Home Blog Page 154

Selective Grieving! – #IstandwithShariifahYunus

0

 

3 days ago, Muslims were killed in a mosque attack in Mubi, Nigeria. Today, it happened in Arish (North Sinai), Egypt. We have seen a few headlines, but where is the mass coverage?

Why isn’t “terror” on screens? Is it because “we” are not the victims? Why do we selectively grieve? – Dr. Craig Considine

Even though we Muslims do not support the actions of ISIS, Boko Haram etc, we are made to apologize for their actions. What evidence do we need again to prove that the media is totally anti-islam?

Stories of crimes against Muslims are being downplayed. Is it surprising that people have to stand with Paris, London when there is a ‘terrorist’ attack but no one seem to care about Syria when what happened in Paris happens everyday in Syria?

The media is silent over Hate Crimes against Muslims. One Kemi Ilori yanked off the Hijab of a Muslimah (Shariifah Yunus). What is the media saying about it? Nothing. Who is talking about it? Who is writing against the hate crime? Read about the hate crime here :

#IstandwithShariifahYunus

http://aledeh.com/removed-niqob-istandwithsharifahyunus/

This Kemi Ilori denied immediately! Who cannot play the game of denial? Someone who denied but on her Facebook timeline is a post that calls for learning Swahili as an African instead of Arabic Language.

We are calling on Muslims to day away with the pictures of the Kemi Ilori we know. The face of the culprit is not hidden but we should not post the picture on Social media since she denies. Let us keep writing on this till the end. If she keeps denying, we also cannot say which Kemi Ilori we are writing against.

The case is in court and we need the support of all Muslims (especially those in various media houses) to stand with Shariifah Yunus. By the grace of Allah, Kemi Ilori will regret except she confesses and ask for forgiveness from Sister Shariifah Yunus and all Muslims.

We are not raising tension but doing what is right. It is not the Niqob they hate but Islam hence this is about everyone one of us.

A Kemi Ilori out there wants to hate you for having beards, wants to oppress your daughter for having the Hijab on, your son for holding a copy of the Qur’an. One way or the other, one Kemi Ilori is out there and we are all victims.

 

Are non-Muslims against this action? Can you be be peaceful enough to join the #IstandwithSheriffahYunus campaign?

Even if she escapes in this world, Allah says;

Surah Al-Burooj, Verse 10:
إِنَّ الَّذِينَ فَتَنُوا الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَالْمُؤْمِنَاتِ ثُمَّ لَمْ يَتُوبُوا فَلَهُمْ عَذَابُ جَهَنَّمَ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابُ الْحَرِيقِ

Those who persecute (or draw into temptation) the Believers, men and women, and do not turn in repentance, will have the Penalty of Hell: They will have the Penalty of the Burning Fire.

 

Please, repost and share. Freedom for one is freedom for all!!!

Bashir Lucas Samson Lukman (CEO,  knowislam.com.ng)

LIBERALITY

0

LIBERALITY?

One phenomenon that has and still keeps straying a lot of Muslims today is to lay claim to the self-glorified phrase: ‘liberal Muslim’. This is not only alien to Islam; it is an effrontery against the supremacy of the Owner of the religion, Allah. One is either an obedient or a disobedient Muslim. Liberality or liberalism is a reflection of the latter.

الاسلام هو الاستسلام لله..
Islam is the total, absolute and complete submission and adherence to the will of Allah, as enshrined in the Qur’an and the Sunnah, and as practised by the pious predecessors. So if Islam were about full submission, how then could its adherents lay claim to liberality – halfway submission?

Liberality is the act of doing something, or carrying out an obligation as one so wishes, irrespective of modalities or templates. Liberality is about selective adherence to orders or instructions – doing some, leaving some undone. One may decide to be liberal on personal endeavours, not as regards religion.

With the above description, it shows that whoever claims to be liberal is, undoubtedly, a disobedient Muslim. And if such a carefree servant isn’t so careful, he may fall into disbelief. That is more dangerous!

Carry out Islamic obligations to the peak of your ability. Pray to Allah to make others easy for you. When you hear anything quoted from the Qur’an or the Sunnah, whether you can do it or not, accept it as a divine message.

By
Sanni Kay. Yusuf

WASWAS (SATANIC WHISPERS) ABOUT THE EVIL EYE.

0

WASWAS (SATANIC WHISPERS) ABOUT THE EVIL EYE.

 

Q. If a person admires something and mentions Allah, can he harm it by the evil eye? 
If someone is uncertain about that and this is causing a lot of problems in his social life, and he is afraid to look at things and people, knowing that he does not envy people (hasad) for the things that they have, and he does not want to harm anyone, by Allah, and he reads Quran and remembers Allah all the time

Praise be to Allah

It should be noted that Islam does not bring any hardship. Rather, one of the most important aims of sharee’ah (Islamic law) is to relieve people of hardship. 

Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):  

{Allah does not intend to make difficulty for you} (5:6) 

It is not permissible for a Muslim to listen to the shaytan and let him fill his life with doubts, waswas and paranoia, for if he does that he will lose out in this world and will not gain anything in the Hereafter. Such whispers are merely tricks of the accursed shaytan who wants to cause grief for those who believe. And Allah is the best of protectors and the most merciful of those who show mercy. 

What you must do is put a stop to all these whispers, and not pay any attention to bad thoughts. It is sufficient for you to say the dhikr (words of remembrance) that is prescribed in sharee’ah when you see something good, and Allah will protect it against the evil eye and destructive envy. Remembrance of Allah (dhikr) and the evil eye or envy cannot coexist. 

It was narrated from Abu Umamah ibn Sahl ibn Haneef that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “Why don’t you invoke blessings, for the evil eye is real.” 

Narrated by Malik in al-Muwatta; classed as saheeh (authentic) by al-Albani in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah. 

Al-Zarqani said in Sharh al-Muwatta (4/320): i.e., why don’t you say, Barak Allahu feek (May Allaah bless you), and that would cancel out what is feared of the evil eye and take away its effects. End quote. 

It was narrated from ‘Abd-Allah ibn ‘Amir ibn Rabee’ah from his father (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “If one of you sees in himself or his brother something that he likes, let him pray for blessings, for the evil eye is real.” 

Narrated by al-Hakim in al-Mustadrak. He said: This is a hadeeth whose isnad (chain of narrators) is saheeh, although they (al-Bukhari and Muslim) did not narrate it with any mention of invoking blessing. And al-Dhahabi agreed with him. It was classed as saheeh by al-Albani in Saheeh al-Jami’. 

It says in al-Mawsoo’ah al-Fiqhiyyah (13/31). 

This indicates that the evil eye cannot cause any harm if the one who may harm with the evil eye invokes blessings. What is prescribed for everyone who admires something is to invoke blessings, for if he prays for blessings, the harm must inevitably be diverted. Invoking blessings means to say: Tabarak Allah ahsan al-khaliqeen, Allahummah barik fihi (Blessed be Allah the best of creators, O Allah bless it). 

Al-Nawawi said: It is mustahabb (desirable) for the one who may harm with the evil eye to pray for blessing for the one who may be harmed and say Allahumma barik wa la tadurrahu (O Allah, bless and do not harm him) and Ma sha Allah la quwwata illa Billah (As Allah wills, there is no power except with Allah). End quote. 

Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said in Fath al-Bari (10/205): 

The one who admires something should hasten to pray that the thing he admires be blessed, and that will be a ruqyah (permissible incantation) on his part. End quote. 

In Fatawa al-Lajnah al-Daimah (1/547) it says: 

The remedy for the one who may cause harm with the evil eye when he sees something he admires is to remember Allah and invoke blessing. End quote. 

Al-Shaykh al-Fawzan said in al-Muntaqa (1/question no. 87): 

If the one who may cause harm with the evil eye fears that he may harm the thing he is looking at, then he should say: Allahumma barik ‘alayhi (O Allaah, bless it). Similarly it is mustahabb for him to say: Ma sha Allah la quwwata illa Billah (As Allah wills, there is no power except with Allah), because it was narrated from Hisham ibn ‘Urwah from his father that when he saw a thing that he liked or he entered one of his gardens, he would say: Ma sha Allah la quwwata illa Billah (As Allah wills, there is no power except with Allah). 

If the one who may cause harm with the evil eye always says this dhikr, then he will ward off its harm, in sha Allah. 

It says in Fatawa al-Shaykh ‘Abd al-Kareem al-Khudayr (5): 

The Muslim should not let doubts, illusions, suspicion and excessive fear of the evil eye overwhelm him so much that he becomes afflicted with psychological illness and the like. He should think positively of Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, and understand that whatever befalls him only happens by the will of Allah, may He be blessed and exalted. So let him turn to Allah, because He alone is able to ward off harm and relieve distress. End quote. 

If you see something that you like, then pray to Allah for blessing, and do not pay attention to anything else. Allah will protect it because of your du’a (supplication), and will ward off all harm from it. Do not let yourself keep on fearing it, for Allah does not want that for His slaves. Also keep striving to make yourself see the will of Allah in all things, for He has great wisdom in what He gives and withholds, lowers and raises, and there is none to put back His Judgement, and none can change His Words.  

Always remember – O slave of Allah – that this world and everything in it is too insignificant for people to envy one another about and transgress against one another for its sake, as al-Mutanabbi said: 

What hearts desire is too insignificant for people to transgress against one another or destroy one another in pursuit of. 

And Allah knows best.

MENOPAUSE: TURMOIL OR TRANSITION

0

MENOPAUSE: TURMOIL OR TRANSITION

menopause is a landmaark that indicates the end of a woman’s fertility period. it is more of a period than a point. it doesnt happen all of a sudden, but over a period of time. the woman ovary contains a finite number of eggs which are released once in a month and also contain the hormones (oestrogen and progesteron) which helps to control menstruation and ovulation. Menopause happens when the ovaries stop releasing eggs everymonth, and menstruation ceases.

It pesents with varieties of signs and symptoms which are unique to individuals. the signs and symptoms on a gneral note may include, but not limited to; anxiety, dry skin, irritability, moodiness, reduced sex drive, vagina drynes, dryness or loss of scalp hair, early wakening or absolute insomnia ( lack of sleep), fatigue, night sweats and osteoporosis (loss of bone density), hot flashes, or sweating and absence of menstruation.

The physical emotional and psychological manifestations of menopause all together can be challenging and affect som women’s daily activities. Although there is a strong correlation between social influences and menopause transition.

The islamic definition of menopause is very similar to that of medical. Islam recognises hat once a full yar or twelve consecutive months marked by the absence of menstruation have passed, a woman is said to haave attained menopause. The age agreed upon by all jurispudence is age 60 (counting by lunar years). any blood seen after this age is not classified as hayd (menstruation), eventhough it might bear signs of menstrual blood.

In islam, menopause is a landark signaling the end of a womans fertility period and eligibility for marriage. therefore, as it is obligatory for a woman who has attained menarchy to cast an outer garment over her adornments, there is no sin for a woman who has attained menopause to remove her’s (outer garment). so long shes not causing fitnah with this permissibility as evident in the verse of the Quran stated below.

‘Such elderly women as are past the prospect of marriage, there is no blame on them if they lay aside their (outer) garments, provided they make no wanton display of their beauty; but it is best for them to be modest; and Allah is One Who sees and knows all things.’ Qur’an, Surah An-Nur 24:60

In conclusion, menopause is a transitory period between a period of fertility and that of infertility. understanding of the consequencs of this transitory period is very neccessary for all women, most especially those who are near the menopausal age. Importantly seeking medical advices when the signs nd symptoms become overwhelming. Although very few women do not experience sympotms severe enough to tamper with their daily activities and usual functionalities, it can be very severe and highly demanding for others.

May Allah aza wa jal perfect all that concerns us, and give us the optimal health possible, and also grant us the ability to be able to use the health bestowed on us solely for His worship. Aamin.

By Aaminah Qasim

Bangladesh Agrees Deal With Myanmar To Return Thousands Of Rohingyans

40

According to the BBC, Bangladeshi authorities have signed a dral with the government of Myanmar to return hundreds of thousands if Rohingya Muslims.

This news will serve as a breather to Bangladesh who have taken in and provided a camp and stead for almost 1 million Rohingyans who fled Myanmar after what the United Nations called an “ethnic cleansing.”

 

So many Rohingyans had fled the country after being pummelled, maligned and decimated by a largely non-Muslim government.

The details of the deal are yet to be made available as it is a developing story and will be updated as soon as more information is gotten.


A Rohingya child sits amid piles of donated clothes at a refugee camp in southern Bangladesh.
Tommy Trenchard/Caritas

 

Recall that the Myanmar President, Suu Kyi had lost a prize she won from her alma mater, Oxford University for her involvements in the ethnic cleansing of thousands of Rohingyan Muslims, a situation  tagged as one of the worst in the history of mankind.

 

Credit : Aledeh.com

Who removed the Niqob? #IstandwithShariifahYunus

0

 

The hatred shown towards the Muslims especially the feminine gender is becoming so alarming and grossly unbearable. The incidence at Adeyemi Bero auditorium on 20th of November where one Kemi Ilori opened the veil of one of our sisters; an exhibitor in the event she (Kemi Ilori) managed, is one big enough to get out of hand if we weren’t peace loving people.

( Read about the abuse here https://knowislam.com.ng/istandwithshariifahyunus/)

We are peaceful people and we call for peace but that wouldn’t deter us from speaking out and tell the world about our rights as Muslims or tell a wrong when we notice one.

A declaration was made 10th of December,  1948 on Human right and that was called Universal Declaration of Human Right ( UDHR). Has this declaration and several others been nullified? Even though this declaration is faulty because total nudism is inclusive. So in a world where so many women are proud of roaming the world naked when they should rather feel and be ashamed of the weight of the ignominy descending on them, we have women who are humiliated for their own choice to be chaste.

I usually wonder if many still retain their humanness because one of the characteristics that differentiate animals from man is the fact that animals go naked and man is given the reasoning that tells him to cover nakedness when in public. For men, it is not as grievous to expose their nudity as for women, yet men have been fair in this. How can someone who is not properly dressed be the one challenging the well well dressed?! Kemi should understand there is no crime in not being a Muslim (at least in this world) but there is every crime to condemn a decently dressed muslim woman. Every non muslim should understand that a muslim lady is free to dress whichever way she prefers, just like she also is free to. May be this people are not aware, the dressing of a muslim lady is the commandment by her Lord in the Qur’an An Nur 24:31, so if she feels to dress this way it should be nobody’s headache. She should be free to partake in any function be it business, learning and social functions without any hindrance even in this dress. What Kemi exhibited was totally unbecoming and was an impropriety displayed by someone who was supposed to be mature, this is a battle not for our dear sister but for the generality of Muslims. We therefore ask Kemi to give her unreserved apology and make it public. Many apologised on her behalf at the venue instantly but showing no remourse for her impropriety signified she felt she knows people who are in power and wouldn’t say sorry for anything… The powerful is Allaah alone and every other being is powerless. He can decide to dethrone whoever He wills and crown whoever He wills.

 

Many non-Muslims accuse Islam of things they are guilty of. They think that Muslim women are forced to wear the Hijab but they FORCE them to remove it. They think Muslim women are oppressed but they are the oppressors who cannot tolerate others. They assault those they think are in bondage.

It is ridiculously ridiculous to shout “Freedom! Freedom” yet not being a true advocate of Freedom. Is it not preposterous to believe that homosexuality is freedom but wearing a veil is Oppression? If someone is free to walk around naked, why is there no freedom to be covered? Isfreedom for one not freedom for all?

Game of Denial!!!

At Knowislam.com.ng, we state authoritatively that the name of this woman that opened the veil of Sister Shariifah Yunus is Kemi Ilori! The name was not to be publicized earlier because there was no video evidence that she did it.

People were present when it happened and they are witnesses. Should it be surprising that the one who could disrespect other people’s freedom, infringe their rights, would lie to cover up her action? No!

Kemi Ilori immediately denied removing the veil immediately. SubhanAllah!!! This is a call to Kemi Ilori that removed the veil of Sister Shariifah Yunus to tender an apology to Sister Shariifah. We cannot tolerate what should not be tolerated. Those who cannot tolerate others deserves no tolerance.

Apologizing is the best option for Kemi Ilori not unnecessary ego. Kemi Ilori’s name was not revealed earlier because she could just deny and that would amount to false accusation. She can go ahead to deny, can we not also deny the Kemi Ilori in question?

If we decide not to deal with issues like these because the culprit would deny, then we have opened the door to gross oppression. Many would remove the veil of Muslim women and deny immediately. Should Muslim women now be at alert to record insults?

We Muslims are peaceful and we will welcome an apology from Kemi Ilori or fight it to the end. She can deny not removing the veil and we can also deny the Kemi Ilori in question when the time comes.

This is the time we Muslims need to show our strength as an ‘Ummah. It is not just about Shariifah Yunus but our wives, sisters, mothers and aunties! If a Muslim strips someone naked because she is having a mini-skirt on, can we sleep???

The Christian community should also declare that they are against this action with the hashtag “IstandwithShariifahYunus”, the same way we are made to apologize for the acts of ignorant Muslims or those who lay claim to Islam falsely.

Wearing the veil does not make you repugnant nor retarded!

#IstandwithSheriffahYunus

Share!!!

 

Knowislam.com.ng Team

… Telling the Muslim story

#IstandwithShariifahYunus

0

#Istandwithshariifah

My name is Shariifah Yunus,I was assaulted,violated and my faith as a muslim woman made into a mockery,because I choose to be decent and covered!

November 20th 2017 I went to Alausa secretariat at Adeyemi Bero Hall for an exhibition.

I wanted to talk to a lady concerning a proposed exhibition some women entrepreneurs are organising. She is said to be the one who was given the contract to partition the exhibition center at the event.
As i called her and she turned towards me,without provocation and excuse of any sort, she yanked, pulled and lifted my niqob(face cover) in public ,exposing me and saying in derision , “who are you”?

I was shocked , extremely embarrassed, upset and felt violated!
I asked, “why would you do that” ? She replied,” I don’t have time for this,I am here to work,if you have anything to say to me go and say it to my boys”!
I went after her and told her she could apologise and she shouted ,”sorry,is that what you want to hear”,she hissed and walked away!

Imagine someone lifting up your skirts while pulling down your pants in public? That feeling of being victimized and oppressed was how I felt, her non remorseful actions and speech made it abhorrent !

People came out to comfort me as i was weeping,I was so upset and kept wondering why would someone have so much hatred…
I knew she was highly connected as she talked with the arrogance of someone who is. My sisters went to her and she kept shouting at them she has no time,besides she isn’t a Muslim so how would she know if it was wrong!

I am posting this for several reasons. In the last few weeks i have been assaulted more than thrice while someone threatened to beat me up,my crime has always been, having the guts to dress as a muslim woman in Lagos/Nigeria!
I have been called a terrorist,insulted and abused. All these by mainly non-muslims. I am shocked at how Nigerians have become so filled with hatred and intolerance. People will assault/insult us and say ,”e de ni elesin ni yin”! People will tell us leave them, yet they cant take it. In fact when i went to report her,someone actually gave her the excuse that she did what she did cos she was scared of me,while another person said Nigeria is dangerous now so she did that for protection!

Some elders apologised on her behalf,but lo and behold i saw her again and she denied what she did and then threatened me arrogantly with “her siblings being on the bench”!

As people irrespective of your religion,being human means you should protect others,not abuse nor assault them. When people are mean and abuse other’s fundamental human right,get up,stand up and protect the abused! Here in Nigeria,people misbehave because they know that the law cant touch them as they have “connections”. We can however change the narrative. When people do things wrongly,call then out and make them recant and apologise. Its abuse of rights to beg the offended and let the abuser go scot free. I am a muslim woman,this country belongs to my daughters and yours!

My submission,
*My Lord is not on a bench, but on His throne! If I lied against YOU, then may His wrath be upon me. If YOU lied that YOU didn’t open my face veil, then may His wrath,anger and punishment be upon YOU till YOU publicly repent and apologize as YOU violated me in public!*

#myfacemybusiness
#Myhijabmychoice
#Notobullies
#Notooppression
#Toloratehijab
#protectthemuslima
#standupforthemuslima
#myniqobmychoice
#notoridicule
#Myreligionnotagainstconstitution
#myveilmychoice
#hijabISmymodesty
#Istandwithislam #zerotolerancetohijabbullies
#November20
#knowislam.com.ng
#enarrate
#enradio
#thenewnarrative
#en
@enarrateradio
NB: Hopefully, we can discuss this on enRADIO soon. We need to protect our Muslimah.

*SHARE AS FAR AS YOU CAN PLEASE*

LETTER OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD TO HERACLIUS, THE SOVEREIGN OF BYZANTINE

0

LETTER OF PROPHET MOHAMMAD TO HERACLIUS, THE SOVEREIGN OF BYZANTINE.

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas [radhi-yAllahu ‘anhu]: Abu Sufyan narrated to me personally, saying, “I set out during the truce that had been concluded between me and Allah’s Messenger . While I was in Sham, a letter sent by the Prophet (ﷺ) was brought to Heraclius. Dihya Al-Kalbi had brought and given it to the governor of Busra, and the latter forwarded it to Heraclius. Heraclius said, ‘Is there anyone from the people of this man who claims to be a Prophet?’ The people replied, ‘Yes,’ so, along with some other Quraishi men, I was called and we entered upon Heraclius, and we were seated in front of him. Then he said, ‘Who amongst you is the nearest relative to the man who claims to be a Prophet?’ I (Abu Sufyan) replied: ‘I am the nearest relative to him from amongst the group.’ So they made me sit in front of him and made my companions sit behind me. Then he called upon his translator and said (to him). ‘Tell them (i.e. Abu Sufyan’s companions) that I am going to ask him (i.e. Abu Sufyan garding that man who claims to be a Prophet. So, if he tells me a lie, they should contradict him (instantly).’ By Allah, had I not been afraid that my companions would consider me a liar, I would have told lies. Heraclius then said to his translator, ‘Ask him: What is his (i.e. the Prophet’s) family status amongst you?’ I said, ‘He belongs to a noble family amongst us.’ Heraclius said, ‘Was any of his ancestors a king?’ I said, ‘No’. He said, ‘Did you ever accuse him of telling lies before his saying what he has said?’ I said, ‘No’. He said, ‘Do the nobles follow him or the poor people?’ I said, ‘It is the poor who follow him.’ He said, ‘Is the number of his followers increasing or decreasing?’ I said, ‘They are increasing.’ He said, ‘Does anyone renounce his religion (i.e. Islam) after embracing it, being displeased with it?’ I said, ‘No.’ He said, ‘Did you fight with him?’ I replied, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘How was your fighting with him?’ I said, ‘The fighting between us was undecided and victory was shared by him and us in turns. He inflicts casualties upon us and we inflict casualties upon him.’ He said, ‘Did he ever betray?’ I said, ‘No, but now we are away from him in this truce and we do not know what he will do in it.’ ” Abu Sufyan added, “By Allah, I was not able to insert in my speech a word (against him) except that. Heraclius said, ‘Did anybody else (amongst you) ever claim the same (i.e. to be Allah’s Prophet) before him?’ I said, ‘No’. Then Heraclius told his translator to tell me (i.e. Abu Sufyan), ‘I asked you about his family status amongst you, and you told me that he comes from a noble family amongst you. Verily, all Messengers come from the noblest family among their people. Then I asked you whether any of his ancestors was a king, and you denied that. Thereupon I thought that had one of his forefathers been a king, I would have said that he (i.e. Muhammad) (ﷺ) was seeking to rule the kingdom of his forefathers. Then I asked you regarding his followers, whether they were the noble or the poor among the people, and you said that they were only poor (who follow him). In fact, such are the followers of the Messengers. Then I asked you whether you have ever accused him of telling lies before he said what he said, and your reply was in the negative. Therefore, I took for granted that a man who did not tell a lie about others, could never tell a lie about Allah. Then I asked you whether anyone of his followers had renounced his religion (i.e. Islam) after embracing it, being displeased with it, and you denied that. And such is Faith when its delight enters the heart and mixes with it completely. Then I asked you whether his followers were increasing or decreasing. You claimed that they were increasing, that is the way of true Faith till it is complete. Then I asked you whether you had ever fought with him, and you claimed that you had fought with him and the battle between you and him was undecided and the victory was shared by you and him in turns; he inflicted casualties upon you and you inflicted casualties upon them. Such is the case with the Messengers, they are put to trials and the final victory is for them. Then I asked you whether he has ever betrayed anyone; you claimed that he had never betrayed. Indeed, Messengers never betray. Then I asked you whether anyone had said this statement before him; and you denied that. Thereupon I thought if somebody had said that statement before him, then I would have said that he was but a man copying some sayings said before him.’ ” Abu Sufyan said, “Heraclius then asked me, ‘What does he order you to do?’ I said, ‘He orders us (to offer) prayers and (to pay) Zakat (obligatory charity), and to keep good relationship with the kith and kin, and to be chaste.’ Then Heraclius said, ‘If whatever you have said is true, then he is really a Prophet. I knew that he (i.e. the Prophet ) was going to appear, but I never thought that he would be from amongst you. If I were certain that I can reach him, I would like to meet him and if I were with him, I would wash his feet; and his kingdom will expand (surely) to what is under my feet.’ Then Heraclius asked for the letter of Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) and read it, wherein was written:

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

(This letter is) from Muhammad, Messenger of Allah, to Heraclius, the sovereign of Byzantine … Peace be upon him who follows the Right Path. Now then, I call you to embrace Islam. Embrace Islam and you will be saved (from Allah’s punishment); embrace Islam, and Allah will give you a double reward, but if you reject this, you will be responsible for the sins of all the people of your kingdom: (Allah’s Statement:)

“O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Come to a word that is just between us and you, that we worship none but Allah (Alone) … bear witness that we are Muslims.” (3:64).

“When he finished reading the letter, voices grew louder near him and there was a great hue and cry, and we were ordered to go out.” Abu Sufyan added, “While coming out, I said to my companions, ‘The matter of Ibn Abu Kabshah* (i.e. Muhammad (ﷺ) ) has become so prominent that even the king of Banu Al-Asfar (i.e. the Romans) is afraid of him.’ So I continued to believe that Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) would be victorious, till Allah made me embrace Islam.” Az-Zuhri said, “Heraclius then invited all the chiefs of the Byzantine and had them assembled in his house and said, ‘O group of Byzantine! Do you wish to have a permanent success and guidance and that your kingdom should remain with you?’ (Immediately after hearing that), they rushed towards the gate like onagers, but they found them closed. Heraclius then said, ‘Bring them back to me.’ So he called them and said, ‘I just wanted to test the strength of your adherence to your religion. Now I have observed of you that which I like.’ Then the people fell in prostration before him and became pleased with him.”

[Sahih Al-Bukhari, 6/4553 (O.P.75)]

* Abu Kabshah was not the father of the Prophet (ﷺ) but it was a mockery done by Abu Sufyan out of hostility against the Prophet .

Misgoded reading continued

0

Click here for previous session

 

 

When all else fails, John 10:30 relates Jesus as having said, “I and the Father are
one.” Short, succinct, to the point, and terribly flawed. In this verse, the manuscript Greek
for the English “one” is heis. 139 This word also occurs in John 17:11 and 17:21­23. John
17:11 reads, “Holy Father, keep through Your name those whom You have given me,
that they may be one as we are” (italics mine). Literal or metaphorical? John 17:21
reinforces the metaphor with the words, “That they [i.e., all believers] all may be one, as
You, Father, are in me, and I in You, that they [i.e., all believers] also may be one in us,
that the world may believe that You sent me” (italics mine). If a person is faithful to the
equation, the sum total adds up to a whole lot more than three­in­one; a person either has
to think bigger and more blasphemous, or rewrite the rules of mathematics, if the Trinity
is to be preserved.

John 10:30, being a widely misapplied verse, nonetheless deserves a closer
examination. Trinitarian Christianity argues that Jesus declared, “I and the Father are
one,” whereupon the Jews prepared to stone him for blasphemy according to their
accusation that, “You, being a Man, make yourself God” (John 10:33). The argument is
that the Jews recognized Jesus’ claim to being God, so all should understand John 10:30
similarly. This might seem a reasonable argument at first glance, but only if the passage
is taken out of context.
To analyze the passage appropriately, we might begin with the preceding verse,
John 10:29, which emphasizes the separate and distinct natures of God and Jesus—One
the giver, the other the receiver. Many who subsequently read John 10:30 come away
with the understanding that this verse relates Jesus and God to be in agreement, one in
understanding, or one in purpose. And let us note Jesus’ response to the Jews’ accusation
of claiming divinity. Did he stand up with divine confidence and insist, “You heard me
right, I said it once, and I’ll say it again!”? Just the opposite; he said that they had
misunderstood, and quoted Psalm 82:6 to remind the Jews that the phrases “son of God”
and “you are gods” are metaphors. In the words of the Bible,
Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your law, ‘I (God) said,
“You are gods”?
*
If He called them gods, to whom the word of God came
(and the Scripture cannot be broken), do you say of him whom the Father
sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said,
‘I am the son of God’?” (John 10:34­36).

Jesus included himself with those “to whom the word of God [i.e., revelation] came,” who were identified in the referenced Psalm 82:6 as “gods” with a small G or
“children of God.” Psalm 82:1 makes a bold metaphor by identifying judges as “gods”—
not as righteous men, not as prophets, not as sons of god, but as gods. Furthermore,
Psalm 82:6­7 leaves no doubt that “sons of god” refers to mortal human beings: “I [God] said, ‘You are gods, and all of you are children of the Most High. But you shall die like
men, and fall like one of the princes.’” And lastly, let us not forget that the Greek huios,
translated as “son” in the above quote, was “used very widely of immediate, remote or
figurative kinship.”
140
So in reading John 10:30 in context, we find that Jesus identified himself with
other righteous mortals, emphasized the figurative meaning of “son of God,” denied
divinity, and behaved as would be expected of a flesh­and­blood prophet. After all, if
Jesus were a partner in Godhead, wouldn’t he have defended his rank with the confidence
of divine omnipotence?

 

…..continue reading…..

At-Tauhid reading continued

0

Click here for previous session

 

 

What is said about the One who is not satisfied with an Oath taken by Allah’s Name

Ibn Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) narrated that Allah’s Messenger (May the peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) said: “Do not swear by your forefathers. Whoever swears by Allah, let him speak the truth. And the one for whom the oath is taken in the Name of Allah, should be satisfied with it, and whoever is not satisfied, is not from the slaves of Allah.”
[This Hadith was reported by Ibn Majah with good Isnad)]

Important issues of the Chapter

1) To make an oath by forefathers is not allowed.

2) The person for whom an oath by Allah’s Name is made, must be acceptant of it.

3) The punishment for the person who is not satisfied by an oath made by Allah’s Name.

 

 

……continue reading…..

FAVORITES

en_USEnglish