near Cairo’s Coptic Cathedral killed at least 25.

Egypt under emergency after Coptic church blasts

Public prosecutor Nabil Sadek said that some of the suspects held leadership positions in ISIL and formed cells in Cairo and the southern province of Qena to carry out the church attacks.

He added that they were also suspected of undergoing training at ISIL military camps in Libya and Syria

The suspects are also accused of killing eight policemen and wounding three at a checkpoint in the southwest on January 16.

Egypt is fighting ISIL-linked fighters waging an insurgency focused in northern Sinai.

Attacks were largely against security forces in the sparsely populated Sinai Peninsula in the past, but the armed group has spread its violence to the mainland and increasingly targeted Christian civilians in recent months.

Source: Aljazeera News agencies

Hamas decries Trump's terror allegation (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

0

Trump’s comments linking Hamas to ‘terrorism’ show his ‘complete bias’ towards Israel, says the group’s spokesman.

Hamas says its battle is against Israeli occupation, not the West [Reuters]

Hamas Movement has rejected US President Donald Trump‘s comments linking it to “terrorism” in his speech in Saudi Arabia, saying it shows his “complete bias” towards Israel.

“The statement describing Hamas as a terror group is rejected and is a distortion of our image and shows a complete bias to the Zionist occupation,” Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said in a statement on Sunday.

Barhoum dubbed the speech a “confirmation” that Trump is following the policy of previous US administrations.

Trump addressed the leaders of 55 Muslim countries in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and said they must take the lead in combating “radicalisation”.

“The true toll of ISIS [the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant], al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, and so many others, must be counted not only in the number of dead. It must also be counted in generations of vanished dreams,” said Trump in the speech.

Hamas says its battle is against Israeli occupation, not the West.

The movement presented a new political charter earlier this month that accepts the formation of a Palestinian state along the 1967 borders, without recognising the statehood of Israel, and says that the conflict in Palestine is not a religious one.

Trump’s speech came on the second day of a visit to Saudi Arabia, part of Trump’s first foreign tour that will take him next to Israel and occupied Palestinian Territories and then to Europe.

Palestinian activists call for protests against Trump

Meanwhile, Palestinian activists have called for a “Day of Rage” when Trump visits the West Bank on Tuesday.

The call for mobilisation was put out by a group calling itself the Supreme National Leadership Committee, which includes various Palestinian political factions, including Abbas’s Fatah movement.

The committee was set up in support of Palestinian prisoners on hunger strike in Israeli prisons.

Will China intervene in North Korea? 

The demonstrations are meant to draw attention to a month-long hunger strike by hundreds of prisoners being held by Israel and to protest what many Palestinians say is unfair US support for Israel.

In a statement, the group said on Sunday the Palestinian factions “affirm their rejection of the American position, which is biased in favour of the occupation”.

Trump’s visit to Israel and occupied Palestinian territories on Monday and Tuesday will be closely scrutinised as he seeks ways to restart peace efforts.

Khaled Meshaal: Struggle is against Israel, not Jews

Source: Al-jazeerah News agencies

Two Christians revert to Islam in ACADIP SOMOLU  Street Da'wah 

0

Four brothers, Yusuf Olaoluwa, Yusuf Ganiyu, Hassan and Abdulquddus Animashaun  from Academy of Islamic propagation (ACADIP), Somolu, Lagos state branch embarked on street Da’wah on 21st of may 2017.

They headed to Yaba College of  technology ( Yabatech) , Lagos state where they talked to six non-Muslims. Alhamdulillah, two of these people embraced Islam. It was reported that a bike rider collided with their car causing an accident on their way going to their destination. 

Blasts at Syrian rebel base kill 14 fighters

0

Two explosions hit an Ahrar al-Sham base in a village in east Idlib province, according to a monitoring group.

Ahrar al-Sham blamed the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) for the attack [Reuters]
Ahrar al-Sham blamed the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) for the attack [Reuters]

At least 14 fighters from the Ahrar al-Sham rebel group in Syria were killed by bomb attacks on Sunday, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group said.

Two blasts hit a rebel base in a village east of Saraqeb in Idlib province, the British-based Observatory reported.

Ahrar al-Sham said in a statement a lone attacker had driven a motorbike up to the building, detonating explosives attached to himself and a bomb on the bike at the same time, killing and wounding dozens of rebels.

It blamed the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as ISIS) for the attack. There was no immediate claim of responsibility.

Photos on social media showed bloodied corpses and a blackened motorbike outside a small building in the village. The pictures could not immediately be verified.

Idlib is a rebel stronghold, but some insurgent factions have fought among themselves this year, including in clashes that pitted groups aligned with Ahrar al-Sham against groups that joined the al-Qaeda-linked Hayat Tahrir al-Sham alliance.

Syrian government forces have taken advantage of rebel infighting, particularly a separate spat further south near Damascus, to recapture territory from rebels in the six-year conflict.

ISIL is opposed to all sides in the conflict.

Source: News agencies

Riyadh summit discusses ways of rooting out terrorism

0

Arab-Islamic-American summit condemns perpetrators that commit terrorist acts in the name of religion.

Trump said that the fight against extremists is "a battle between good and evil" [Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]
Trump said that the fight against extremists is “a battle between good and evil” [Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]

US President Donald Trump, leaders and representatives of 55 Arab and Muslim-dominated countries kicked off their Arab-Islamic-American summit in Riyadh on Sunday, focusing on unity in the fight against terrorism.

King Salman of Saudi Arabia was the first to address the summit, telling the gathering that Islam provided the best example for coexistence and “will always be the religion of mercy and coexistence”.

Trump in Riyadh: Controversy follows US president

King Salman highlighted that some people seek to present distorted picture of Islam.

“We all, peoples and countries, reject in every language and in every form damaging the relations of Muslim countries with friendly countries and profiling countries based on a religious or sectarian basis.”

In his address, Trump said that the US was seeking a “coalition of nations” in the Middle East with the aim of “stamping out extremism”.

Trump told the gathering that the overwhelming majority of victims of terrorist attacks were the “innocent people of the Arab, Muslim and Middle Eastern nations”, pointing out that “95 percent of the victims of terrorist attacks are themselves Muslims”.

‘Battle between good and evil’

He said that the fight against extremists is a battle between good and evil.

“This is a battle between barbaric criminals who seek to obliterate human life, and decent people of all religions who seek to protect it. This is a battle between good and evil,” Trump said

“This not a battle between different faiths, different sects, or different civilizations. This is a battle between those who seek to obliterate human life and those who seek to protect it.”

He added that the US was prepared to stand with those leaders in the fight against extremists, but that those countries should take the lead, urging them to drive extremists “out of your places of worship. Drive them out of your community. Drive them out of your holy land”.

“America is prepared to stand with you,” said Trump. “But the nations of the Middle East cannot wait for American power to crush this enemy for them.”

He also called on religious leaders to condemn attacks in the name of religion, but insisted that “this is not a battle between different faiths”.

The US leader, who has been accused of anti-Islamic rhetoric in the past, said he was not there to lecture: “We are not here to tell other people how to live… or how to worship. Instead, we are here to offer partnership  based on shared interests and values.”

“We must be united in pursuing the one goal that transcends every other consideration. That goal is to meet history’s great test to conquer extremism…,” he said.

Trump met with some of about 35 leaders from Muslim-majority countries gathered in Riyadh [Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]

Trump’s address was sensitive given tensions sparked by the Trump administration’s attempted travel ban targetting several Muslim-majority nations and his previous remarks on Islam.

“I think Islam hates us. There is a tremendous hatred there. We have to get to the bottom of it,” Trump said in a March 2016 interview with CNN.

Al Jazeera’s Hashem Ahelbarra, reporting from Riyadh after Trump’s speech on Sunday, said that the US leader’s tone was quite different.

“Trump reached out to the Muslim world with a new message, calling for peace, hope and unity. I think this is something that will resonate among Arab leaders, particularly those who were attending the summit today and their support is going to be crucial for the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL),” he said.

“Millions of Muslims who would be watching this speech will be totally surprised by a completely different tone by President Trump.”

First foreign tour

Trump’s speech came on the second day of a visit to Saudi Arabia, part of Trump’s first foreign tour that will take him next to Israel and the Palestinian Territories and then to Europe.

The first day saw the announcement of hundreds of billions of dollars in trade deals.

Among the agreements was an arms deal worth almost $110bn with Saudi Arabia, described as the largest in US history.

Trump met with some of the leaders from Muslim-majority countries gathered in Riyadh for the summit, including Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani, Bahrain’s King Hamad and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

He signed a memorandum of understanding with the members of the Gulf Cooperation Council on countering financing of terrorism. GCC includes Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain.

Egypt’s Abdel Fattah al-Sisi was one of the Muslim leaders who met Trump on Sunday [Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]

Source: Al Jazeera and news agencies

WAS POLYGYNY OR POLYGAMY APPROVED BY YAHWEH?!!!

0

Holy Polygamy

Men of the Bible with Multiple Wives
When you think of polygamy, what do you think of? The Mormons? Islam or Muhammad? Maybe you think of Big Love or the Yearning for Zion Ranch?

If you are a Christian, though, I want to give you something else to think of when the subject of polygamy comes up. You see, a Christian’s mind shouldn’t instinctively be drawn to the world, other faiths, or entertainment.

Instead, the Christian’s thoughts should gravitate to the Scriptures, to those men throughout the history of Judeo-christianity who lived out their lives with multiple wives, some with two or three, others with wives numbering in the hundreds.

I want to introduce you to these men.

For simplicity, I’ll present this list alphabetically. Also, I will from now on be referring to these men with the more specific term polygynist. Polygyny is the practice of one man having multiple wives; it is a type of polygamy.

Abdon

And after him Abdon the son of Hillel, a Pirathonite, judged Israel. 14And he had forty sons and thirty nephews, that rode on threescore and ten ass colts: and he judged Israel eight years.

Judges 12:13–14, King James Version

Alphabetically, we start our list with a man, Abdon, who isn’t explicitly said to be a polygynist. However, due to the large number of children he is said to have had, it is possible that multiple wives bore these children to him. If that is a correct assumption, then it is also worth noting that no negative remarks regarding Abdon’s relationships are made.

Abijah

But Abijah waxed mighty, and married fourteen wives, and begat twenty and two sons, and sixteen daughters.

2 Chronicles 13:21, King James Version

You should read the rest of chapter thirteen to get the full picture of Abijah; when you do, you’ll come away with the distinct impression that God was on his side.

You’ll find out that while Abijah was ruling over the kingdom of Judah, Jeroboam and the kingdom of Israel rose up against them. Jeroboam and his men stood under the careful, watchful protection of their golden calves and idols; Abijah and his men rose up under the watch, care, and protection of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

And what happened? “…God smote Jeroboam and all Israel before Abijah and Judah” (v. 15).

Despite all that we’re told about Abijah, it is telling that we’re never given a hint of disapproval regarding his having multiple wives.

Abram / Abraham

Now Sarai Abram’s wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar. 2And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the Lord hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai. 3And Sarai Abram’s wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife.

Genesis 16:1–3, King James Version
Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah.

Genesis 25:1, King James Version
The ESV Study Bible says of Genesis 16:3, “While the OT records occasions when particular individuals have more than one wife, such instances are almost always fraught with complications and difficulty. The taking of multiple wives is never encouraged in the Bible and usually arises out of peculiar circumstances.”

I wonder if the authors of that note have paid much attention to marriage in general: even monogamy is “almost always fraught with complications and difficulty.” That’s just the nature of human relationships!

Did any of those polygamist unions found in the Scriptures end in divorce? What about today’s monogamous marriages? I’m willing to bet that monogamous societies have a much higher rate of divorce than do polygynous ones. Why that would be, I cannot say for certain.

In any event, Abraham had at least three wives — two of which for certain were concurrent. An additional curiosity of this family was that Abraham’s taking of a second wife the idea of Sarai, his first wife.

That is a curiosity because it shows a great lack of self-centeredness on the part of Sarai; she knew the promise that Abraham would have children despite his age, and feeling as though the promise could not be fulfilled in her, she arranged for her own servant to be Abraham’s second wife, so that the promise could be fulfilled through her.

The study Bible notes that polygamy is never encouraged; notice here, though, that the angel of the Lord intervenes to mend the relationship between Hagar and Sarai but in no way expresses any sort of disapproval at the polygynous unions between Abraham and the two women (vv. 9–12)!

Ahab

And Ben-hadad the king of Syria gathered all his host together: and there were thirty and two kings with him, and horses, and chariots: and he went up and besieged Samaria, and warred against it. 2And he sent messengers to Ahab king of Israel into the city, and said unto him, Thus saith Ben-hadad, 3Thy silver and thy gold is mine; thy wives also and thy children, even the goodliest, are mine.

1 Kings 20:1–3, King James Version
We aren’t given details regarding these marriages, just that they exist: Ahab, king of Israel, had multiple wives, and a disapproving word from the prophets or God himself cannot be found.

Ahasuerus

Also Vashti the queen made a feast for the women in the royal house which belonged to king Ahasuerus.

Esther 1:9, King James Version
Ahasuerus’ situation, like Abdon‘s, is a bit speculative. Were all the women wives of Ahasuerus? Or were they handmaidens of the king? Or concubines?

In any event, we know that Ahasuerus was married to Vashti, and that later, she would lose her royal position to Esther (ch. 2). Were both women concurrent wives of Ahasuerus?

Whatever the situation, at the very least we can be certain that no disapproving words regarding polygynous marriages are spoken by God or his prophets in this situation.

Ashur

And Ashur the father of Tekoa had two wives, Helah and Naarah.

1 Chronicles 4:5, King James Version
Appearing in a much longer list of the descendants of Judah, we are told simply that Ashur had two wives. No disapproval. No stated need for repentance.

Belshazzar

Belshazzar, while he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which his father Nebuchadnezzar had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that the king, and his princes, his wives, and his concubines, might drink therein.

Daniel 5:2, King James Version
I admit that Belshazzar isn’t the best possible example, but he is a “biblical polygynist” nonetheless.

We are told of his drunkenness, of his idolatry — things which elsewhere are revealed to be against the Law of God.

That Belshazzar had multiple wives, though? That was a common practice among many cultures, just as it is today, and there is no sign that the practice of polygyny violated the law of God, nor is it within the context of this passage that his having multiple wives was in any way problematic to God.

Ben-hadad

We can infer that when Ben-hadad would take Ahab‘s wives, he would take them to be his own wives.

Caleb

And Caleb the son of Hezron begat children of Azubah his wife, and of Jerioth: her sons are these; Jesher, and Shobab, and Ardon. 19And when Azubah was dad, Caleb took unto him Ephrath, which bare him Hur.

1 Chronicles 2:18–19, King James Version
And Ephah, Caleb’s concubine, bare Haran, and Moza, and Gazez: and Haran begat Gazez.

1 Chronicles 2:46, King James Version
Maachah, Caleb’s concubine, bare Sheber, and Tirhanah.

1 Chronicles 2:48, King James Version
Caleb had at least two concurrent wives plus some concubines, and there is no sign that this wasn’t a normal, expected family structure.

The study Bible notes mentioned above said that polygyny was never encouraged; how is portraying something as perfectly normal not at least implied encouragement?

David

Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king’s son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife.

1 Samuel 18:27, King James Version
And when David heard that Nabal was dead, he said, Blessed be the Lord, that hath pleaded the cause of my reproach from the hand of Nabal, and hath kept his servant from evil: for the Lord hath returned the wickedness of Nabal upon his own head. And David sent and communed with Abigail, to take her to him to wife.

1 Samuel 25:39, King James Version
David also took Ahinoam of Jezreel; and they were also both of them his wives.

1 Samuel 25:42, King James Version
And the sixth, Ithream, by Eglah David’s wife. These were born to David in Hebron.

2 Samuel 3:5, King James Version
And David took him more concubines and wives out of Jerusalem, after he was come from Hebron: and there were yet sons and daughters born to David.

2 Samuel 5:13, King James Version
And Nathan said to David, Thou art the man. Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, I anointed thee king over Israel, and I delivered thee out of the hand of Saul; 8And I gave thee thy master’s house, and thy master’s wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things.

2 Samuel 12:7–8, King James Version
And David comforted Bathsheba his wife, and went in unto her, and lay with her: and she bare a son, and he called his name Solomon: and the Lord loved him.

2 Samuel 12:24, King James Version
David is the most significant man on this list thus far; not only was he the king of Israel, he is also the penman behind hundreds of chapters of Scripture.

And he was a man after God’s own heart (Acts 13:22).

Make no mistake that there was sin in David’s life. He committed adultery and murdered to get away with it. He was as human as the rest of us, yet he was highly favored by the lord.

And he was a polygynist.

It’s easy enough to attribute David’s problems to some sort of insatiable lust, but the Scriptures do not point us in that direction.

On the contrary, 2 Samuel 12:7–8 (quoted above) and the surrounding context show that David rebelled against the lord despite having multiple wives. The Scriptures go so far as to say that God himself gave David multiple wives and that, if they were not enough, he would give David even more!

According to the Bible, does God sin? Can iniquity be found in the him? Does God change?

Keep in mind that the ESV Study Bible said that the Scriptures never encouraged polygyny. What does it have to say about God giving multiple wives to David? “There is no other record of David marrying Saul’s wives, but he was certainly in a position to do so.”

Basically, they avoid the issue. When confronted with undeniable, incontrovertible evidence that polygyny is an acceptable practice, rather than admit such, the editors of the study Bible sidestep the issue. I hope you won’t make the same mistake when coming to your own understanding of what the Bible says regarding marriage.

Eliphaz

And the sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, and Gatam, and Kenaz. 12And Timna was concubine to Eliphaz Esau’s son; and she bare to Eliphaz Amalek: these were the sons of Adah Esau’s wife.

Genesis 36:11–12, King James Version
We are only told the name of one of Eliphaz’s wives, but what we are not told is that God disapproved of his family structure. We should not read into the Scriptures disapproval where none in fact exists.

Elkanah

Now there was a certain man of Ramathaim-zophim, of mount Ephraim, and his name was Elkanah, the son of Jeroham, the son of Elihu, the son of Tohu, the son of Zuph, an Ephrathite: 2And he had two wives; the name of the one was Hannah, and the name of the other Peninnah: and Peninnah had children, but Hannah had no children.

1 Samuel 1:1–2, King James Version
The ESV Study Bible actually makes sense in its handling of this passage, so I’ll defer to it: “Probably Hannah was Elkanah’s first wife, since she is named first. Presumably he married Peninnah because Hannah was barren; lack of an heir was a major problem in the ancient Near East, as in many other societies. Taking a second wife was one way to try to solve the problem (Gen. 16:2), as was levirate marriage. Elkanah’s pedigree suggests that it would be important to him to have an heir to continue the family and also that he was prosperous enough to afford a second marriage.”

If marriage was the only legitimate avenue of fulfilling the command to procreate, then how much more does polygyny allow this command to be fulfilled? We saw this sort of thing earlier in the case of Abraham; so that Abraham may have a child, his wife Sarai encouraged him to take Hagar to be his second wife.

Seems to me that polygyny is in fact an encouraged alternative to remaining childless. Curious, no?

Esau

And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite:

Genesis 26:34, King James Version
Multiple wives with no disapproval. Are you noticing a pattern yet?

I wonder if the authors of that note have paid much attention to marriage in general: even monogamy is “almost always fraught with complications and difficulty.” That’s just the nature of human relationships!

Did any of those polygamist unions found in the Scriptures end in divorce? What about today’s monogamous marriages? I’m willing to bet that monogamous societies have a much higher rate of divorce than do polygynous ones. Why that would be, I cannot say for certain.

In any event, Abraham had at least three wives — two of which for certain were concurrent. An additional curiosity of this family was that Abraham’s taking of a second wife the idea of Sarai, his first wife.

That is a curiosity because it shows a great lack of self-centeredness on the part of Sarai; she knew the promise that Abraham would have children despite his age, and feeling as though the promise could not be fulfilled in her, she arranged for her own servant to be Abraham’s second wife, so that the promise could be fulfilled through her.

The study Bible notes that polygamy is never encouraged; notice here, though, that the angel of the Lord intervenes to mend the relationship between Hagar and Sarai but in no way expresses any sort of disapproval at the polygynous unions between Abraham and the two women (vv. 9–12)!

Ezra

And the sons of Ezra were, Jether, and Mered, and Epher, and Jalon: and she bare Miriam, and Shammai, and Ishbah the father of Eshtemoa. 18And his wife Jehudijah bare Jered the father of Gedor, and Heber the father of Socho, and Jekuthiel the father of Zanoah. And these are the sons of Bithiah the daughter of Pharaoh, which Mered took.

1 Chronicles 4:17–18, King James Version

Verse 17 lists the sons of Ezrah with one wife; verse 18 details his family with his wife Jehudijah (or as some translations render it, his Judahite wife).

There are family details aplenty but not a word of divine disapproval.

Gideon

And Gideon had threescore and ten sons of his body begotten: for he had many wives.

Judges 8:30, King James Version
This passage doesn’t mince any words: Gideon had many wives. Plain. Simple. Unpunished.

Polygamy is Biblical

What comes to your mind when you think of polygyny? If this post was successful, you’ll now think of any of a number of men from the Bible. Perhaps most significantly, you should think of David, who not only was a man after God’s own heart, but was also a man to whom God gave multiple wives with the promise of more if desired.

I fully recognize that polygyny is a foreign concept to many people today, but in the midst of a society in which I see Christians using the Bible to browbeat homosexuals or anyone else who is “alt” or “other” in their sexuality, when we view the having of multiple spouses as bigamy, a crime with real punishments, it is all the more important to understand that the Bible which so many people point to in favor of their moral high grounds isn’t at all what the multitudes assume it is.

Yeah, the Bible (extremely unfortunately) condemns homosexuality. Yes, it uses (extremely unfortunate) misogynistic language.

But it also freely allows the having of multiple wives. (Unless you’re a Christian, in which case the only reason given for you to marry is if you can’t keep your pants on, but that’s another topic for another time.)

Iran election; what you need to know

0

Iran is holding its twelfth presidential elections. Political analysts and Middle East specialists are watching these elections very closely, but what impact will they have?

Why do Iran’s presidential elections matter?

 
Iran is a powerful country in the Middle East, and its stability and foreign policy affect its neighbours and have knock-on effects outside the region as well. Iran is involved in the Syria conflict, is closely tied to Hezbollah in Lebanon, and has interests in countries with sizable Shia populations, such as Iraq and Yemen.

And let’s not forget Iran’s nuclear programme, which earned it pariah status internationally and crippling economic sanctions that have squeezed its economy.

Incumbent President Hassan Rouhani was able to conclude the successful P5 1 negotiations in 2015, and according to this “nuclear deal” Iran would halt work on its nuclear programme in return for a lifting of the sanctions and the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Iranian funds.

Who are the main candidates?
Right now, the two strongest candidates are:

Incumbent Reformist President Rouhani, recognisable by his white turban. Rouhani is a Muslim scholar and lawyer with strong religious and revolutionary credentials, having preached against the Shah, changed his name to avoid detection by the secret services, and joined parliament after the revolution.
Rouhani was involved in secret negotiations with the US over the Iran Contra deal in the 1980s and in the P5 1 negotiations, which were successfully concluded during his presidency.

And

His Principlist challenger Ebrahim Raisi (recognisable by his black turban). Raisi is also a Muslim scholar and seen to be very close to the current Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Raisi was younger than Rouhani at the outset of the Iranian revolution, but he rose quickly through the ranks and has most recently worked as Iran’s prosecutor general.
Raisi has also been named custodian of Astan Quds Razavi, which is in charge of the Imam Reza shrine, the holiest shrine in Iran that controls the largest assets of any charity in the Muslim world.

Up until Monday, there were two other strong candidates in the race, Reformist First Vice President Eshaq Jahangiri and Principlist mayor of Tehran Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf.

They had strong showings during televised debates and on the campaign trail, but were seen as placeholder candidates and both had withdrawn by Tuesday evening.

Jahangiri announced his full backing for Rouhani and asked all those who supported him to vote for him as well, while Ghalibaf threw his support behind Raisi and asked his supporters to do the same.

 

What is the difference between a Reformist and a Principlist?

 
There are two main blocs in the Iranian political spectrum, Reformist and Principlist. Both, however, have their primary loyalty to the Islamic Revolution and the established order of Iran.

Reformists are the more liberal side, as they believe in opening Iran up to the world, liberalisng economic policy, encouraging foreign investment in the country, and focusing on the rights of Iranian citizens. By extension, this side of the political spectrum is very much pro the nuclear deal and the improvements it can bring to Iran and its people.

Principlists are the conservatives of Iranian politics.They are not in favour of liberalisation or opening up to the outside world, which puts them on the opposite side with regards to the nuclear deal as well, which they think was not the right instrument for Iran to sign on to, but have reluctantly agreed to support it.

During the campaigning leading up to the elections, they [conservatives] mentioned the nuclear deal often as an opening to attack Rouhani for not having delivered any major tangible improvement in the lives of everyday Iranians since the end of 2015.

 

 Watch – Iran Elections: Change or no change?  (13:04

Can a woman be president?

 
There has been a lot of dispute in Iran about whether or not a woman can become president. The constitution of Iran uses the word “rejal” [men in persian] to refer to the acceptable candidates, stating in Article 115 that a president is to be elected from among “religious and political rejal”.

The Guardian Council, which is an appointed body, is responsible for vetting all nominees for the presidential election and allowing only those that it sees as acceptable to run. They have so far held to the opinion that the word “rejal” in the constitution refers only to men.

This year, 73-year old Azam Taleghani registered to run for the presidency for the third time (first time was in 1997, second time in 2009). Her candidacy has been rejected by the Guardian Council every time but Taleghani, who is the Secretary General of the Islamic Revolution Women’s Society, has vowed to keep up her fight to demand that the Guardian Council revise their strict interpretation of the constitution, arguing that “rejal” can also be interpreted as “personalities” and does not have to mean “men”

What is the state of Iran’s economy?

 
Iran’s economy has taken a beating under the sanctions regime, with inflation running rampant, unemployment in the double digits, and no hope on the horizon for a number of years. With the signing of the nuclear deal, billions of dollars of Iranian funds were released and oil sales began to prop up the economy.

So far the improvements have been felt mostly in terms of a reduction of inflation (from 40 percent to 7.5 percent) and pulling the growth rate out of the negative up to 7 percent.

One side of the economy where there hasn’t been an improvement so far is unemployment, as Iran still hasn’t been able to attract the international investment that would mean job creation.

International investors have been a bit skittish with Iran so far, discouraged by the difficulty of doing business in a country where the economy is largely monopolised by enormous government and quasi-governmental businesses and bodies, including the religious endowments and projects run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

In order to open Iran up to investments, the new president would have to continue the effort begun by Rouhani and his administration. This effort would include reducing red tape that strangles new company registrations, and loosening the hold that the big players have on the Iranian economy so that new companies can enter the market and compete.

 

Can women vote in the elections?
Yes of course. Of Iran’s estimated 81.8 million population, 49 percent are women. Iranian women won the right to vote in 1963 and were allowed to stand for public office. In November 2016, about 6 percent of Iranian parliament members were women.

How many people vote?

 
About 55 million Iranians are eligible to vote in the elections, and they will be able to do that in any one of 63,000 polling stations, which will be monitored by 1.5 million staffers, 70,00 monitors and a scalable force of 350,000 security personnel. Candidates can assign a monitor of their choice to observe proceeding at each station.

A big turnout on Friday, estimated at more than 40 million out of 56 million registered voters, led to the vote being extended by several hours to deal with long queues.

What time are the elections results?

The minister of the interior has announced that the results of the election will not be announced in stages this year, rather they would be made in one final announcement at the end of counting. He does not predict a second round of runoff voting this year, given that the two leading candidates have been supported by 11th hour alliances that have strengthened their campaigns and reduced the chances of vote splitting.

Will the elections affect Iran-US relations?

 
This is a big question, but it’s not actually clear that the victory of one candidate or another would change the course of this relationship.

US President Donald Trump has stated repeatedly that he does not agree with the terms of the nuclear deal and that he thinks it was a very bad agreement for the US to sign.

In this, Trump sounds a lot like the Principlist bloc in Iran, who also feel that the nuclear deal was a bad idea for Iran, although they did state during the presidential debates that they would respect it as a national accord.

If either Iranian bloc respects and maintains the nuclear deal, there should be no major irritants to the relationship coming from the Iranian side. Nor will there be any major shift in Iranian regional policy, which is largely guided by the Supreme Leader, rather they will continue as they are today.

All of the above means that any major shift in relations would come from the US side. In a surprise move on Wednesday, Trump passed up a chance to derail the deal, a move analysts said reflected business interests at home and diplomatic relations abroad.

With regards to regional reach and politics, the US is seen to be aligning itself closely with Saudi Arabia these days, which has had and will continue to have an effect on Iran as both countries talk about containing Iran’s reach in the region.

Could the new president turn his back on the nuclear deal?

Given the statements made by the Principlist bloc candidates during the debates, this is not likely to happen unilaterally. If the US were to make moves to back out of the nuclear deal, then Iran may well reciprocate, but that remains to be seen. There is one step before “turning their back” on the deal, namely renegotiation, which either Iran or the US could call for.

Where do the candidates stand in relation to Saudi Arabia and Israel?

No Iranian president will stray from Iranian policy that opposes Israel’s occupation of Palestine. Last February, Iran hosted the International Conference on the Palestinian Intifada, an event it has been hosting every four years since the 1990s.

During the conference the Supreme Leader called for a new uprising against Israel, and Rouhani expressed Iran’s resolve to continue supporting the Palestinian cause in spite of the “heavy price” paid by the Islamic Republic.

With regards to Saudi Arabia, Rouhani outlined in January the reasons that stood in the way of a more cordial relationship between Iran and the Kingdom, namely the war Saudi Arabia is pursuing in Yemen, and Saudi interference in countries such as Bahrain.

Another reason for tensions between the two countries is Saudi support for the People’s Mujahedin of Iran (Mujahedin-e khalq, or MEK) who are calling for an overthrow of the current government in Iran.

 

 Watch: Has Rouhani succeeded in reforming Iran? (12:00)

How will the election’s results affect the Middle East?

 
It’s not likely that the election’s results will change much in terms of Iran’s regional behavior, as its involvement in a number of relationships and conflicts is set.

The Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, not the president, has final say in all matters and is commander in chief of the armed forces. This means that Iran will remain on the regional path it is on today, focused on its involvement in Syria and the sectarian tension in the region.

A historical antagonism to anything that seems like the US dictating to Iran also adds to Iranians’ feeling that the government should act in the best interest of Iran and its regional allies.

iran election explainer process

 

Source: aljazeera.com

What not to say about Ramadan!

0

Stop saying that the reason Muslims fast during Ramadan is to “feel the way poor people feel”!!!

If that were true, then Allah SWT wouldn’t have made fasting mandatory upon the poor as well!!

Also, poor people weren’t placed on this Earth to teach you to be appreciative; stop
centering the purpose of their existence around you.

Can you learn from them? Of course. But is that their sole purpose in life? Of course not.

So addressing the actual reason as to why we fast…

There’s only one section in the Quran that discusses the PURPOSE of fasting. All other verses discuss legalities.

The Arabic word “لعلا” has two meanings:
1. So that…

2. Hopefully…

So the verse is basically saying, “Oh you who have believed, fasting has been decreed upon you as it was decreed upon those before you SO THAT/ HOPEFULLY you will attain Taqwa.”

The word ‘taqwa’ comes from the Arabic root word “وقاية” which literally translates to “protection”.

So basically we fast in order to HOPEFULLY attain protection. The fact that it says “hopefully” means that we won’t all attain this goal or achieve this purpose, but there is hope that we will.

Okay, so protection from what exactly?

*From landing ourselves in trouble.

*From committing sins.

*From disappointing Allah.

*From disappointing ourselves.

The relationship between fasting and taqwa is psychological and spiritual, but the actual act of fasting is physical.
Even if you’re not a spiritual person, you’re gonna FEEL that thirst, you’re gonna FEEL that hunger.

Fasting is a physical battle between your body and your heart. Your body aches for that sip of water or that morsel of food, but your heart says no; fasting is when you hand over the reigns to your heart and place it in control.

This extends to all other urges and desires as well. From sunrise to sundown, certain things become haram to us (food, water, intercourse, etc) and we have to wait until they are halal for us again.

We won’t always succeed, that’s why the verse says “hopefully”. But we’re given 30 consecutive days to work on strengthening our heart.

Now normally, Shaytan is the primary marketer for all that is haram and forbidden. But during Ramadan, he is locked away. Why?

Well think of it this way. When you train as a firefighter, you don’t run into the first burning building you see and try to save everyone, including yourself.

You go through some simulations first without the actual fire. You have to train before going out and facing the real danger.

Ramadan is the same way. Allah has removed Shaytan from the picture so that you can “train” yourself for 30 days, because after Ramadan is when you have to go out and face the real world and its real dangers.

– Nehal Ahmed Abdullah

Canvassing FOR THE PURCHASE OF A DA'WAH TRUCK⛟

0

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

 

A special appeal to the
Muslim Ummah???

“And whatever you spend in charity or devotion, be sure Allah knows it all…” (Qur’an,2:270)
For over Twenty-two years, Academy of Islamic Propagation (ACADIP) has been actively involved in calling Non-Muslims to the Way of ALLAH with wisdom and logical reasons. Alhamdulillah, our efforts had been crowned with several thousands of Reverts into the fold of Al-Islam.
However, with the ardent support of the highly spirited Muslims around the Globe, (by ALLAH’s Grace), we have been able to achieve so many a physical Success. An 18-Seater Da’wah Bus was procured in October 2015 with several millions of Naira, thus, alleviating our transportational logistical problem.
Ten months after the procurement of this Da’wah Bus, a Fund Raising Drive for the purchase of “State of the Art” Da’wah Equipment, was set in motion, and by ALLAH’s mercy, in less than Six months, we achieved the Goal ! We are now in possession of sets of Da’wah Instruments (Public Address & Illumination Systems, Heavy-Duty Generators, Stage, Projector, etc)_ worth of over Ten Million Naira. It was a Roaring Success for us. Alhamdulilah…
Consequently, since November 2016 that we have procured these Multi-million Naira Instruments, we have been confronted with the challenges of transporting them into different places of our Lectures, due to lack of a suitable DELIVERY TRUCK. Hence, we relied solely on rented Trucks at the expense of the Organisation. What a heavy financial commitment !!!
Praise Be Unto Allah! Few weeks ago, we took a Pragmatic Decision by venturing into procuring a DELIVERY TRUCK for moving our Da’wah Equipment. Alhamdulillah, out of the N5,200,000 (Five Million, Two Hundred Thousand Naira) cost of the Truck, we have been able to pay a sum of N5,200,000 (Two million, Seven Hundred Thousand Naira) to the Truck Dealer, courtesy of some Spirited Muslims, Members of Board of Trustees, and the Monthly Support Scheme.
We are now humbly soliciting for the Balance of N2,500,000 (Two Million, Five Hundred Thousand Naira) to enable us take a timely Delivery of the Truck. May ALLAH amply reward you in this World and the Hereafter. Aamiyn.

Our Bank Account is:
*FIRST BANK*
*ACADIP NIGERIA*
*2017481524*

For more information, kindly contact:
+234 806 213 5408
+234 701 577 9491
+234 909 549 9803

©ACADIP NIGERIA

 

.

TIME ZONE! TIME ZONE!! TIME ZONE!!!

0

TIME ZONE! TIME ZONE!! TIME ZONE!!!

 

 

New York is 3 hours ahead of California but it does not mean that California is slow, or that New York is fast. Both are working based on their own TIME ZONE;

 

Someone is still single. Someone got married and waited 10 years before having a child. There is another who had a baby within a year of marriage;

 

Someone graduated at the age of 22, yet waited 5 years before securing a good job; and there is another who graduated at 27 and secured employment immediately;

 

Someone became CEO at 25 and died at 50 while another became a CEO at 50 and lived to 90 years. Everyone works based on their TIME ZONE;

 

People can have things worked out only according to their pace.

Work in your TIME ZONE;

 

Your Colleagues, friends, younger ones might seem to go ahead of you. May be some might seem behind you;

 

Everyone is in this world running their own race on their own lane in their own time. Allah has a different plan for everybody. TIME ZONE is the difference. Obama retires at 55, Trump resumes at 70;

 

Don’t envy them or mock them, it’s their TIME ZONE. You are in yours;

 

Hold on, be strong, and stay true to yourself;

 

All things shall work together for your good;

 

You’re not late… You are not early… You’re in Your TIME ZONE.

 

 

“Maaa asaaba mim musee batin fil ardi wa laa feee anfusikum illaa fee kitaabim min qabli an nabra ahaa; innaa zaalika ‘alal laahi yaseer”

 

“Likailaa taasaw ‘alaa maa faatakum wa laa tafrahoo bimaaa aataakum; wallaahu laa yuhibbu kulla mukhtaalin fakhoor”

 

“No disaster strikes upon the earth or among yourselves except that it is in a register before We bring it into being – indeed that, for Allah , is easy”

 

“In order that you not despair over what has eluded you and not exult [in pride] over what He has given you. And Allah does not like everyone self deluded and boastful”

 

|| Surah Al-Hadid 57:22-23 ||

FAVORITES

Middle east

#Pray4Burma

0
Articles On Islam

LOVE

0
en_USEnglish