Home Blog Page 214

MSSN FUTMINNA Annual Da'wah / Sister's Week

0

MUSLIM STUDENTS’ SOCIETY OF NIGERIA (MSSN Federal University Of Technology Minna (FUTMINNA)

 

Presents ANNUAL DA’AWAH / SISTERS’ WEEK

 

Date: 25th – 29th Shawwal 1438 A.H (Wed. 19th – Sun 23rd July, 2017)

 

 

Theme: SUPRALIMINAL…. (Beyond Philosophical thoughts)

 

DAY 1…

 

Date: 25th Shawwal 1438 A.H (Wed. 19th July, 1438)

Topic: Before End O’ Clock

Lecturer: Mallam Bashir Usman, Yankuzo (Chief Imam)

Venue: Agric LT G.K.

Time: 8:00pm

 

 

DAY 2…

 

Date: 26th Shawwal 1438 A.H (Thur. 20th July, 1438)

Topic: The 3Cs: Couple Counselling Clinic

Lecturer: Sheikh Nurudeen Lemu

Venue: D.H Bosso

Time: 8:00pm

 

 

DAY 3…

 

Date: 27th Shawwal 1438 A.H
(Fri. 21st July, 1438)

Topic: Jesus Christ: A son, Not a son

Lecturer: Sheikh Husseini Mabera

Venue: LT 2 G.K

Time: 8:00pm

 

 

DAY 4…

 

Date: 28th Shawwal 1438 A.H
(Sat 22nd July, 1438)

Topic: UnParalleled Gem: Charting The Course

Lecturer: Mallam Maimuna Tyabo

Venue: NLH 1 Bosso

Time: 4:00pm

 

 

DAY 5…

 

Event1: SUPRALIMINAL …Beyond Philosophical thoughts

Lecturer: Abu Tufail

Venue: LT 2 G.K.

Time: 9:00am

 

 

Event2: Launching of Crescent Magazine.

Time: 11:00am

 

 

Event 3: Inauguration of New Executives.

Time: 12:00 noon

 

 

 

MSSN….. advocating positive values

 

For enquiries, Contact: +2348164547849, +2349031590533

Protesters in Paris rally against Israeli PM's visit

0

The French leader’s decision to invite Benjamin Netanyahu to Paris is ’embarrassing’, say demonstrators.

Protesters condemned the Israeli settlement policy and the blockade of Gaza [Michel Euler/AP]
Protesters condemned the Israeli settlement policy and the blockade of Gaza [Michel Euler/AP]

Protesters in the French capital have criticised President Emmanuel Macron for inviting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Paris, condemning the Israeli settlement policy and the blockade of Gaza.

Olivia Zemor, president of the EuroPalestine association, told the AP news agency on Saturday that “rolling out the red carpet” to someone she said violated international conventions did not send the right signal and was “embarrassing”.

“We called for this protest, we protest Emmanuel Macron’s invitation to Netanyahu and his rolling out of the red carpet to a criminal, a torturer – the torture of men and children exists – a land thief, to someone who does not respect international law and human rights, which is embarrassing,” she said.

Yassine Blicqy, 19-year-old protester from Valenciennes, said: “I hope that France, in the next few years or even decades, will choose justice and will side with the oppressed peoples because that’s what France is about. It’s not oppression, it’s freedom and human rights, it’s diversity and equality, and we must give an example.”

Macron invited Netanyahu to take part in a commemoration on Sunday of a mass deportation of French Jews to Nazi camps 75 years ago.

The event commemorates one of the most shameful moments of French collaboration with the Nazis.

On 16-17 July 1942, French police rounded up about 13,000 Jews, including about 4,000 children, around Paris and herded them into the Vel d’Hiv cycling stadium before they were sent to camps.

Fewer than 100 survived.

 

Source: AP news agency

Who was that prophet John 1:19-21

0

WHO WAS THAT PROPHET? John 1:19-21

In New Testament, we find that the Jews were expecting the fulfilment of the prophecy “ONE LIKE MOSES” in Deuteronomy 18:18.

When Jesus (pbuh) claimed to be the Messiah of the Jews, the Jews began to enquire as to where was Elias? The Jews had a parallel prophecy that before the coming of the Messiah, Elias must come first in his second coming. Jesus (pbuh) confirmed this Jewish belief:

11. And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.

12. But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them.

13. Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.
Matthew 17:11-13

In the above stated verses, Jesus Christ claimed John the Baptist to be Elias while John the Baptist denied being what Jesus ascribe him to be:

And they asked him, What then? ART THOU ELIAS? And he saith, I am not. John 1:21

one of the two (Jesus or John) ‘God forbid’ is definitely not speaking the truth.

We Muslims know John the Baptist to be Hazrut Yahaha (Alai-his-salaam). Jesus Christ is known to us as Isah (Alai-his-salaam). How can we impute lies to either of them.
We leave this problem between Jesus and John for the Christians to solve.

WHO ARE THE EXPECTED PROPHETS

We realise that the Jewish elite (who included experts in the Torah) believed there were three SEPARATE individuals to come, namely Elijah, Christ and “the Prophet”.

Nowhere in the Gospel of John we find any statement negating the view of the Jewish elite, no quote from John the Baptist, Jesus or even the narrator of the Gospel.

The Christian scholars sometimes present the Christ and “the Prophet” to be the same person. This is not in the Biblical text at all and thus becomes an unauthorised addition on their part.

The Jewish elite question John the Baptist, he tells them that he is not the Christ and they proceed to ask him whether he was Elijah or “the Prophet”. What we glean from this text is that the Christ, Elijah and the Prophet are three SEPARATE people and thus the Jews who were questioning John the Baptist were expecting the arrival of three distinct figures in the future; Elijah, the Christ and the Prophet.

It should also be noted that John the Baptist did not question the Jews concerning “the Prophet” and nor did he seem perplexed once questioned about “the Prophet” which suggests he (John the Baptist), like the Jews, was aware of a Prophet to come who is not Jesus (the Christ).

In their investigations they underwent intense difficulties in other to find their true Messiah

The Christian scholars methodology of exegesis was, they seemed bent on manipulating the Bible rather than allowing the passage to speak for itself. Of course if we allow it to speak for itself we realise that “the Prophet” is distinct from the Christ and this leads to the question; who is “the Prophet”?

But the learned Christians somehow only see two questions implied here. To make clear that the Jews definitely had THREE separate prophecies in their minds when they were interrogating John the Baptist (pbuh). let us read the following verses:

19. And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, WHO ART THOU?

20. And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I AM NOT THE CHRIST.

21. And they asked him, What then? ART THOU ELIAS? And he saith, I am not. ART THOU THA PROPHET? And he answered, No.

John 1:19:21 KJV

Three questions!
Please note that three different and distinct questions were posed to John the Baptist (pbuh) and to which he gave three emphatic “NO’S” as answers.
To recapitulate
(1) ART THOU THE CHRIST?
(2)ART THOU ELIAS?
(3)ART THOU THAT PROPHET?

Read more here

Opinion : Buhari Ọmọ Musa : The Church, the concern and TAWHEED.

0

RE: A MUSLIM ENTERING THE CHURCH: THE

 

Praise be to Allaah and may His perfect blessing be upon the soul of His last messenger, his household his companions, the scholars upon the truth as well as those who follow them on the path.

As regards the write up ” A MUSLIM ENTERING THE CHURCH….”, may Allah bless the writer and increase him in knowledge. It is a wonderful effort he made to gather what the scholars have said regarding entering of church. However, he did not addressed what really went wrong with the event.

Firstly, it should be noted that the criticism that greeted the viral clip of Buhari’s appearance in the celestial church was not basically due to his entering the church as purported. The matter is much further beyond that. Although his going to the church wasn’t appropriate as shall be shown soon insha Allah, the evil blunder he committed was the main cause of reprehension. This however was just passed over by the writer as he only commented on it in two lines. He rather expounded on the fiqh of “entering” the church. At the end he only identified one statement amidst many statements which constitue disbelief in the clip.

The core of the event which I think should be crushed is the various terrible utterances he made during the shameless display. He battered and shattered the marrow of tawheed – monotheism. He made utterances which take one out of the fold of al-Islam, if rooted in the heart. This is so important because of many innocent eyes and hearts who have watched and received the messages he passed either directly or inferentially. More especially in a society where people know not right from wrong in matters of tawheed!

To be brief, here are some of his statements of kufr he said:

1. He affirmed that both Islam and Christianity are the same because they both agree to the existence of God. He said: “egba fun olohun. E gba pe olohun lo’olohun nje. Ki lowa seku ta’ni jo se waasi….” – *you submitted to Allah and believe He is God*. So why won’t we have admonition together.

2. After he greeted Mr Abdulkareem owoduni he said: “Eku igbe ti Olohun dani” – you are well done for doing God’s work. What was clear from the clip is that the man is a christian and a leader in the church. In the 10:49 clip, he mentioned that the man was once a Muslim before he converted to Christianity.

3. He said: “jesu o se iyanu ni ile aye yin o. In the*mighty name of jesus* you’ll be blessed”.

4. Awa musulumi ati Christian Nigeria. E yo kan ni wa, a o le ja laye laye. A won ti e bari ti won ba unja, won si ere ni, won le ri Eni wo wan san lailai – We Nigerian Muslims and Christians are one, we cannot disagree (fight), anyone you see that fights (disagree on religious issue) is MAD and can never get remedy!

On the first point, it is wrong to hold that since the Christians believe there’s God almighty then we are one and hence we should do things together. A lot of Muslims so much belive in this that they celebrate with them their various festivals under the guise that we call upon and worship same God. This is an erroneous belief.

To believe in the existence of Allah isn’t enough to take one out of disbelief to having faith in Allah. The idolators of Makkah believed in the existence of Allah. They believed He alone created the heavens and the earth; possesses the Mighty Throne, controls all affairs, sends rain from heaven and provides for them. They even believed that it’s only Allah who must be called upon at time of distress, unlike present day Christians who calls upon Christ both at ease and at time of distress. Despite this belief of the Quraysh, it neither made them believers nor saved them from Allah’s punishment. This Allah mentioned in many places in the Qur’an. He said in suratul Mu’minoon, 24: 84 -87

“Say: “Whose is the earth and whosoever is therein? If you know!”.
They will say: “It is Allah’s!” Say: “Will you not then remember?”
Say: “Who is (the) Lord of the seven heavens, and (the) Lord of the Great Throne?”
They will say: “Allah.” Say: “Will you not then fear Allah (believe in His Oneness, obey Him, believe in the Resurrection and Recompense for each and every good or bad deed).” 84-87

This point is also the message he passed through the poem he read ie believing in oneness of God in His essence.

He further buttressed his claim and said “you submitted to Allah and believe He is God”. Perhaps, he knew not that true submission is in tawheed – submitting to Him in His worship alone in the way He has commanded and without calling along Him anyone. The celestial church calls upon Angels for assistance beside Allah. They call upon holy Micheal, Holy Gabriel, etc. This is a major kufr!

To cap his error and affirm his stand that the Christians are upon the right path, he dropped the bomb and said *”in the might name of Jesus, you will be blessed”*! SubhanaLlah! This is the evil the scholars mentioned when they said it’s not appropriate to attend such gathering, rather it is haram as mentioned in the initial write up. I pray Allah does not hold him for such utterance – how many a time Allah punishes a slave because of a single statement which he might consider insignificant as authentically reported in many hadith!

 

A lot of people fall victim of this. How many a time Muslims in mixed gatherings comprising of both religions say “Amen” to similar statements while the Christians are praying! It is not proper for a Muslim, rather it is haram, to say “Amen” when other than Allah is being called – “Call not upon any one alongside Allah” – we call upon Allah alone!

Had Buhari gone to the place to explain in detail the elements of monotheism and called them to Islaam which we have been enjoined, no one would raise an eyebrow against his going. Rather, he would receive national accolade for such bravery and heroism. However, how apt is the Arabic poem: “faaqidu shayin laa yu’tee – one who lacks something can’t give it out”. That wasn’t his first blunder regarding tawheed anyway.

 

In short, the complete tawheed which brings sound belief and saves from the punishment of Allah is to belief in oneness of Allah in His essence, names, attributes and worship. He alone we must worship without associating partners with Him. This is the core of faith, submission and servitude without which there’s no salvation.

 

Lest I forget to mention is the repeated usage of “sheikh” by the writer in reference to Buhari. The word was unnecessarily used, carrying some degree of reverence. Nay! He’s not a sheikh neither is he close to one, unless it was a linguistic usage for an adult. Though that’s another issue entirely.

Back to the issue of entering a church for occasions of the Christians; for conference, ceremonies, lectures and the likes. Succinctly, the ruling regarding that is different from ruling regarding mere entering of the church or synagogue. There are conditions guiding the permissibility of that. It was asked on islamweb.net about entering of church for wedding. After stating the permissibility of entering the church, it says:
“If detestable acts and sins are present, then it is not allowed….”. It continues: “based on this, it is not permissible for you to enter the church because from what is known is that it is not free of sinful and detestable acts like tabarruj (waton display of ornaments), mixing of opposite sexes, musical instruments and songs, etc. The prohibition of entering is more pronounced if it involves recitation of things comprising of their disbelief (such as “in the mighty name of jesus, you’ll be blessed”), distortion and falsehood, because of the statement of Allah:

“And it has already been revealed to you in the Book (this Quran) that when you hear the Verses of Allah being denied and mocked at, then sit not with them, until they engage in a talk other than that; (but if you stayed with them) certainly in that case you would be like them. Surely, Allah will collect the hypocrites and disbelievers all together in Hell,” 4:140.” End of quote. (http://fatwa.islamweb.net/fatwa/index.php?page=showfatwa&Option=FatwaId&Id=112151)

Also, a similar question was put forward to sheikh al-Munaajid through is Web, Islamqa.com on going to church to deliver a lecture. He said:

“We put this question to Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen, may Allaah preserve him, who answered as follows:

This matter needs further examination, because the place is not appropriate, except in the unlikely event that it might be said that the Muslims are so powerful that they can proclaim their religion in the places of worship of the Christians. If this is the case, then it is good. But I am worried that it may be the opposite, i.e., that the Muslims are compelled to speak of their religion in the church. Hence I think that he should not do that, in order to avoid falling into this category (of being weak). And Allaah knows best.”. End of quote. (https://islamqa.info/en/11232).

In summary, tawheed – monotheism- is the pillar of our deen and must be protected jealously by whoever wishes to meet his Lord in safety. We must learn it, preach it and defend it even if we are threatened with incineration or death. I pray Allah forgive my excesses in this as well as the initial writer. May He count this solely for His sake and make us die upon tawheed. Wa salaLlahu ‘ala Muhammad wasallim.

Aboo ‘AbdirRahmaan Al-Luthee.

 

This article is the opinion of the writer and does not necessarily reflect knowislam.com.ng policy.

UK acid attack survivors demand government action

0

Thousands join calls demanding harsher punishment and tougher measures to buy corrosive substances amid rise in attacks.

Acid attack survivor Resham Khan pictured before and after being attacked in London [Resham Khan/change.org]

ACID ATTACKS IN THE UK

  • Rising attacks prompt calls for harsher punishment
  • Survivors say corrosive substances are too easy to buy
  • Hundreds of thousands sign petitions
  • London police report sharp rise in attacks

Survivors of acid attacks in the United Kingdom have raised a call for tougher laws against perpertrators and demanded stricter measures for the purchasing of corrosive substances after a spate of acid attacks in recent weeks.

Sulphuric acid in drain cleaners, bleaches and corrosive alkalis in battery fluid can be easily bought in shops across the UK at a low price.

Resham Khan, who was herself recently attacked in east London, launched a petition as she recovers from serious burns from her hospital bed.

Hundreds of thousands of Britons supported the campaigns on Friday, the same day two teenage boys earlier threw acid at five people in east London – leaving one victim with life-changing injuries.

“An attack like this could happen to anyone,” Khan’s online petition read. “It is about time that the law changes for the purchase of corrosive substances – right now you can buy it easily from any hardware store if you are 18 and over.

“Corrosive acids like sulphuric acid are very lethal and life damaging substances. You should only be allowed to purchase corrosive substances with a licence to buy. The person purchasing should go through checks so their details are held on a database or hold a licence.”

By early Saturday, almost 400,000 people had signed the 21-year-old’s bid.

As Khan celebrated her birthday on June 21 with her cousin Jameel Mukhtar, chief suspect John Tomlin threw a substance through their car window.

Tomlin, who is white, then fled the scene after attacking the pair, who are of South Asian descent, but eventually turned himself in. Police described the attack as a hate crime.

Mukhtar has said he believes they were targeted because of their Islamic faith.

“Although I will send this letter directly to numerous members of parliament and retailers of corrosive substances, I also extend this letter to the public,” said Khan.

“My plans are in pieces; my pain is unbearable, and I write this letter in hospital whilst I patiently wait for the return of my face … Why did this attack happen? What led to the event? But more importantly: Why is acid, or corrosive substances, so easy to obtain and be used as a weapon?”

Calls to restrict sales

Following Friday’s attack in east London, which saw the two teenage attackers spraying acid on victims from their mopeds, chief inspector Ben Clark from Hackney Borough, said: “Of late we have seen more attacks using corrosive substances in London.

“I would urge businesses and parents to challenge those who they think may be trying to obtain or carry these substances as this could help prevent serious offences and life changing injuries being caused.”

London’s Metropolitan police says the number of reported attacks in the capital rose from 261 in 2015 to 454 in 2016, a rise of 74 percent, according to British media.

In the first four months of 2017, there were more than 100 attacks, police said, London’s Metro newspaper said.

Katie Piper, another British survivor, also launched a campaign on Friday.

In 2008, when she was 24 years old, she was raped by her partner who later arranged for someone to throw sulphuric acid at her face.

That attack left Piper severely burned and blind in one eye.

In an open letter demanding government action, she wrote: “At present, it is all too easy for someone to buy a corrosive substance and throw it, sometimes from a distance, at another person. It is vital that we do everything we can to halt these types of attack.”

She also raised concerns regarding sentencing.

“The current legislation does not always recognise the severity of the offence and, therefore, the sentencing does not reflect the severity of the crime in some cases,” Piper said.

“Tougher sentencing would surely act as a deterrent to further attacks. The issue of penalties for carrying corrosive substances needs to be addressed and restrictions on the sale of corrosive substances need to be looked at seriously and methodically through a scientific and well-resourced approach that leads to swift action.”

Following Friday’s attack, Prime Minister Theresa May said the government was working with the police to see what more could be done to prevent attacks.

“It is already an offence to carry acid or a corrosive substance with intent to cause harm. And anyone using it can be prosecuted for pretty serious offences including ABH (Assault occasioning actual bodily harm) and GBH (Grievous bodily harm). We are working with the police to see what more we could do,” May told a Westminster briefing.

The rise in attacks has set off debate on social media. Here are some reactions:

My thoughts are with the victims of horrific acid attacks in North London. More must be done to tackle acid attacks, which have been rising.

80% of 400 annual acid attacks in UK are by white men.

Imagine if 80% were by brown immigrants? The country would be in chaos. https://twitter.com/bakerjjw/status/884731729596076032 

Just a reminder: John Tomlin, 24, is described as white, 6ft tall, of stocky build and with short fair hair: STILL NOT CAUGHT. pic.twitter.com/m3yJe1V7nT

London has on average 3 acid attacks a week. The approach needs to change. Tougher punishment and licensing needed!

we have one of the highest rates of acid attacks in the world – but the government is only just talking about doing something – why?

Acid attacks are also a form of terrorism, a person’s life virtually destroyed 

Absolutely horrified by news of a spate of acid attacks last night. A heinous crime. The perpetrators must feel the full force of the law.

How is acid violence in the UK different? Rather than targeting women, men are primarily the victims  

Source: Al Jazeera News

Misgoded reading : Islam (part 2 contd.)

0

Continued from here 

… that God was imperfect to begin with and required spiritual adjustment to a higher, faultless state.

 

Because Islam’s teachings have remained constant, there are no creedal inconsistencies. Is it true that early man lived by one creed and set of rules, the Jews by another, and the Christians a third?

That only Christians are saved by Jesus Christ’s atoning sacrifice? Islam answers No to both questions. Islam teaches that from the creation of man till the end of time, salvation has depended on acceptance of the same eternal creed, and adherence to the teachings of God’s prophets.

 

Along this line of thought, a person might question how different religions view the fate of Abraham, as well as that of other early prophets. Was Abraham subject to the laws of Judaism? Apparently not. If Judaism refers to the descendants of Judah, then Abraham, being the great­grandfather of Judah, was most certainly not a descendant
.
Genesis 11:31 defines Abraham as being from an area in Lower Mesopotamia called Ur of Chaldees, in what is now present­day Iraq.

 

Geographically speaking, and applying the terminology of today, Abraham was an Arab. Genesis 12:4­5 describes his move to Canaan (i.e., Palestine) at the age of seventy­five, and Genesis 17:8 confirms he was a stranger in that land.

 

Genesis 14:13 identifies the man as “Abraham the Hebrew”—

“Hebrew” meaning:

 

Any member of an ancient northern Semitic people that were the ancestors of the Jews. Historians use the term Hebrews to designate the descendants of the patriarchs of the Old Testament (i.e., Abraham, Isaac, and so on) from that period until their conquest of Canaan (Palestine) in the late 2nd millennium BC.

Thenceforth these people are referred to as Israelites until their return from the Babylonian Exile in the late 6th century BC, from which time on they became known as Jews.

 

Reading continues tomorrow, In shaa Allah. Subscribe to our free email alerts and newsletter or send your email address to [email protected].

 

Misgoded reading : Islam (part 2)

0

 

Check out previous reading… 

 

Nearly three hundred years ago, the following comment was offered by George Sale, one of the first to translate the Qur’an into English, a self­ professed antagonist of the man, Muhammad, and a hater of the Islamic religion:

 

“I shall not here enquire into the reasons why the law of Mohammed has met with so unexampled a reception in the world, (for they are greatly deceived who imagine it to have been propagated by the sword alone), or by what means it came to be embraced by nations which never felt the force of the Mohammedan arms, and even by those which stripped the Arabians of their conquests, and put an end to the sovereignty and very being of their Khalifs: yet it seems as if there was something more than what is vulgarly imagined, in a religion which has made so surprising a progress.”

 

It is just such sentiments that have prompted modern scholars to cast aside the popularized claims of coercion. For how can such a claim be made when Indonesia, the country with the largest Muslim population in the world, “never felt the force of the” Mohammedan arms,” having assimilated the Islamic religion from nothing more than the teachings and example of a few merchants from Yemen?

 

Such forces of Islamic progress are witnessed to this day. Islam has grown within the borders of countries and cultures that were not the conquered, but rather the conquerors of many of the Muslim lands.

 

In addition, Islam continues to grow and prosper within populations that stand in expressed contempt of the religion. No difficulty should be encountered, then, in accepting the following comment:

No other religion in history spread so rapidly as Islam.

 

By the time of Muhammad’s death (632 AD) Islam controlled a great part of Arabia. Soon it triumphed in Syria, Persia, Egypt, the lower borders of present Russia and across North Africa to the gates of Spain. In the next century, its progress was even more spectacular.

The West has widely believed that this surge of religion was made possible by the sword. But no modern scholar accepts that idea, and the Koran is explicit in support of freedom of conscience.

 

It is worth nothing that Islam does not differentiate between believers of different periods. The Islamic belief is that all messengers since Adam conveyed God’s revelation. The faithful submitted and followed, the unfaithful didn’t. Therefore, ever since Cain and Abel, mankind has been divided between the pious and impious, between good and evil.

 

Islam professes a consistency in creed from the time of Adam, and asserts that the tenets of faith declared at each and every stage in the chain of revelation were the same— without evolution or alteration. As the Creator has remained perfect and unchanged throughout time, so has His creed.

 

The Christian claim that God changed from the wrathful God of the Old Testament to the benevolent God of the New Testament is not honored by the Islamic religion, for it implies… Continue reading 

ISIL leader in Afghanistan 'killed in US raid'

0

Pentagon says Abu Sayed was killed earlier this week in a strike on his headquarters in Kunar province.

Two of Abu Sayed’s predecessors were also killed in strikes by the US military in Afghanistan. File photo [Reuters]

The head of ISIL in Afghanistan, Abu Sayed, was killed in an attack on his headquarters in Kunar province earlier this week, the Pentagon said on Friday.

Spokeswoman Dana White said in a statement on Friday that other members of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant were killed in the strike on Tuesday.

“US forces killed Abu Sayed, the emir of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria – Khorasan Province (ISIS-K) – in a strike on the group’s headquarters in Kunar Province, Afghanistan, July 11,” White said in the statement, referring to ISIL’s other acronym.

“The raid also killed other ISIS-K members and will significantly disrupt the terror group’s plans to expand its presence in Afghanistan.”

Sayed is the third Islamic State leader in Afghanistan to be killed since July 2016.

Sayed had led the group since late April after the previous leader, Abdul Hasib, had been killed by US forces. Hasib’s predecessor Hafiz Sayed Khan was also killed by US forces.

The US military had said Hasib’s death would “help reach our goal of destroying them in 2017.”

The compound used by Hasib in Nangarhar province was not far from the spot where on April 13, the US military dropped the largest non-nuclear bomb it has ever used in combat, hitting ISIL positions.

The deployment of the so-called Mother Of All Bombs (MOAB) killed at least 95 fighters, according to the Afghan defence ministry, but fighting in the area has continued.

ISIL established a presence in Afghanistan in 2015 and overran large parts of Nangarhar and Kunar provinces, near the Pakistan border.

However their part in the Afghan conflict had been largely overshadowed by the operations against the Taliban.

Source: News agencies

Supreme Court asked to overturn Muslim ban ruling

0

Federal judge in Hawaii expanded list of family relationships needed by people for US visas from six Muslim countries.

The ruling, if left in place, means refugees can continue to be resettled in the US, beyond a cap of 50,000 set by the executive order [AFP]
The ruling, if left in place, means refugees can continue to be resettled in the US, beyond a cap of 50,000 set by the executive order [AFP]

The US Justice Department has asked the Supreme Court to block a judge’s ruling that prevented President Donald Trump’s Muslim ban from being applied to grandparents of US citizens and refugees already being processed by resettlement agencies.

In a court filing on Friday, the administration asked the justices to overturn Thursday’s decision by a US district judge in Hawaii, which limited the scope of the administration’s temporary ban on refugees and travelers from six Muslim countries.

The latest round in the fight over Trump’s March 6 executive order, which he says is needed for national security reasons, came after the Supreme Court intervened last month to partially revive the two bans, which were blocked by lower courts.

The Supreme Court said then that the ban could take effect, but that people with a “bona fide relationship” to a US person or entity could not be barred.

The administration had narrowly interpreted that language, saying the ban would apply to grandparents and other family members, prompting the state of Hawaii to ask Hawaii-based US District Judge Derrick Watson to expand the definition of who could be admitted.

He ruled for the state late on Thursday.

“Common sense, for instance, dictates that close family members be defined to include grandparents,” US District Judge Derrick Watson said in his ruling.

“Indeed grandparents are the epitome of close family members.”

In the court filing, the Justice Department said Watson’s ruling on refugees would make the Supreme Court’s decision on that part of the executive order “effectively meaningless”.

The ruling, if left in place, means refugees can continue to be resettled in the United States, beyond a cap of 50,000 set by the executive order.

That limit was reached this week.

The Supreme Court’s decision last month revived parts of Trump’s March 6 executive order banning travelers from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for 90 days, as well as refugees for 120 days.

The Trump administration then decided that spouses, parents, children, fiances and siblings would be exempt from the ban, while grandparents and other family members travelling from those countries.

The Trump administration also said that all refugees without a close family tie would be blocked from the country for four months.

Source: News agencies

Juma'ah Canceled at Masjid Al-aqsa

0

Jumuʿah (Friday) prayers have been cancelled at al-Aqsa for the first time in 17 years after shootings

Three Palestinian men have been shot dead by Israeli Occupational Police Forces inside al-Aqsa Sanctuary. During the shooting exchange, two members of the occupational force were killed and another three injured. In a separate incident, another Palestinian was killed in Dheisheh Refugee Camp.

The three Palestinian men were residents of the Arab town of Umm al-Fahm inside 1948 borders and carriers of Israeli nationality.

The Inspector General of the occupational Police Force describes what transpired as an ‘unprecedented’ event. The three victims were Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed Jabareen, aged 29, Mohammed Hamed Abd Al-Latif Jabareen, 19, and Mohammed Ahmed Mafdal Jabareen according to the Shin Bet security service, none of whom have previous convictions.

The clashes erupted at around 7:15am local time at the vicinity of Baab Al-Asbat (Lions’ Gate), in the eastern part of the Old City leading to Al-Aqsa Masjid, when the three men allegedly fired at stationed occupational forces before entering Al-Aqsa for sanctuary where they were pursued.

The firefight continued and the three men fell at the vicinity of the Dome of the Rock Masjid . In the aftermath, occupational forces imposed a curfew around the Old City, cancelling
Jumu’ah prayers at Al-Aqsa Masjid and closing all of its gates, a measure last imposed in 1969, before evacuating all worshippers.

Analysts are expecting Israeli officials to exploit this event to support calls for further restrictions of one of Islam’s most important
Masājid . Member of Parliament, Moti Yogev, called for the compound to be “closed to Muslim [worshippers] for a long time.”

Other members of the Knesset have threatened that the “everything-is-mine policy” will cause them [Palestinians] to “pay the price” and they “will be left with nothing”, responding to a question about destroying a l-Aqsa Masjid.

Although legally acknowledged an Islamic Waqf or religious endowment belonging to Muslims across the world, and inseparable from Islam’s three
Masājid , custodians of other endowments across the world have been absent from taking action or voicing their condemnation of the occupation’s “Judaisation” and ethnic cleansing attempts at al-Aqsa.

The scene of today’s incident, ‘East Jerusalem’, is still internationally recognised as ‘Palestinian land’ whilst Israeli soldiers residing in East Jerusalem, imposing restrictions on Al-Aqsa Masjid, are recognised as an ‘Occupying Power’.

 

FAVORITES

en_USEnglish