Home Blog Page 7

How should Muslims react to insults on Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be upon him)? By Fuad-deen Olabisi Kekere-ekun

0

Islam is a very practical and pragmatic way of life which gives ample consideration to the nature of mankind and the different situations in which we find ourselves when legislating laws for people to live and abide by. This is because the Laws are of Divine origin from the One who created man and knows him better than man knows himself. He says in Suratul Mulk:
.
“Should He not know, – He who created? And He is The Subtle, The Aware.” (Mulk 67:14).
.
In Islam, we learnt that man has been honoured and raised in status by Allah, his Creator, over and above His other creations. We also learnt that not only has He honoured all the believers more than those who disbelieved in Him and His message sent down to mankind by declaring their lives, properties and honour to be sacred and inviolable, He also declared that the more their piety, the more honourable they will be in His sight and estimation.
.
The Prophets and Messengers of Allah, being the most pious set of humans automatically become the most honourable of the whole of mankind. It is forbidden in Islam to dishonour, insult or abuse a fellow muslim let alone a Prophet or Messenger of Allah. Rasulullah (s.a.w.) said in one narration,
.
“Abusing a Muslim is fusuq (transgression of limits set by Allah), and killing him is Kufr (Disbelief).”
.
Insulting a Prophet is even worse and more grievous in the Sight of Allah. It is a sacred religious duty of the Muslims to guard jealously the honour of the last Messenger of Allah, Sayyidina Muhammad (s.a.w.) because any insult to his personality indirectly casts doubts and aspersions on the message he delivered to mankind and aims at discrediting both the Messenger and his message.
.
I want us to carefully examine the responses of the Prophet (s.a.w.) and his companions to those who insulted the Prophet (s.a.w.) at different stages of his Divine mission. Allah says in Al-Maa’idah:
.
“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land : That is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the hereafter ; except for those who repent before they fall into your power : in that case, know that Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.” (Qur’an 5:33-34).
.
The above verses give the ruling concerning the one who insults the Prophet (s.a.w.) within the islamic state. One of the options mentioned is exile. This implies that if the offender commits the crime within the islamic state, since sending him away into exile is one of the options of punishment, the offender will automatically be free from further punishments if he escapes from the islamic territory into the land of the enemies of islam or the land of those who are under an agreement or pact with the Muslims. If the crime were committed outside the islamic state then the offender assumes the status of an exiled person and faces no punishment until he comes into the islamic state. Only then will the terms of the punishment take effect. In my opinion, this implies that the law cannot be implemented outside the islamic territory. Doing so will mean going against the laws of the land outside the islamic state. Just like we cannot amputate the hand of a thief outside the islamic state, we do not go after offenders who are not within the boundaries of the state or who have escaped into another state.
.
Perhaps the area of concern which I want us to examine more is the response of the muslims to this kind of crime when we are weak and oppressed in the land. Many verses of the Qur’an and ahadith of the Prophet (s.a.w.) enjoin us to be patient, tolerant and to persevere and endure the insults, annoyances, provocations, assaults and abuses that we may experience in the hands of the unbelievers when we are weak and oppressed in the land. A few examples readily comes to mind. When Abu Lahab insulted the Prophet (s.a.w.) in Makkah when the Muslims were still weak and oppressed in the land, he was left alone till Allah replied him in the Qur’an. He did not face any punishment. When the unbelievers of Makkah started making jest of the Prophet (s.a.w.) and calling him derogatory names like madman, poet, soothsayer, magician, etc he didn’t punish anyone since they were still weak and oppressed in the land, and had no military powers with which to execute the Shariah Laws then.
.
Today, we Muslims are weak and oppressed in the land even in the muslim lands where we are ruled by partial islamic laws or kufr laws in some cases, and some of our rulers are more loyal to the enemies of Islam than to Islam. Attempts made to insult our beloved Prophet (s.a.w.) are desperate efforts by the enemies of Islam to annoy and unsettle the muslims in order to divert their focus, attention and energies away from more serious plots that they are busy executing against the unsuspecting muslim ummah. What is enjoined on us in this situation is to remain patient.
.
During the early days of Islam in Makkah when the Muslims were weak and oppressed in the land, the Prophet (s.a.w.) was called by an insulting and derogatory name, “Muzammah”, and then they abused him with the name for instance, they said, “Muzammah is crazy and sick”. To this kind of statement of theirs, the Prophet (s.a.w.) would tell his companions to ignore them because they were abusing and insulting Muzammah, not him Muhammad since his name is not Muzammah. Just imagine the beautiful wisdom applied by the Prophet in such situations!.
.
Besides, if executing a law will bring or result in more evil than good, doing so may be waved to avoid the evil or to bring about some good like an opportunity of dawah through which some of the staunch enemies of Islam may embrace the faith. The Prophet (s.a.w.) forgave some of those who insulted him which led to their embracing Islam. This, in no way, portrays the Muslims as been weak. If such insults are passed on the Prophet deliberately by the agents of the enemy kufr state or the perpetrators enjoy the support and backing of the enemy kufr state when the Muslims have a state and army of their own, then it is enough reason for the Amir to declare Jihad against the enemy state.
.
But so long as we remain weak and oppressed in the land as we are now, we must remain patient till Allah gives us ascendancy in the land so as not to react in an irrationally suicidal manner. The man who lives in a glass house, they say, must not throw stones at people.

Wa Allahu a’lam.

Fuad-deen Olabisi Kekere-ekun

On Islam, Predeterminism and Incompatibilism By Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman

0

The theory of Predeterminism and Freewill have been subjects of discourse for ages and will continue to be. The religion of Islam quite presents a compatibilistic view that suggests the possibility of Predeterminism and Freewill co-existing at the same time. This can be seen from the Hadith:

“Narrated ‘Ali [radhi-yAllahu ‘anhu]: We were in the company of the Prophet (ﷺ) and he said,

“There is none among you but has his place written for him, either in Paradise or in the Hell-fire.” We said, “O Allah’s Messenger! Shall we depend (on this fact and give up work)?” He replied, “No! Carry on doing good deeds, for everybody will find easy (to do) such deeds as will lead him to his destined place.”

Then the Prophet (ﷺ) recited: “As for him who gives (in charity) and keeps his duty to Allah and fears Him, and believes in Al-Husna. We will make smooth for him the path of ease …” (V.92: 5-10) [Sahih Al-Bukhari, 6/4947 (O.P.472)]”

In contrast to incompatibilism that rejects the idea of the co-existence of Predeterminism and Freewill, the Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) in response to the Sahaba’s curiosity, presents a form of Predeterminism that encapsulates Causal and Nomological Determinism.

Predeterminism becomes logical, or at worst, paradoxical, but not illogical when we think about the fact everything we have ever invented came from our universe. It took us years to start writing, discover oil, go into space, invent cars and phones, yet, the resources for our PAST, PRESENT, and FUTURE inventions have been deposited in our universe thousands of years ago.

Everything that led to our enlightenment and civilization predated us. What was/is/ needed was/is that NECESSITY to explore our universe. Our own planet itself, EARTH, has in abundance, enough resources to sustain us.

Who knows our future past, present, and future problems and deposited these resources? If we call the universe, “Mother”, is the universe itself conscious?

These resources used to invent solution to human problems, are they random or whoever deposited them saw through our future ahead of us and knew what they can be used for, leaving us with the intellect to explore as necessity demands?

Charlie Chaplin said, “the good Earth is rich and can provide for everyone”. How true! However, not only is the Earth rich enough to sustain us, it’s mouth is wide enough to swallow our bodies.

Allah says, “Al-‘Alaq 96:3

ٱقْرَأْ وَرَبُّكَ ٱلْأَكْرَمُ

Recite, and your Lord is the most Generous

Al-‘Alaq 96:4

ٱلَّذِى عَلَّمَ بِٱلْقَلَمِ

Who taught by the pen

Al-‘Alaq 96:5

عَلَّمَ ٱلْإِنسَٰنَ مَا لَمْ يَعْلَمْ

English – Sahih International

Taught man that which he KNEW NOT.

How much do we know compared to what we are set to know and those things we may never know not of?

Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman

NASFAT bans cross-over programmes across all branches

0

Nasrul-lahi-li Fathi Society of Nigeria popularly known as NASFAT has banned all programmes marking the end of the year 2022 or the beginning of the year 2023 across all its branches. KnowIslam gathered the information from NASFAT’s press release. They wrote:

Date: December 27th, 2022

From: The Mission Board Secretariat

To: All NAṢFAT Missioners worldwide

Dear Imams,

As-Salām ‘Alaykum Waraḥmatullāhi Wabarakātuh

Prohibition of December 31st/January 1st Tahajjud/All Cross-Over Activities at NAṢFAT Locations Worldwide

This is to inform all NAṢFAT Missioners that programmes marking the end of the year 2022 or the beginning of the year 2023 are banned in all branches and groups of NAṢFAT.

Missioners who violate this order, by holding December 31st/January Tahajjud 1st or any Cross-over programme in their branches or groups will be subjected to stringent punitive measures.

In the meantime, Missioners are urged to educate their members that holding special prayers or Tahajjud to mark the end or beginning of the year has no place in our religion.

True Muslims do not need to wait for the year to end or start before asking Allah for His mercy, protection and blessings. True Muslims are in touch with Allah at all times.

We are a Muslim Society. Therefore, we must at all times keep strictly to our Islamic identity. Any attempt to compromise our Islamic identity or portray us as a society imitating non-Muslims, by any member of the Mission Board will be met with serious consequences.

We will be in touch with our informants across branches and groups to obtain information on possible breaches of this order.

Thank you.

Abdul-Ganiyy Raji
National Da’wah Officer/Mission Board Secretary

On The Religiosity or Secularism Of Christmas And New Year Festivals – Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman

0

“Fireworks…hats…gifts…Santa…Church…Greek…Rome…Jesus…Janus…music…lights…”

The celebration of Christmas and the New Year Festival of the Gregorian Calendar is arguably one of the most debated topics in history. Now universal, religious people, intellectuals, and historians have and continue to debate the permissibility, rationality, and historical accuracy of these festivals.

While Christmas still largely remains a religious festival, it started to become more secular and not exclusively religious since the 20th century especially when Father Christmas or Santa Claus was included in the celebration. When England stopped keeping the Feast Day of Saint Nicholas (Santa Claus), it moved the celebration from December 6 to 25 to coincide with Christmas Day. Given several other contemporary reformations, Religious Liberals, Secularists, and irreligious individuals celebrate these festivals as mere secular holidays.

While many Christian denominations celebrate it as a religious festival to mark the birth of Jesus, known to them as the “Son of God”, others have disagreed, refusing to mark Christmas celebrations believing the date to be incorrect. They also opine that it has pagan roots, thus, being secular regardless, it goes against their conscience to partake in whatever has elements of paganism in it. The same goes for celebrating the New Year of the Gregorian Calendar.

There are also, amongst Muslims, disagreements as to whether these festivals should be celebrated or not. These disagreements go as far as sending out wishes or congratulatory messages on these festivals. The Liberals join actively in the celebration, while some who are not necessarily Liberals, Sheikh Qardawiyy for example, passively join in these celebrations like sending and receiving gifts, sending wishes, etc. On the other hand, conservative groups, the Salafis as an example, are opposed to these celebrations citing the Qur’an verse that says “My religion to me and yours to you (Qur’an 109:6)”.

The Jehovah’s Witnesses, Seventh Day Adventists, Deeper Life, and Mountain of Fire Ministries are Christian denominations that do not celebrate either Christmas or New Year or both. Pastor W.F Kumuyi of the Deeper Life Church said,  “We don’t celebrate Christmas nor sing Christmas carol; because Christmas is of idolatrous background”. Also, Pastor Pastor D.K. Olukoya of the Mountain of Fire and Miracles Ministries, ”We don’t celebrate Christmas because the root is demonic”. One important question to ask is, “Do the Pagan roots or inaccuracies of these now almost Secular festivals really matter in the 21st Century?”.

It is common practice to call Christmas a Yuletide Season, so, from whence comes Yuletide? Historically, Yule is an ancient festival observed by the Germanic people. The festival is connected to the Norse god, Odin. Yule would go on to undergo Christian reformulation. In fact, the Yule logYule goatYule boarYule singing, and some other Christmas customs and traditions have connections to ancient pagan Yule customs.

The gospel of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John did not record the birth date of Jesus.  While Origen and Arnobius faulted the pagans for celebrating birthdays, early Christian writers like Iranaeus and Tertullian did not mention Christmas bringing us to the conclusion that it was not celebrated during their time. Christmas was first celebrated in Rome on December 25, AD 336. So, the historical accuracy of Christmas continues to be questioned.

The most widely used Gregorian Calender has its months and weeks named after Roman gods, goddesses, leaders, and elements. The month of January was named after Janus, a two-headed god who is considered the god of beginnings, gates, transitions, time, duality, doorways, passages, and ending. Thus, celebrating the first of January was an ancient Roman practice dedicated to Janus.

This article does not seek to make a comprehensive analysis of these celebrations but to give an idea of their roots and how they have changed especially in contemporary times. The question being asked is,

  • Have they become less or not pagan even if it has become seemingly secularized?
  • Should the correctness of a tradition be based on wide acceptance?

Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman

 

 

A Discourse on the logical and illogical incomprehensible nature of God By Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman

0

In the religion of Islam, when we say what we do not have answers to everything divine, we do not mean to say these things are illogical.

If we say we do not have answers to who created God, it does not make the idea of God or an originator illogical. In fact, the premise of a Creator is based on logic – for this to be, that must have.

If we say that by our inherent intelligence, we may not be able to fully grasp the idea of humans given Freewill and will account for their actions even though all had been predetermined, it may sound paradoxical but not in itself illogical. In the context of Predeterminism, we have witnessed occurrences whether it be good or bad that we cannot explain, some say it is fate, others say it is mother nature. In the context of accounting for Freewill, not only have we humans developed and analyzed consequentlist ideas, human governments limit human freedom with liberty and could punish them for certain acts even though they are free-willed by inherence.

In another vein, we have seen in other belief systems where the incomprehensibility of God is premised on illogicality.

They say God is three in one, yet, he is one. It is said by them that the Father is God, the son is God and the holy spirit is God, yet the father is not the son, the son is not the holy spirit and the holy spirit is not the father, albeit, these three are one. This is said to be incomprehensible as God’s way isn’t same as man’s.

It is also said by that that man sinned against God, this God came to earth to die did the sins man committed against him out of his loving nature. This God in John 3:16 sent his only begotten son who is himself God who came down in human flesh, cried to God who is himself but not himself in Mark 15:34. This same God rose to himself but not himself to sit at the right hand side of himself but not himself.

These sayings are preposterous, and preposterousness by default is incomprehensible. Thus, these ideas of God’s incomprehensibility as expressed in these belief systems are illogical and do not necessarily reflect God’s nature.

That we cannot fully comprehend God’s nature is not an invite to portray God as a two-sided triangle or a round square.

In the Qur’an, Allah tells us of his nature and asks,

“Do you not reason?

This call to reason explains why Islam encapsulates intellectualism, logic and enlightenment.

Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman

Lagos versus Iran: The Hijab and selective activism by Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman

0

The Lagos State Government had directed all schools in the state to allow the wearing of Hijab for female students willing to. The directive came about six months after the Supreme Court affirmed that banning the Hijab was an act of discrimination against Muslim students. In October 2014, Justice Modupe Onyeabor, in her judgment, ruled that banning the wearing of hijab on school uniforms within and outside the school premises was not discriminatory.

Whether a woman should wear the hijab, where and where the Hijab should be allowed, and if Muslim women wear the Hijab out of compulsion has been a subject of discourse in different parts of the world. Oftentimes, this is discussed within the context of freedom, rights, and diversity. The actions of many Western Media and some government policies question what constitutes rights, when and where do they apply, or whether they are selective.

The death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini re-ignited anti-Hijab protests in Iran. This series of protests have been supported by Western Media in Iran and other places where a relatively few, when compared to the majority, demand that not using the Hijab should be decriminalized. They support these protests citing the need to protect human rights and freedom. However, while some women are protesting against the wearing of Hijab in Iran, most Muslim women in France are protesting against the ban on Hijab. What a twist!

Since 2010, France has banned the use of Niqab in public spaces. Violators risk a fine of €150. While the Hijab is not banned in public spaces, it is prohibited in government buildings, including schools and universities. John Lichfield explained that President Jacques Chirac’s decision to ban all religious signs from state schools was targeted at girls wearing Muslim headscarves. The French government backs up its decision with its laws on laws on laïcité (secularism).

Muslims continue to campaign for the rights of Women to use the Hijab in the West but the media downplay these campaigns, giving protests again the Hijab the most attention. If it is the right of a few Iranians not to want to wear the Hijab, why then is it not the right of a Muslim woman in the west to want to use the Hijab. These double standards also explain why it took the Lagos State Government about six months to implement a court ruling that approves the use of Hijab in schools. If the reverse was the case, the order would be executed with immediate effect.

It is a thing of surprise that Muslims have to go to court to demand that their children are allowed to use the Hijab in schools in the South-Western Part of Nigeria where the people have been exposed to Islam about 400 years before the coming of the missionaries. Not just that, many of these states have been governed by Muslims. This exposes us to the reality of Muslims in the South-Eastern part of Nigeria where Islam is being treated as something foreign. Lagos has approved the use of Hijab, the campaign must be taken to the South-East as well.

Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman

 

 

Truth For The Truth Seekers Continued

0

Contradictions in the Bible

NEW TESTAMENT 

The rich cannot enter heaven; the kingdom of God is for the poor – Luke 6:20, Matt 19:24, James 5:1

God rewards by bestowing wealth and disciples can be rich – Job 42:10, Matt 27:57

Satan entered Judas at the last supper – John 13:27 Satan entered Judas before the last supper – Luke 22:1-3

Food offered to idols should be avoided – Acts 15:29

It is of no importance if food offered to idols is eaten – 1 Cor 8:1,4,7,8

It was those who accused Jesus and were responsible for his death who buried him – Acts 13:27-29

It was Joseph of Arimathea, a disciple, who buried Jesus – Matt 27:59-60

Christ is the only master – Matt 23:10

Employers are masters – Eph 6:5,9

There were six generations inclusive between Joram and Jotham – 1 Chron 3:11-12

There were three generations inclusive between Joram and Jotham – Matt 1:8-9

Jesus’ home was at Capernaum – Mark 1:9,24, 2:1 Jesus’ home was in Judea – John 4:43-45

  1. In John, Jesus leaves Jerusalem in Judea and goes to Galilee because “a prophet has no honour in his own country” – therefore Judea must have been his home country – contradicting Mark.

Believers will be deceived into leaving the faith – 1 Tim 4:1, Heb 6:4-6, Gal 3:1, Rev 2:5

God will protect believers from being led astray – Psa 31:23, 37:28,32,33, John 10:27-29

Jesus never changes – Heb 13:8

Jesus does change – he dwelt with the Father (John 17:5), was born an infant with human weaknesses (Luke 2:7,52),

became separated from God (Matt 27:46), then died (Matt 27:50), was then in Hades (Acts 2:31), was then raised from the dead in a glorified body (1 Cor 15:45) and ascended into heaven where he mediates (1 John 2:1, 1 Tim 2:5)

Moses was inarticulate – Ex 4:10

Moses was articulate – Acts 7:22

Only God is to be called ‘father’ – Matt 23:9

Various people can be called ‘father’ – 1 Cor 10:1, Eph 6:1-4, 1 John 2:13-14, Matt 15:4

Jesus prayed to God to be saved from death, and he was heard – Heb 5:7

Jesus prayed to God to be saved from death and was not heard (ie. he was executed the next day) – Luke 22:41,42,44,47,54, 23:33

Buy Truth For The Truth Seekers on Amazon

Read Previous

KnowIslam donates food to deaf widow

0

About to months ago, an interaction with a relatively menial worker opened another page that exposes the reality of some needy Muslims who, out of poverty, lose their deen in pursuit of survival.  The said menial worker was a woman who said she would be going to a church to get the food promised to them. Sadly, despite dancing and singing to the point of tiredness, no food was given.

Following the publication of the story, an individual required that we get her the foodstuff with some cash. Consequent to this noble act, the KnowIslam Project set up a committee and included monthly food donations to vulnerable Muslims.

Last month, through Al-awn, the KnowIslam Project donated foodstuff to a deaf widow who is about 60 years old in Ede, Osun State. We pray that Allah rewards all donors.

The KnowIslam Fund group supports KnowIslam Da’wah and Philanthropic activities. To be a part, kindly reach us on Whatsapp:

Abdul-Azeez Johnson: +234 817 939 8383

Hafsah: +234 902 180 0574

Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman for the KnowIslam Project

NIQĀB: FOR THE CREATOR OR HIS CREATURE? By Sanni Kay Yusuf

Some of our women take off the niqāb when they get divorced by their husbands or become widowed by destiny. This act, unfortunately, makes one wonder for whom their faces were veiled ab initio – Allāh (their Creator) or their husbands (His Creatures)?

Record has shown that wearing niqāb by women who do as aforementioned is either by force (from their husbands) or peer influence or pressure (from friends, neighbours, relations etc), not by conviction – that the face is actually worth the veil.

I know a woman who accepted to wear the niqāb after being pressured and even fought by her husband, and at a point – when the husband, according to her, was no more financially responsible – she unrepentantly took it off, not minding the corresponding spiritual implications or what brethren in the community would say. All efforts to get her back to the initial standard proved abortive.

Some of our women use the niqāb because their friends or most women in the community they live in use it, not that they are convinced of its religious value. And at the slightest trial from Allāh, or change of environment to a place where fellow niqābīs are hardly seen or nowhere found, they get demoralized and shaytān takes charge of their heads with the thought of removing it.

That niqābīs act ultra vires to the sacred garment they adorn is incontrovertible. Our eyes, irritably, can see it; and our emotions, distatefully too, can feel it. It is so because some do not even know what niqāb is, let alone fathom why they use it.

What then do we expect of a lady on whose nikāh day the garment was forcefully placed on her head and tears of regret consequently streamed down her cheeks? What will such an innocent ignoramus not do under the niqāb? So, hearing that a niqābī was found adulterous to the extent of doing twosome with her husband or somebody else’s husband, for instance, might though be saddening but shouldn’t in any way be shocking. That a niqābī was found dancing publicly and disgustingly to a musical song is, no doubt, a reflection of the above factor.

The use of niqāb is the peak of dressing for the Muslim woman, and the reward for doing so is apparently unquantifiable, especially at this time when the users are seen as strangers, extremists, fanatics, fundamentalists etc. by ignorant ones, among whom are Muslims. Niqāb was the dressing of the best of women – wives of the holy prophet – who, undoubtedly, are worth being mirrored for a good life. But women should not be forced to wear it, so as to curtail, or perhaps contain, the sinful act of removing it. They should rather, in my opinion, be encouraged, and platforms (giving internal lectures, attending gatherings where souls are worn for Allāh etc) be set to learn about it.

Truth be told, wearing a jilbāb isn’t easy, let alone covering the face. That’s why those who do it are considered the best in terms of dressing. Cues may be taken from the use of facemasks. Despite taking them off at will, unlike niqāb that is meant to be permanently worn, we never found it easy when coronavirus broke out. I, personally, can confirm that wearing a niqāb is only easy for the extra-ordinarily pious women. This is why I personally think women should not be forced but tutored and encouraged. May Allāh bless and accordingly reward all niqābīs and grant them Jannah for their rare obedience and submissiveness.

Dear woman,

If you are, however, forced by your husband, know that you are only being triggered to do one of the things that would make you have entry into Jannah. Do not see it as force. Consider it as encouragement. Admonish your heart to accept Allāh’s command.

Imam Sanni Kay Yusuf

Truth For The Truth Seekers Continued

0

MORE CONTRADICTIONS FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT

Jesse had eight sons. 1 Sam.16:10, 11; 1 Sam.17:12. Jesse had seven sons. 1 Chr.2:13-15.

Saul knew David before the encounter with Goliath. 1 Sam.16:19.

Saul did not know David until after the encounter with Goliath. 1 Sam.17:55-58.

Michal was childless. 2 Sam.6:23.

Michal had five sons. 2 Sam.21:8.

David sinned in taking the census. 2 Sam.24:10,25. David’s only sin, ever, was another matter. 1 Ki.15:5.  David paid 50 pieces of silver for the property. 2 Sam.24:24. David paid 600 pieces of gold for the property. 1 Chr.21:25.  His name was Solomon. 2 Sam.12:24; 1 Chr.22:9. His name was Jedidiah. 2 Sam.12:25.

Solomon had 40,000 stalls of horses. 1 Ki.4:26. Solomon had 4,000 stalls of horses. 2 Chr.9:25.  Solomon had 3300 supervisors. 1 Ki.5:16.

Solomon had 3600 supervisors. 2 Chr.2:2.

Solomon’s “molten sea” held 2000 “baths”. 1 Ki.7:26. Solomon’s “molten sea” held 3000 “baths”. 2 Chr.4:5.  Solomon had thousands of horses. 1 Ki.4:26.

A King must not multiply horses to himself. Deut.17:15,16.  Solomon had hundreds of wives. 1 Ki.11:1-3.

A King must not multiply wives to himself. Deut.17:17.

There was no greater king before or after Hezekiah. 2 Ki.18:1, 5.

There was no greater king before or after Josiah. 2 Ki.23:24, 25.

Ahaziah was twenty-two years old when he began to reign. 2 Ki.8:26.

Ahaziah succeeded his father, who was thirty-two years old when he became king and who ruled for eight years. 2 Chr.21;20.

He was forty-two years old when he began to reign. 2 Chr.22:2. (Note that some versions have caught the error and corrected it.)

God prohibits the making of idols. Ex.20:4; Deut.5:8, 9. God commands idols to be made. Ex.25:18; Num.21:8, 9.

Children are to suffer for their parent’s sins. Ex.20:5; Ex.34:7; Num.14:18; Deut.5:9; Is.14:21.

Children are not to suffer for their parent’s sins. Deut.24:16; Ezek.18:19,20.

God prohibits the killing of the innocent. Ex.23:7.

God approves the killing of the innocent. Num.31:17; Josh.6:21; Josh.7:24-26; Josh.8:22-25; Josh.10:20, 40; Josh.11:15; 1 Sam.15:3.

God inflicts sickness. Num.11:33; 2 Chr.21:14, 15. Satan inflicts sickness. Job 2:7.

Death to a false prophet. Deut.18:20.

Death also to a real prophet deceived by “God”. Ezek.14:9.  God remembers sin even when it has been forgiven. Ex.34:7.

God does not remember sin after it has been forgiven. Jer.31:34.

God promised the land to the people. Ex.12:25. God broke his promise. Num.14:30, 31.

Sisera was sleeping when Jael killed him. Jud.4:21.

Sisera was standing and apparently, allowed Jael to kill him. Jud.5:25-27.

Joshua captured Debir. Josh.10:38,39.

Othniel captured Debir. Jud.1:11-13.

God sows discord. Gen.11:7-9.

God hates those who cause discord. Prov.6:16-19.

The census count was: Israel 800,000 and Judah 500,000. 2 Sam.24:9.

The census count was: Israel 1,100,000 and Judah 470,000. 1 Chr.21:5.

The two pillars were 18 cubits high. 1 Ki.7:15. The two pillars were 35 cubits high. 2 Chr.3:15.  420 talents of gold were brought back from Ophir. 1 Ki.9:28.

450 talents of gold were brought back from Ophir. 2 Chr.8:18.

Asa removed the high places. 2 Chr.14:2, 3.

Asa did not remove the high places. 1 Ki.15:14.

Baasha died in the 26th year of King Asa’s reign. 1 Ki.16:6- 8.

Baasha built a city in the 36th year of King Asa’s reign. 2 Chr.16:1.

Jehoshaphat did not remove the high places. 1 Ki.22:42, 43. Jehoshaphat did remove the high places. 2 Chr.17:5, 6.  Jehu’s massacre was acceptable to God. 2 Ki.10:30. Jehu’s massacre was not acceptable to God. Hos.1:4.

Jehu shot Ahaziah near Ibleam. Ahaziah then fled to Meggido and died there. 2 Ki.9:27.

Ahaziah was found hiding in Samaria, brought to Jehu, and was then put to death. 2 Chr.22:9.

Ahaz was not conquered. 2 Ki.165.

Ahaz was conquered. 2 Chr.28:5.

Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he began to reign. 2 Ki.24:8.

Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he began to reign. 2 Chr.36:9. (Some versions have corrected this)

Jehoiachin reigned 3 months. 2 Ki.24:8.

Jehoiachin reigned 3 months and 10 days. 2 Chr.36:9.  Jehoiachin was succeeded by his uncle. 2 Ki.24:17. Jehoiachin was succeeded by his brother. 2 Chr.36:10.  The father of Zerubbabel was Pedaiah. 1 Chr.3:19. The father of Zerubbabel was Shealtiel. Ezr.3:2.  God is near to all who call on him. Ps.145:18.

God is far away and cannot be found in times of need. Ps.10:1.

God sometimes forsakes his children. Ps.22:1, 2. God is always a present help. Ps.46:1.

The righteous shall rejoice when he sees vengeance. Ps.58:10, 11.

Do not rejoice when your enemy falls or stumbles. Prov.24:17.

God stands to judge. Is.3:13.

God sits to judge. Joel 3:12.

Zedekiah watched his sons be put to death, then he had his eyes put out, and was left to die in prison. Jer.52:10, 11.

God promised Zedekiah a peaceful death. Jer.34:4, 5.

Omri reigned 12 years beginning in the 31st year of Asa’s reign. 1 Ki.16:23.

Omri died and his son began his reign in the 38th year of

Asa’s reign, making Omri’s reign only 7-years. 1 Ki.16:28, 29.

Buy Truth For The Truth Seekers on Amazon

Read Previous

 

FAVORITES

en_USEnglish